Acer KA270H vs Acer S241HL

(6)
(24)
Acer KA270H
Acer S241HL

Top Prices

No prices found
Newegg UK
eBay
Standard delivery: $14.91
In stock, only 3 left!
BuyVPC
Delivery unknown
In stock (12 available)

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
3" bigger screen size Edit
The Acer KA270H is a 27"" PC monitor. That's 3" bigger than the Acer S241HL (24""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

18° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Acer KA270H has a vertical viewing angle of 178°°, whereas the Acer S241HL is only a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
Wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Acer KA270H is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° wider than the Acer S241HL (170°°).
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The Acer KA270H is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Acer S241HL (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
Lower power consumption when off Edit
The Acer KA270H is a 0.35WW power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.1W lower than the Acer S241HL (0.45WW).
Much better user reviews
Based on 5 user reviews, the average review score of the Acer KA270H is 92%, whereas the average rating of the Acer S241HL is 79% (based on 23 reviews).
2 Reasons For
Vastly faster response time Edit
The Acer S241HL has a response time of 2msms, however the Acer KA270H is a 4msms response time PC monitor (2ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

74% lower annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer S241HL is a 34kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 25kWh lower than the Acer KA270H (34kWhkWh).

Reasons Against

3 Reasons Against
2ms slower response time Edit
The Acer KA270H has a response time of 4msms, however the Acer S241HL is a 2msms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

43% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer KA270H is a 59kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 25kWh higher than the Acer S241HL (34kWhkWh).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
7 Reasons Against
3" smaller screen size Edit
The Acer S241HL is a 24"" PC monitor. That's 3" smaller than the Acer KA270H (24""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

18° narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Acer S241HL has a vertical viewing angle of 160°°, whereas the Acer KA270H is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider).
Narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Acer S241HL is a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° narrower than the Acer KA270H (170°°).
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The Acer S241HL is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Acer KA270H (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
23% higher power consumption when off Edit
The Acer S241HL is a 0.45WW power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.1W higher than the Acer KA270H (0.45WW).
Older by over two years
The Acer S241HL is two years older than the Acer KA270H.
User review Rating is much Worse
The average user rating of the Acer S241HL is only 79%, whereas the average user rating of the Acer KA270H is 92% (based on 5 reviews).

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

20 months Ago 46 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 24.27
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.14
Total running cost $ 26.41
Purchase price $ 119.99
Total cost of ownership $ 146.40
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.17T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.17 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
4
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27"
BEST
24"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.31 x 0.31 Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
160°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
170°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 61cm
Display Technology
 VA
 VA
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
Response Time
4ms 2ms
BEST
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

HDMI Port
1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 1

Multimedia

Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 -5 - 15

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 C
BEST
 C
Power Consumption When Off
0.35W
BEST
0.45W
Typical Power Consumption
28.5W 19.8W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.45W
BEST
0.46W
Annual Energy Consumption
59kWh 34kWh
BEST
Input Voltage
 110 - 220
 110 - 220
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 110
 220
 110-220
 110
 220
 110-220

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 MPR II
 MPR II
BEST

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 3.8kg
Height With Stand
478.9mm 401mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
200mm 166mm
BEST
Width With Stand
640mm 565mm
BEST
Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 3.5kg
Height
381mm 401.3mm
Depth
62mm 165.1mm
Width
640mm 563.9mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
BEST

Other Features

Product Included
Unknown - Click to provide data 1pc(s)
Feedback