LG 32LS33 vs Samsung S24A850DW

(12)
LG 32LS33
Samsung S24A850DW

Top Prices

No prices found No prices found

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The LG 32LS33 has a screen size of 31.55"", but the Samsung S24A850DW is only a 24"" PC monitor (7.55" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Bigger display diagonal Edit
The LG 32LS33 has a display diagonal of 81.3cmcm, but the Samsung S24A850DW is only a 61cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (20.3cm smaller).
Lighter Edit
The LG 32LS33 is a 5.6kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.2g lighter than the Samsung S24A850DW (5.8kgg).
5 Reasons For
Faster response time Edit
The Samsung S24A850DW is a 5msms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms faster than the LG 32LS33 (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Four USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The Samsung S24A850DW has four USB Type-A downstream ports, however the LG 32LS33 only has one USB Type-A downstream port.
15% shorter Edit
The Samsung S24A850DW has a height of 374.5mmmm, however the LG 32LS33 is a 430.1mmmm tall PC monitor (55.6mm taller).
Shallower Edit
Samsung S24A850DW is 41.5mmmm deep. That's 14mm shallower than the LG 32LS33 (41.5mmmm).
172.4mm narrower Edit
The Samsung S24A850DW has a width of 558.5mmmm, however the LG 32LS33 is a 730.9mmmm wide PC monitor (172.4mm wider).

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The LG 32LS33 is a 9msms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms slower than the Samsung S24A850DW (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only DVI ports Edit
The LG 32LS33 is a DVI port PC monitor, whereas the Samsung S24A850DW only has one DVI port.
Only one USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The LG 32LS33 has one USB Type-A downstream port, however the Samsung S24A850DW only has four USB Type-A downstream ports.
13% taller Edit
The LG 32LS33 has a height of 430.1mmmm, however the Samsung S24A850DW is a 374.5mmmm tall PC monitor (55.6mm shorter).
Deeper Edit
LG 32LS33 is 55.5mmmm deep. That's 14mm deeper than the Samsung S24A850DW (41.5mmmm).
24% wider Edit
The LG 32LS33 has a width of 730.9mmmm, however the Samsung S24A850DW is a 558.5mmmm wide PC monitor (172.4mm narrower).
4 Reasons Against
A lot smaller screen size Edit
The Samsung S24A850DW has a screen size of 24"", but the LG 32LS33 is a 31.55"" PC monitor (7.55" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

20.3cm smaller display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S24A850DW has a display diagonal of 61cmcm, but the LG 32LS33 is an 81.3cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (20.3cm bigger).
Heavier Edit
The Samsung S24A850DW is a 5.8kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.2g heavier than the LG 32LS33 (5.8kgg).
Over one year older
The Samsung S24A850DW is older than the LG 32LS33 by 23 months.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

31 months Ago 54 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 77.77
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.85
Total running cost $ 79.62

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.52T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.52 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
13
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
31.55"
BEST
24"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
BEST
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 500000:1
BEST
 500000:1
Display Type
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
BEST
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
BEST
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 61
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 75
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.270 x 0.270
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1200:1
BEST
 1200:1
Display Diagonal
81.3cm
BEST
61cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
9ms 5ms
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:10
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
RS-232 Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 2.0 Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 4
HDMI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
1
BEST
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 5
USB Type-A Downstream Port
1 4
BEST
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)

Multimedia

Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64

Networking

Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 150mm
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -2 - 25

Power

Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
30W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
45W
BEST
64W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.4W
BEST
Maximum Power Consumption
45W Unknown - Click to provide data
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO 5.0
 TCO
 TCO 5.0
BEST
Electromagnetic Compatibility
 CE
 FCC
 ACE
 KCC
 CCC
 CE
 FCC
 ACE
 KCC
 CCC

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
7.1kg
BEST
7.8kg
Packaging Height
505mm 443mm
BEST
Packaging Depth
139mm
BEST
179mm
Packaging Width
812mm 630mm
BEST
Bezel Width At Bottom
14mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Bezel Width At Top
10.5mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Bezel Width On Side
10mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
5.8kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height With Stand
480.2mm 447mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
207mm
BEST
224.5mm
Width With Stand
730.9mm 558.5mm
BEST
Weight
5.6kg
BEST
5.8kg
Height
430.1mm 374.5mm
BEST
Depth
55.5mm 41.5mm
BEST
Width
730.9mm 558.5mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 USB
 AC
 VGA
 USB
 AC

Other Features

Power Consumption in Economy Mode
30W Unknown - Click to provide data
Product Included
Unknown - Click to provide data 1pc(s)
Placement
 Horizontal
 Horizontal
Feedback