DELL P2715Q vs Eizo FlexScan EV2736 vs LG 27UD68-P

(119)
(9)
Eizo FlexScan EV2736
LG 27UD68-P

Top Prices

B&H Photo
In stock
eBay
In stock, only 2 left!
Amazon US
Out of stock
No prices found
B&H Photo
In stock
eBay
In stock, only 3 left!
Amazon US
Out of stock

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
Brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL P2715Q is a 350 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the LG 27UD68-P. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Eizo FlexScan EV2736 (350 cd/m² cd/m²).
Two DisplayPorts Edit
The number of DisplayPorts on the DELL P2715Q is two, but the Eizo FlexScan EV2736 only has one DisplayPort. Read more

We do not know the number of DisplayPorts on the LG 27UD68-P. It is possible that it does not have any DisplayPorts.

One more USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The DELL P2715Q has four USB Type-A downstream ports, however the Eizo FlexScan EV2736 only has three USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the LG 27UD68-P. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

3 shops are selling it
The more sellers stock the product, the greater competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
5 Reasons For
0.33999999999997mm bigger viewable height Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2736 has a viewable height of 336mmmm, whereas the DELL P2715Q is only a 335.66mmmm viewable height PC monitor (0.33999999999997mm smaller).
1% bigger viewable width Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2736 is a 597mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 0.25999999999999mm bigger than the DELL P2715Q ().
Hugely more display colour count Edit
Eizo FlexScan EV2736 is 16.77MM display colours, but the DELL P2715Q is only a 1,070MM display colours PC monitor (15.77M less) and the LG 27UD68-P is only a 1,073.7MM display colours PC monitor (15.77M less).
15% higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2736 has a maximum height adjustment of 140mmmm, however the LG 27UD68-P is only a 120mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (20mm lower).
Considerably better user reviews
The average user review score of the Eizo FlexScan EV2736 is 100% based on 1 review, whereas the average rating of the DELL P2715Q is 88% (based on 117 reviews) and the average rating of the LG 27UD68-P is 82% (based on 9 reviews).
6 Reasons For
15% brighter display brightness Edit
The LG 27UD68-P has a display brightness of 350 cd/m² cd/m² (as does the DELL P2715Q), however the Eizo FlexScan EV2736 is only a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Faster response time Edit
The LG 27UD68-P is a 5msms response time PC monitor. That's 4ms faster than the DELL P2715Q (5msms) and 1ms faster than the Eizo FlexScan EV2736 (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two HDMI ports Edit
The LG 27UD68-P has two HDMI ports, however the DELL P2715Q only has one HDMI port. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports on the Eizo FlexScan EV2736. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports.

2x lower maximum power consumption Edit
The LG 27UD68-P has a maximum power consumption of 40WW, however the DELL P2715Q is a 95WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (55W higher) and the Eizo FlexScan EV2736 is a 67WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (27W higher).
5.4g lighter Edit
The LG 27UD68-P is a 4.5kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.5g lighter than the DELL P2715Q (4.5kgg) and 5.4g lighter than the Eizo FlexScan EV2736 (4.5kgg).
$15 cheaper
The LG 27UD68-P costs $14.99 less than the DELL P2715Q and costs $420.99 less than the Eizo FlexScan EV2736.

Reasons Against

12 Reasons Against
A bit smaller viewable height Edit
The DELL P2715Q has a viewable height of 335.66mmmm, but the Eizo FlexScan EV2736 is a 336mmmm viewable height PC monitor (0.33999999999997mm bigger).
Smaller viewable width Edit
The DELL P2715Q is a 596.74mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 0.25999999999999mm smaller than the Eizo FlexScan EV2736 ().
Less display colour count Edit
The DELL P2715Q has a display colour count of 1,070MM, however the Eizo FlexScan EV2736 is a 16.77MM display colours PC monitor (15.77M more) and the LG 27UD68-P is a 1,073.7MM display colours PC monitor (0M more).
1% smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL P2715Q is a 68.47cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.47cm bigger than the Eizo FlexScan EV2736 (68.58cmcm) and 0.11cm smaller than the LG 27UD68-P (68.58cmcm).
4ms slower response time Edit
The DELL P2715Q has a response time of 9msms, whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV2736 is a 6msms response time PC monitor (3ms faster) and the LG 27UD68-P is a 5msms response time PC monitor (4ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the DELL P2715Q is one, but the LG 27UD68-P only has two HDMI ports. Read more

We do not know the number of HDMI ports on the Eizo FlexScan EV2736. It is possible that it does not have any HDMI ports.

One less DVI port Edit
The DELL P2715Q is a DVI port PC monitor, whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV2736 only has one DVI port. Read more

We do not know the number of DVI ports on the LG 27UD68-P. It is possible that it does not have any DVI ports.

58% higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL P2715Q is a 95WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 28W higher than the Eizo FlexScan EV2736 (40WW) and 55W higher than the LG 27UD68-P (40WW).
0.5g heavier Edit
The DELL P2715Q has a weight of 5kgg, but the Eizo FlexScan EV2736 is a 9.9kgg weight PC monitor (4.9g heavier) and the LG 27UD68-P is a 4.5kgg weight PC monitor (0.5g lighter).
More expensive by $15
The DELL P2715Q is $14.99 more expensive than the LG 27UD68-P.
Older by over one year
The DELL P2715Q is 17 months older than the LG 27UD68-P.
User review Rating is much Worse
The DELL P2715Q has an average user score of 88%, but the Eizo FlexScan EV2736 has an average user rating of 100% (based on 1 review).
9 Reasons Against
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2736 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the DELL P2715Q and the LG 27UD68-P (350 cd/m² cd/m²).
17% slower response time Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2736 has a response time of 6msms, however the DELL P2715Q is a 9msms response time PC monitor (3ms slower) and the LG 27UD68-P is a 5msms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one DisplayPort Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2736 is a one DisplayPort PC monitor, whereas the DELL P2715Q only has two DisplayPorts. Read more

We do not know the number of DisplayPorts on the LG 27UD68-P. It is possible that it does not have any DisplayPorts.

One less USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Eizo FlexScan EV2736 is three, but the DELL P2715Q only has four USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the LG 27UD68-P. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

Higher maximum power consumption Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2736 is a 67WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 28W lower than the DELL P2715Q (40WW) and 27W higher than the LG 27UD68-P (40WW).
Significantly heavier Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2736 has a weight of 9.9kgg, whereas the DELL P2715Q is a 5kgg weight PC monitor (4.9g lighter) and the LG 27UD68-P is a 4.5kgg weight PC monitor (5.4g lighter).
More expensive by $421
The Eizo FlexScan EV2736 is $406 more expensive than the DELL P2715Q and $420.99 more expensive than the LG 27UD68-P.
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by over two years
The Eizo FlexScan EV2736 is seven months older than the DELL P2715Q and two years older than the LG 27UD68-P.
4 Reasons Against
Significantly less display colour count Edit
The LG 27UD68-P is a 1,073.7MM display colours PC monitor. That's 0M less than the DELL P2715Q (1,073.7MM) and 15.77M less than the Eizo FlexScan EV2736 (1,073.7MM).
Lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The LG 27UD68-P is a 120mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 20mm lower than the Eizo FlexScan EV2736 (120mmmm).
Less retailers
Only 5 retailers sells the LG 27UD68-P, whereas 8 stores sell the DELL P2715Q. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Appreciably Lower user review Score
The LG 27UD68-P's average user rating is 82%, however the DELL P2715Q's is 88% (based on 117 reviews) and the Eizo FlexScan EV2736's is 100% (based on 1 review).

Awards

1 Award
Digitaltrends.com: Editor's Choice
1 Award
megaobzor.com/: Recommended
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

25 months Ago 31 months Ago 8 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data No data

Display

Screen Size
27" 27" 27"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 5000000:1
 5000000:1
 5000000:1
BEST
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 2160p
BEST
 2160p
 2160p
BEST
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 59 - 61 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 31 - 89 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 685mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
335.66mm 336mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
596.74mm 597mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 61
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 135
Pixel Pitch
0.1554 x 0.1554 0.233 x 0.233 0.1557 x 0.1557
Display Colour Count
1,070M 16.77M
BEST
1,073.7M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.47cm 68cm
BEST
68.58cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
350 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
9ms 6ms 5ms
BEST
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 99%
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Brilliant Contrast
 Brilliant Contrast
 Brilliant Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPort
2
BEST
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 3 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 2
BEST
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Mini DisplayPort
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
1
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
4
BEST
3 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
Upstream Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Upstream Port Type
 USB Type-B
 USB Type-B
 USB Type-B

Design

Coloured Feet
 Silver
 Black
 Silver
 Black
 Silver
 Black
Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -172 - 172 Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 140mm
BEST
120mm
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 30 5 - 25
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display Language
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 ESP
 SWE
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 ESP
 SWE
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 ESP
 SWE
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data 6 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Input Current
1.8A Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Typical Power Consumption
50W 24W
BEST
29W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 47kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
95W 67W 40W
BEST
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 20 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 35 5 - 35 Unknown - Click to provide data

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
10.7kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 6.4kg
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 479mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 181mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 835mm
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 4.9kg
Height With Stand
423.86mm 560mm 177.8mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
203.86mm
BEST
250mm 431.8mm
Width With Stand
640.74mm 640mm 609.6mm
BEST
Weight
5kg 9.9kg 4.5kg
BEST
Height
379.66mm Unknown - Click to provide data 48.26mm
Depth
51.5mm Unknown - Click to provide data 355.6mm
Width
640.74mm 640mm 609.6mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 DVI
 HDMI
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 DVI
 HDMI
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 DVI
 HDMI

Technical Details

Country of Origin
 China
 China
 China
Display Type
 LCD
 TFT
 TFT-LCD
 LCD
 TFT
 TFT-LCD
 LCD
 TFT
 TFT-LCD
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 597.73 x 336.22
Feedback