Samsung S27D590 vs Samsung S27E390H

(99)
(105)
Samsung S27D590
Samsung S27E390H

Top Prices

Amazon US
Delivery unknown
Amazon US
Out of stock
PC Rush
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
0.099999999999994cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has a display diagonal of 68.6cmcm, however the Samsung S27E390H is only a 68.5cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.099999999999994cm smaller).
Two HDMI ports Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has two HDMI ports, however the Samsung S27E390H only has one HDMI port.
Lighter Edit
The Samsung S27D590 is a 4.4kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.2g lighter than the Samsung S27E390H (4.6kgg).
User reviews are better
Based on 79 user reviews, the Samsung S27D590 has an average review score of 91%, however the Samsung S27E390H has an average rating of 86% (based on 104 reviews).
5 Reasons For
Faster response time Edit
The Samsung S27E390H is a 4msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the Samsung S27D590 (4msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Lower annual energy consumption Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has an annual energy consumption of 37kWhkWh, but the Samsung S27D590 is a 44kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (7kWh higher).
1W lower maximum power consumption Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has a maximum power consumption of 29WW, however the Samsung S27D590 is a 30WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (1W higher).
$132 cheaper
The Samsung S27E390H costs $132.03 less than the Samsung S27D590.
Available from 1 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product.

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The Samsung S27D590 is a 5msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms slower than the Samsung S27E390H (4msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has an annual energy consumption of 44kWhkWh, but the Samsung S27E390H is a 37kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (7kWh lower).
1W higher maximum power consumption Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has a maximum power consumption of 30WW, however the Samsung S27E390H is a 29WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (1W lower).
$132 more expensive
The Samsung S27D590 is more expensive than the Samsung S27E390H by $132.03.
Less retailers
Only 1 shop sell the Samsung S27D590, whereas 2 retailers sell the Samsung S27E390H. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
One year older
The Samsung S27D590 is older than the Samsung S27E390H by one year.
4 Reasons Against
0.099999999999994cm smaller display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has a display diagonal of 68.5cmcm, however the Samsung S27D590 is a 68.6cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.099999999999994cm bigger).
Only one HDMI port Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has one HDMI port, however the Samsung S27D590 only has two HDMI ports.
Heavier Edit
The Samsung S27E390H is a 4.6kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.2g heavier than the Samsung S27D590 (4.6kgg).
Lower user review Score
The Samsung S27E390H's average user rating is 86%, however the Samsung S27D590's is 91% (based on 79 reviews).

Awards

4 Awards
3dnews.ru: Innovative Design
gagadget.com: Recommended
ixbt.com: Original Design
vido.com.ua: Recommended
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

34 months Ago 22 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data

Display

Screen Size
27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Gloss
 Gloss
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
56 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 81 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 336.3mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 597.9mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.3114 x 0.3114 0.3114 x 0.3114
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.6cm
BEST
68.5cm
Display Technology
 PLS
 PLS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms 4ms
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Brightness (min)
Unknown - Click to provide data 240

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 1
DisplayPort
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
2
BEST
1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
10W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black
Heavy Metal Free Design
 Hg (mercury)
 Hg (mercury)

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-1 - 15 -2 - 15
Automatic Shut Off
1 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 17.8W
Typical Power Consumption
23W
BEST
25W
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W 0.3W
Annual Energy Consumption
44kWh 37kWh
BEST
Maximum Power Consumption
30W 29W
BEST
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
Power Consumption (DPMS)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 95 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 45 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
10 - 40 10 - 40

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
6.8kg 6.6kg
BEST
Packaging Height
132mm
BEST
140mm
Packaging Depth
439mm
BEST
442mm
Packaging Width
689mm
BEST
703mm
Weight With Stand
5kg 5.1kg
BEST
Height With Stand
465mm 452.9mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
169.2mm
BEST
181.9mm
Width With Stand
619.5mm
BEST
626mm
Weight
4.4kg
BEST
4.6kg
Height
388.6mm 377.2mm
Depth
58.5mm 70.8mm
Width
619.5mm 626mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 HDMI
 VGA
 HDMI
 VGA

Technical Details

Samsung Magic Function
Unknown - Click to provide data MagicBright, MagicUpscale
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 597.9 x 336.3
Feedback