LG 23MP55 vs Samsung S24C650

(20)
(4)
LG 23MP55
Samsung S24C650

Top Prices

No prices found No prices found

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
18.7W lower power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The LG 23MP55 is a 0.3WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor. That's 18.7W lower than the Samsung S24C650 (19WW).
Lighter Edit
The LG 23MP55 is a 2.9kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.9g lighter than the Samsung S24C650 (3.8kgg).
10.6mm narrower Edit
The LG 23MP55 has a width of 544mmmm, however the Samsung S24C650 is a 554.6mmmm wide PC monitor (10.6mm wider).
User reviews are appreciably better
Based on 19 user reviews, the LG 23MP55 has an average review score of 83%, but the Samsung S24C650 has an average rating of 67% (based on 3 reviews).
4 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The Samsung S24C650 is a 23.6"" PC monitor. That's 0.6" bigger than the LG 23MP55 (23.6""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

5% bigger display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S24C650 is a 60.96cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 2.56cm bigger than the LG 23MP55 (60.96cmcm).
Shorter Edit
The Samsung S24C650 has a height of 330.5mmmm. That's 1.5mm shorter than the LG 23MP55 (330.5mmmm).
4.55mm shallower Edit
Samsung S24C650 is 55.45mmmm deep, but the LG 23MP55 is a 60mmmm deep PC monitor (4.55mm deeper).

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
A bit smaller screen size Edit
The LG 23MP55 has a screen size of 23"", but the Samsung S24C650 is a 23.6"" PC monitor (0.6" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

2.56cm smaller display diagonal Edit
The LG 23MP55 has a display diagonal of 58.4cmcm, but the Samsung S24C650 is a 60.96cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (2.56cm bigger).
A little taller Edit
The LG 23MP55 has a height of 332mmmm, however the Samsung S24C650 is a 330.5mmmm tall PC monitor (1.5mm shorter).
Deeper Edit
LG 23MP55 is 60mmmm deep. That's 4.55mm deeper than the Samsung S24C650 (55.45mmmm).
5 Reasons Against
18.7W higher power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Samsung S24C650 has a power consumption when in PowerSave mode of 19WW, however the LG 23MP55 is a 0.3WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (18.7W lower).
Heavier Edit
The Samsung S24C650 has a weight of 3.8kgg, but the LG 23MP55 is a 2.9kgg weight PC monitor (0.9g lighter).
2% wider Edit
The Samsung S24C650 has a width of 554.6mmmm. That's 10.6mm wider than the LG 23MP55 (554.6mmmm).
Older by one year
The Samsung S24C650 is one year older than the LG 23MP55.
User review Rating is much Worse
The Samsung S24C650 only has an average user score of 67%, but the LG 23MP55 has an average user rating of 83% (based on 19 reviews).

Awards

No awards found 1 Award
Trusted Reviews: Recommended

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

32 months Ago 44 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 25.74
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.40
Total running cost $ 27.14
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

0.18T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.18 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Display

Screen Size
23" 23.6"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 5000000:1
BEST
 5000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Backlight Type
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
56 - 61 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 293.22mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 521.28mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
56 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.2652 x 0.2652 0.2715 x 0.2715
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
58.4cm 60.96cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms 5ms
Color Gamut
72% Unknown - Click to provide data
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Version
 2.0
 2.0
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
HDMI Port
1 1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 1W
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 8
 Windows 8

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -1 - 95
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 130mm
Tilt Angle
-3 - 20 -3 - 25
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45
On Screen Display Language
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 GRE
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 KOR
 IND
BEST
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 GRE
 UKR
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 KOR
 IND
OSD Language
17 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.3W
BEST
19W
Power Consumption When Off
0.3W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
21W
BEST
35W
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W 0.3W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 49.6kWh
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
4.5kg
BEST
6.9kg
Packaging Height
400mm 185mm
BEST
Packaging Depth
124mm
BEST
406mm
Packaging Width
612mm
BEST
632mm
Weight With Stand
3.2kg
BEST
5.5kg
Height With Stand
436mm
BEST
487.35mm
Depth With Stand
188mm
BEST
224mm
Width With Stand
544mm
BEST
554.6mm
Weight
2.9kg
BEST
3.8kg
Height
332mm 330.5mm
BEST
Depth
60mm 55.45mm
BEST
Width
544mm
BEST
554.6mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 AC
 VGA
 AC

Other Features

Compatibility
Unknown - Click to provide data Mac
Feedback