HP EliteDisplay S240 vs Samsung S24C450

(33)
HP EliteDisplay S240
Samsung S24C450

Top Prices

Overstock
Antonline
Delivery unknown
In stock (14 available)
MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock
No prices found

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
39% bigger viewable height Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 is a 527mm viewable height PC monitor. That's 203mm bigger than the Samsung S24C450 (324mmmm).
11% wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° wider than the Samsung S24C450 (160°°).
Slightly wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°, however the Samsung S24C450 is only a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m², however the Samsung S24C450 is only a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Four USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 is a four USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the Samsung S24C450 only has one USB Type-A downstream port.
Shallower Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 has a depth of 33.3mm. That's 23.4mm shallower than the Samsung S24C450 (56.7mmmm).
25.1mm narrower Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 is a 540.3mm wide PC monitor, whereas the Samsung S24C450 is a 565.4mmmm wide PC monitor (25.1mm wider).
5 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The Samsung S24C450 is a 24"" PC monitor. That's 0.2" bigger than the HP EliteDisplay S240 (24""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

1% bigger display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S24C450 is a 60.96cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.51cm bigger than the HP EliteDisplay S240 (60.96cmcm).
2ms faster response time Edit
The Samsung S24C450 has a response time of 5msms, but the HP EliteDisplay S240 is a 7ms response time PC monitor (2ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

1885x lighter Edit
The Samsung S24C450 has a weight of 3.5kgg, however the HP EliteDisplay S240 is a 6.6kg weight PC monitor (6.6kg heavier).
Shorter Edit
The Samsung S24C450 is a 333.2mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 30.6mm shorter than the HP EliteDisplay S240 (333.2mmmm).

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
Marginally smaller screen size Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 has a screen size of 23.8", however the Samsung S24C450 is a 24"" PC monitor (0.2" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

0.51cm smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 has a display diagonal of 60.45cm, however the Samsung S24C450 is a 60.96cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.51cm bigger).
Slower response time Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 is a 7ms response time PC monitor. That's 2ms slower than the Samsung S24C450 (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Vastly heavier Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 is a 6.6kg weight PC monitor. That's 6.6kg heavier than the Samsung S24C450 (3.5kgg).
Moderately taller Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S240 is a 363.8mm tall PC monitor, whereas the Samsung S24C450 is a 333.2mmmm tall PC monitor (30.6mm shorter).
9 Reasons Against
Vastly smaller viewable height Edit
The Samsung S24C450 has a viewable height of 324mmmm, however the HP EliteDisplay S240 is a 527mm viewable height PC monitor (203mm bigger).
12% narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Samsung S24C450 has a vertical viewing angle of 160°°, however the HP EliteDisplay S240 is a 178° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider).
Narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Samsung S24C450 is a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° narrower than the HP EliteDisplay S240 (170°°).
20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Samsung S24C450 is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the HP EliteDisplay S240 (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
Three less USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The Samsung S24C450 is a one USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the HP EliteDisplay S240 only has four USB Type-A downstream ports.
23.4mm deeper Edit
The Samsung S24C450 has a depth of 56.7mmmm, however the HP EliteDisplay S240 is a 33.3mm deep PC monitor (23.4mm shallower).
5% wider Edit
The Samsung S24C450 is a 565.4mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 25.1mm wider than the HP EliteDisplay S240 (565.4mmmm).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by eleven months
The Samsung S24C450 is eleven months older than the HP EliteDisplay S240.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

32 months Ago 42 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 42.83
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 45.16
Purchase price $ 273.99
Total cost of ownership $ 319.15
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.29T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.29 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
8
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Display

Screen Size
23.8" 24"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 3000000:1
BEST
 3000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Viewable Size Diagonal
296.4mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
527mm
BEST
324mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 518.4mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
24 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.2745 x 0.2745 0.27 x 0.27
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
BEST
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
160°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
170°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
60.45cm 60.96cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
Response Time
7ms 5ms
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

USB Version
 2.0
 2.0
DisplayPort
1 1
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
USB 3.0 Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 1
DVI-I Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1
BEST
USB Type-A Downstream Port
4
BEST
1
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
2W 2W
BEST
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver

Ergonomics

Cable Length
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5m
Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -1 - 95
Maximum Height Adjustment
130mm 130mm
BEST
Tilt Angle
-5 - 21 -3 - 25
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45

Power

Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 21W
Typical Power Consumption
35W 30W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.1W
BEST
Maximum Power Consumption
65W Unknown - Click to provide data
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
Electromagnetic Compatibility
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 C-Tick
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 C-Tick
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 6.6kg
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 188mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 407mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 639mm
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 5.2kg
Height With Stand
503.6mm 486.75mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
239.4mm 224mm
BEST
Width With Stand
540.3mm
BEST
565.4mm
Weight
6.6kg 3.5kg
BEST
Height
363.8mm 333.2mm
BEST
Depth
33.3mm
BEST
56.7mm
Width
540.3mm
BEST
565.4mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 AC
 VGA
 AC
BEST
Interface Adapters Included
 USB male - VGA female
 USB male - VGA female

Other Features

Placement
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
 Horizontal
 Vertical
 Horizontal/Vertical
Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Package Dimensions
Unknown - Click to provide data 628 x 43 x 188
Dimensions With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 554.80 x 224 x 512.25
Dimensions
Unknown - Click to provide data 554.8 x 54.2 x 359.35
Wireless Connection
Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback