Acer KA270H vs HP Z23i

(6)
(4)
Acer KA270H
HP Z23i

Top Prices

No prices found
eBay
In stock, only 3 left!
Antonline
Delivery unknown
In stock (1758 available)
Amazon US
Out of stock

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The Acer KA270H is a 27"" PC monitor. That's 4" bigger than the HP Z23i (23""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Brighter display brightness Edit
The Acer KA270H is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the HP Z23i (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
4ms faster response time Edit
The Acer KA270H has a response time of 4msms, whereas the HP Z23i is an 8msms response time PC monitor (4ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Better user reviews
The average user review score of the Acer KA270H is 92%, but the average rating of the HP Z23i is 85% (based on 4 reviews).
3 Reasons For
52mm shorter Edit
The HP Z23i is a 329mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 52mm shorter than the Acer KA270H (329mmmm).
22% shallower Edit
The HP Z23i has a depth of 51mmmm, however the Acer KA270H is a 62mmmm deep PC monitor (11mm deeper).
96mm narrower Edit
The HP Z23i is a 544mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 96mm narrower than the Acer KA270H (544mmmm).

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
14% taller Edit
The Acer KA270H has a height of 381mmmm. That's 52mm taller than the HP Z23i (329mmmm).
Deeper Edit
Acer KA270H is 62mmmm deep, but the HP Z23i is a 51mmmm deep PC monitor (11mm shallower).
15% wider Edit
The Acer KA270H has a width of 640mmmm. That's 96mm wider than the HP Z23i (544mmmm).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by two months
The Acer KA270H is two months older than the HP Z23i.
4 Reasons Against
18% smaller screen size Edit
The HP Z23i is a 23"" PC monitor. That's 4" smaller than the Acer KA270H (23""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP Z23i is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Acer KA270H (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
4ms slower response time Edit
The HP Z23i has a response time of 8msms, but the Acer KA270H is a 4msms response time PC monitor (4ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

User review Rating is Worse
The HP Z23i's average user score is 85%, however the Acer KA270H's is 92% (based on 5 reviews).

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

20 months Ago 18 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data

Display

Screen Size
27"
BEST
23"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 286.4mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 509.1mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 76
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 24 - 94
Pixel Pitch
0.31 x 0.31 Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 58.4cm
Display Technology
 VA
 VA
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
Response Time
4ms
BEST
8ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 3
HDMI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 3
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 150mm
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 360

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 C
BEST
 C
Power Consumption When Off
0.35W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
28.5W
BEST
28W
Standby Power Consumption
0.45W
BEST
0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
59kWh Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 36W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Weight & Dimensions

Height With Stand
478.9mm 469.9mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
200mm
BEST
242.9mm
Width With Stand
640mm 544mm
BEST
Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 6.4kg
Height
381mm 329mm
BEST
Depth
62mm 51mm
BEST
Width
640mm 544mm
BEST
Feedback