LG 32LS33 vs Philips 298P4

(46)
LG 32LS33
Philips 298P4

Top Prices

No prices found No prices found

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
2.55" bigger screen size Edit
The LG 32LS33 has a screen size of 31.55"", whereas the Philips 298P4 is only a 29"" PC monitor (2.55" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

8.3cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The LG 32LS33 has a display diagonal of 81.3cmcm, whereas the Philips 298P4 is only a 73cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (8.3cm smaller).
2% lighter Edit
The LG 32LS33 is a 5.6kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.1g lighter than the Philips 298P4 (5.7kgg).
7% shallower Edit
The LG 32LS33 is a 55.5mmmm deep PC monitor. That's 3.5mm shallower than the Philips 298P4 (59mmmm).
6 Reasons For
One more HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the Philips 298P4 is two, but the LG 32LS33 only has one HDMI port.
Three more USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The Philips 298P4 has four USB Type-A downstream ports, however the LG 32LS33 only has one USB Type-A downstream port.
20% lower power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Philips 298P4 has a power consumption when in PowerSave mode of 25.1WW, however the LG 32LS33 is a 30WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (4.9W higher).
31% shorter Edit
The Philips 298P4 has a height of 330mmmm. That's 100.1mm shorter than the LG 32LS33 (330mmmm).
Narrower Edit
The Philips 298P4 has a width of 700mmmm. That's 30.9mm narrower than the LG 32LS33 (700mmmm).
20% lower power consumption in economy mode Edit
The Philips 298P4 has a power consumption in economy mode of 25.1WW, however the LG 32LS33 is a 30WW power consumption in economy mode PC monitor (4.9W higher).

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
Only one HDMI port Edit
The LG 32LS33 is a one HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the Philips 298P4 only has two HDMI ports.
Only DVI ports Edit
The LG 32LS33 has DVI ports, however the Philips 298P4 only has one DVI port.
Only one USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the LG 32LS33 is one, but the Philips 298P4 only has four USB Type-A downstream ports.
Higher power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The LG 32LS33 is a 30WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor. That's 4.9W higher than the Philips 298P4 (25.1WW).
Taller Edit
LG 32LS33 is 430.1mmmm tall, but the Philips 298P4 is a 330mmmm tall PC monitor (100.1mm shorter).
A bit wider Edit
LG 32LS33 is 730.9mmmm wide, but the Philips 298P4 is a 700mmmm wide PC monitor (30.9mm narrower).
Higher power consumption in economy mode Edit
The LG 32LS33 is a 30WW power consumption in economy mode PC monitor. That's 4.9W higher than the Philips 298P4 (25.1WW).
6 Reasons Against
9% smaller screen size Edit
The Philips 298P4 is a 29"" PC monitor. That's 2.55" smaller than the LG 32LS33 (29""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller display diagonal Edit
The Philips 298P4 is a 73cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 8.3cm smaller than the LG 32LS33 (73cmcm).
Only USB 2.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 2.0 ports on the Philips 298P4 is , but the LG 32LS33 only has one USB 2.0 port. Read more

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Having a number of USB 2.0 ports on your monitor is particularly useful for laptops where you frequently disconnect the laptop from the monitor. Just one USB connection from your laptop to your monitor will immediately connect all your other USB devices that are attached to the monitor.

A little heavier Edit
The Philips 298P4 has a weight of 5.7kgg, but the LG 32LS33 is a 5.6kgg weight PC monitor (0.1g lighter).
Slightly deeper Edit
Philips 298P4 is 59mmmm deep, but the LG 32LS33 is a 55.5mmmm deep PC monitor (3.5mm shallower).
Older by over one year
The Philips 298P4 is 14 months older than the LG 32LS33.

Awards

No awards found 18 Awards
01net.com: 5 Star
3dnews.ru: Recommended
almodi.org: Recommended Buy
benchmark.pl: Good Product
Digital Versus: 5 Star
f1cd.ru: Recommended
gizmaniak.pl: Good Buy
hardzone.es: Platinum
HEXUS.net: Innovation
hwlegend.com: Platinum
in4.pl: Recommended
Les Numeriques.com: 5 Star
pcfoster.pl: Recommended
pcgameware.co.uk: Silver
pcmasters.de: 90% Award
techno-labs.com: High Performance
tweaks.pl: Excellent Value
xtremehardware.com: Gold

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

31 months Ago 46 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 47.20
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.40
Total running cost $ 48.60

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.32T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.32 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
31.55"
BEST
29"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 20000000:1
 20000000:1
BEST
Display Type
 LCD
 LCD
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 2560 x 1080
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 2560 x 1080
BEST
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 283.82mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 672.76mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 90
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.2628 x 0.2628
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1200:1
BEST
 1200:1
Display Diagonal
81.3cm
BEST
73cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
9ms 14ms
BEST
SmartResponse
Unknown - Click to provide data 5ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 21:9
 16:9
 21:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 1
RS-232 Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 2.0 Port
1
BEST
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 4
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
1
BEST
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 4
USB Type-A Downstream Port
1 4
BEST
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 4W
Loudspeaker
2 2

Design

Recyclable Material Percentage
Unknown - Click to provide data 65%
Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Black
 Black
Heavy Metal Free Design
 Hg (mercury)
 Hg (mercury)

Performance

Mean Time Between Failures
Unknown - Click to provide data 30h

Networking

Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 150mm
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -5 - 20
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -65 - 65
On Screen Display Language
 CHI (SIMPL)
 RUS
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 POR
 ESP
 CHI (SIMPL)
 RUS
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 POR
 ESP
BEST
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data 8

Power

Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
30W 25.1W
BEST
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W
BEST
Typical Power Consumption
45W 38.5W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Maximum Power Consumption
45W Unknown - Click to provide data
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 3658
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 EPEAT Gold
 RoHS
 TCO
 EPEAT Gold
BEST
Electromagnetic Compatibility
 CE
 FCC
 ACE
 KCC
 CCC
 CE
 FCC
 ACE
 KCC
 CCC
Compliance Industry Standard
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 18.61lbs
Package Weight
7.1kg 11.7kg
BEST
Packaging Height
505mm
BEST
506mm
Packaging Depth
139mm
BEST
186mm
Packaging Width
812mm 782mm
BEST
Bezel Width At Bottom
14mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Bezel Width At Top
10.5mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Bezel Width On Side
10mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
5.8kg
BEST
8.5kg
Height With Stand
480.2mm
BEST
538mm
Depth With Stand
207mm
BEST
273mm
Width With Stand
730.9mm 700mm
BEST
Weight
5.6kg
BEST
5.7kg
Height
430.1mm 330mm
BEST
Depth
55.5mm
BEST
59mm
Width
730.9mm 700mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 AC
 VGA
 AC

Other Features

Package Dimensions
Unknown - Click to provide data 30.8 x 19.9 x 7.3
Power Consumption in Economy Mode
30W 25.1W
BEST
Power Consumption When Active
Unknown - Click to provide data 38.5W
SmartImage
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Package Dimensions
Unknown - Click to provide data 782 x 506 x 186
Recyclable Packaging Material
Unknown - Click to provide data 100
Feedback