Acer GN246HL vs Asus VG248QE vs Benq RL2455 vs Benq RL2460

(155)
(357)
(304)
Acer GN246HL
Asus VG248QE
Benq RL2455
Benq RL2460

Top Prices

Newegg UK
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
B&H Photo
Delivery unknown
In stock
Newegg UK
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Factory Outlet Store
In stock
Newegg UK
eBay
Standard delivery: $4.77
In stock (33 available)
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
No prices found

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
1% bigger display diagonal Edit
The Acer GN246HL is a 61cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.039999999999999cm bigger than the Benq RL2455 ().
Brighter display brightness Edit
The Acer GN246HL is a 350 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the Asus VG248QE. That's 100 cd/m² brighter than the Benq RL2455 and the Benq RL2460 (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
12% lower power consumption when off Edit
The Acer GN246HL is a 0.45WW power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.05W lower than the Asus VG248QE and the Benq RL2455 ().
2.6g lighter Edit
The Acer GN246HL has a weight of 3.5kgg, whereas the Asus VG248QE is a 5.5kgg weight PC monitor (2g heavier), the Benq RL2455 is a 4.1kgg weight PC monitor (0.6g heavier) and the Benq RL2460 is a 6.1kgg weight PC monitor (2.6g heavier).
5 Reasons For
Brighter display brightness Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a 350 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the Acer GN246HL. That's 100 cd/m² brighter than the Benq RL2455 and the Benq RL2460 (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
6 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Twelve more awards
The Asus VG248QE has 13 awards from expert review sites, but the Acer GN246HL has 1 award and the Benq RL2455 has 1 award.
Better expert reviews
Based on 38 reviews, the average expert review score of the Asus VG248QE is 78%, whereas the average rating of the Acer GN246HL is 60% (based on 4 reviews) and the average rating of the Benq RL2455 is 70% (based on 9 reviews).
A little better user reviews
Based on 319 reviews, the average user review score of the Asus VG248QE is 94%, whereas the average rating of the Acer GN246HL is 87% (based on 151 reviews) and the average rating of the Benq RL2455 is 92% (based on 295 reviews).
2 Reasons For
One more HDMI port Edit
The Benq RL2455 is a two HDMI port PC monitor (as does the Benq RL2460), whereas the Asus VG248QE only has one HDMI port.
Cheaper by $29
The Benq RL2455 is $29 cheaper than the Acer GN246HL and $61 cheaper than the Asus VG248QE.
1 Reason For
One more HDMI port Edit
The Benq RL2460 has two HDMI ports (as does the Benq RL2455), however the Asus VG248QE only has one HDMI port.

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
One less HDMI port Edit
The Acer GN246HL is a one HDMI port PC monitor (as does the Asus VG248QE), whereas the Benq RL2460 only has two HDMI ports.
More expensive by $29
The Acer GN246HL is $29 more expensive than the Benq RL2455.
Fewer sellers
The Acer GN246HL is only stocked by 4 retailers, but the Asus VG248QE is stocked by 10 sellers and the Benq RL2455 is stocked by 8 retailers. Read more
The fewer the number of sellers that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
Twelve less awards
The Acer GN246HL has only received 1 award, but the Asus VG248QE has received 13 awards.
Expert review Rating is much Worse
The average expert rating of the Acer GN246HL is only 60%, whereas the average expert rating of the Asus VG248QE is 78% (based on 38 reviews) and the Benq RL2455 is 70% (based on 9 reviews).
User review Rating is Worse
The average user rating of the Acer GN246HL is 87%, whereas the average user rating of the Asus VG248QE is 94% (based on 319 reviews) and the Benq RL2455 is 92% (based on 295 reviews).
5 Reasons Against
One less HDMI port Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a one HDMI port PC monitor (as does the Acer GN246HL), whereas the Benq RL2460 only has two HDMI ports.
Higher power consumption when off Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a 0.5WW power consumption when off PC monitor, and so does the Benq RL2455. That's 0.05W higher than the Acer GN246HL ().
2g heavier Edit
The Asus VG248QE has a weight of 5.5kgg, whereas the Acer GN246HL is a 3.5kgg weight PC monitor (2g lighter), the Benq RL2455 is a 4.1kgg weight PC monitor (1.4g lighter) and the Benq RL2460 is a 6.1kgg weight PC monitor (0.6g heavier).
More expensive by $61
The Asus VG248QE is $32 more expensive than the Acer GN246HL and $61 more expensive than the Benq RL2455.
Older by over one year
The Asus VG248QE is 23 months older than the Acer GN246HL, eight months older than the Benq RL2455 and 15 months older than the Benq RL2460.
9 Reasons Against
1% smaller display diagonal Edit
The Benq RL2455 is a 60.96cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.039999999999999cm smaller than the Acer GN246HL ().
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The Benq RL2455 is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the Benq RL2460. That's 100 cd/m² dimmer than the Acer GN246HL and the Asus VG248QE (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
Higher power consumption when off Edit
The Benq RL2455 is a 0.5WW power consumption when off PC monitor, and so does the Asus VG248QE. That's 0.05W higher than the Acer GN246HL ().
0.6g heavier Edit
The Benq RL2455 has a weight of 4.1kgg, whereas the Acer GN246HL is a 3.5kgg weight PC monitor (0.6g lighter), the Asus VG248QE is a 5.5kgg weight PC monitor (1.4g heavier) and the Benq RL2460 is a 6.1kgg weight PC monitor (2g heavier).
Fewer sellers
The Benq RL2455 is only stocked by 8 sellers, but the Asus VG248QE is stocked by 10 sellers. Read more
The fewer the number of sellers that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
Older by over one year
The Benq RL2455 is 15 months older than the Acer GN246HL and seven months older than the Benq RL2460.
Twelve less awards
The Benq RL2455 has only received 1 award, but the Asus VG248QE has received 13 awards.
Expert review Rating is Worse
The average expert rating of the Benq RL2455 is only 70%, whereas the average expert rating of the Asus VG248QE is 78% (based on 38 reviews).
User review Rating is moderately Worse
The average user rating of the Benq RL2455 is 92%, whereas the average user rating of the Asus VG248QE is 94% (based on 319 reviews).
4 Reasons Against
40% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Benq RL2460 is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the Benq RL2455. That's 100 cd/m² dimmer than the Acer GN246HL and the Asus VG248QE (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
A lot heavier Edit
The Benq RL2460 has a weight of 6.1kgg, however the Acer GN246HL is a 3.5kgg weight PC monitor (2.6g lighter), the Asus VG248QE is a 5.5kgg weight PC monitor (0.6g lighter) and the Benq RL2455 is a 4.1kgg weight PC monitor (2g lighter).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by eight months
The Benq RL2460 is eight months older than the Acer GN246HL.

Awards

1 Award
hardware.info: Bronze Award
13 Awards
01net.com: 5 Star
altomdata.dk: Recommended
elektroniktest.dk: Silver
hardware.info: Silver Award
hwa.com.tr: Player's Dream
kitguru.net: Worth Considering
moddingmx.com: Gold
ozeros.com: Recommended
profesionalreview.com: Gold
Techsweden.org: Value for Money
tomshardware.co.uk: Smart Buy
tomshardware.com: Smart Buy
xfastest.com: Innovation Award
1 Award
hwa.com.tr: Player's Dream
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

26 months Ago 49 months Ago 40 months Ago 34 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 0.37
Electricity cost - standby $ 125.78
Total running cost $ 126.15

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data No data
0.82T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.82 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
21
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
24" 24" 24" 24"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
 W-LED
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 144 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 140 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
299mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
531mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
56 - 144 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
31 - 160 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.276 x 0.276 0.2768 x 0.2768 0.276 x 0.276 0.276 x 0.276
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M 16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
160° 160° 160° 160°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
170° 170° 170° 170°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
61cm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 60.96cm Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
Display Brightness
350 cd/m²
BEST
350 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms 1ms 1ms 1ms
Color Gamut
72% Unknown - Click to provide data 72% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
92 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 1
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 1 2
BEST
2
BEST
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
DVI Port
1 1 1 1

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 4W 4W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black/Copper
 Black
 Black/Copper
 Black
 Black/Copper
 Black
 Black/Copper
Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black
Heavy Metal Free Design
 Hg (mercury)
 Hg (mercury)
 Hg (mercury)
 Hg (mercury)

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 8
 Windows 8 x64
 Windows 8 Pro
 Windows 8 Pro x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8
 Windows 8 x64
 Windows 8 Pro
 Windows 8 Pro x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8
 Windows 8 x64
 Windows 8 Pro
 Windows 8 Pro x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 8
 Windows 8 x64
 Windows 8 Pro
 Windows 8 Pro x64
 Windows 8 Enterprise
 Windows 8 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Mean Time Between Failures
30,000h Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 110mm
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 15 - 5 -5 - 15 -5 - 15
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 17 17

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
BEST
 B
 B
 B
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When Off
0.45W
BEST
0.5W 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
23W 45W 27W 0.3W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.49W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W 27W
Annual Energy Consumption
49kWh Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 120
 230
 120-230
 12
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 120
 230
 120-230
 12
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 120
 230
 120-230
 12
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 120
 230
 120-230
 12
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 MPR II
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 MPR II
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 MPR II
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 MPR II
 TCO

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
5.5kg
BEST
8.1kg 5.7kg 8.4kg
Packaging Height
417mm 413mm
BEST
420mm 422mm
Packaging Depth
154mm 221mm 134mm
BEST
230mm
Packaging Width
617mm
BEST
674mm 650mm 684mm
Weight With Stand
3.5kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 4.1kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height With Stand
400.9mm
BEST
499.9mm 435mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth With Stand
178.9mm
BEST
231mm 189mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Width With Stand
565mm
BEST
569.4mm 579mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight
3.5kg
BEST
5.5kg 4.1kg 6.1kg
Height
342.7mm 340.4mm 435mm 502mm
Depth
23.7mm 57.3mm 189mm 213mm
Width
565mm 569.4mm 579mm 579mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
BEST
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
BEST
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 VGA
 DVI
 AC

Other Features

Quantity
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Quantity Per Pallet
60 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback