Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display vs Asus PA279 vs Eizo FlexScan EV2750 vs Viewsonic VP2772

(42)
(180)
(12)
(107)
Apple 27 Thunderbolt Display
Asus PA279
Eizo FlexScan EV2750
Viewsonic VP2772

Top Prices

Mac of All Trades
Delivery unknown
Overstock
MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock
Adorama
Delivery unknown
In stock
B&H Photo
In stock
eBay
Standard delivery: $49.99
In stock, only 6 left!
Amazon US
Out of stock

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
95% more display colour count Edit
Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display is 16.77MM display colours, and so does the Eizo FlexScan EV2750. That's 15.77M more than the Asus PA279 ().
25 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display has a display brightness of 375 cd/m² cd/m², whereas the Asus PA279, the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 and the Viewsonic VP2772 are all only 350 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (25 cd/m² dimmer).
User reviews are better
The Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display has an average user review score of 100%, whereas the Asus PA279 has an average rating of 90% (based on 155 reviews) and the Viewsonic VP2772 has an average rating of 92% (based on 86 reviews).
8 Reasons For
One more DisplayPort Edit
The number of DisplayPorts on the Asus PA279 is two, but the Viewsonic VP2772 only has one DisplayPort. Read more

We do not know the number of DisplayPorts on the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display. It is possible that it does not have any DisplayPorts.

Six USB 3.0 ports Edit
The Asus PA279 has six USB 3.0 ports, however the Viewsonic VP2772 only has four USB 3.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 3.0 ports on the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display or the Eizo FlexScan EV2750. It is possible that they do not have any USB 3.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Six USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The Asus PA279 has six USB Type-A downstream ports, however the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display only has three USB Type-A downstream ports, the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 only has two USB Type-A downstream ports and the Viewsonic VP2772 only has four USB Type-A downstream ports.
Vastly higher RMS rated audio power Edit
The Asus PA279 has an RMS rated audio power of 6WW, however the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display is only a 49WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor (43W higher) and the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is only a 2WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor (4W lower). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Lower power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Asus PA279 is a 0.5WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor, and so does the Eizo FlexScan EV2750. That's 1.5W lower than the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display (41WW) and 40.5W lower than the Viewsonic VP2772 (41WW).
$8 cheaper
The Asus PA279 costs $749.00, whereas the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display is $1,299.00, the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is $989.00 and the Viewsonic VP2772 is $757.29.
Seven more awards
The Asus PA279 has 10 awards, however the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display has 7 awards, the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has 3 awards and the Viewsonic VP2772 has 5 awards.
Expert reviews are a little better
The Asus PA279 has an average expert review score of 91% based on 25 reviews, but the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display has an average rating of 79% (based on 41 reviews), the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has an average rating of 90% (based on 10 reviews) and the Viewsonic VP2772 has an average rating of 85% (based on 21 reviews).
7 Reasons For
Vastly more display colour count Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has a display colour count of 16.77MM (as does the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display), however the Asus PA279 is only a 1,073.7MM display colours PC monitor (15.77M less).
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 68.5cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.030000000000001cm bigger than the Asus PA279 ().
A bit higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has a maximum height adjustment of 155mmmm, whereas the Viewsonic VP2772 is only a 150mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (5mm lower).
40.5W lower power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has a power consumption when in PowerSave mode of 0.5WW (as does the Asus PA279), however the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display is a 2WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (1.5W higher) and the Viewsonic VP2772 is a 41WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (40.5W higher).
37% shorter Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has a height of 359mmmm. That's 132mm shorter than the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display (381mmmm), 20.68mm shorter than the Asus PA279 (381mmmm) and 22mm shorter than the Viewsonic VP2772 (381mmmm).
Narrower Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has a width of 611.6mmmm. That's 38.4mm narrower than the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display (642.6mmmm), 29.18mm narrower than the Asus PA279 (642.6mmmm) and 31mm narrower than the Viewsonic VP2772 (642.6mmmm).
Better user reviews
The average user review score of the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is 100% based on 2 reviews, but the average rating of the Asus PA279 is 90% (based on 155 reviews) and the average rating of the Viewsonic VP2772 is 92% (based on 86 reviews).
1 Reason For
6 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.

Reasons Against

9 Reasons Against
Only three USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display is three, but the Asus PA279 only has six USB Type-A downstream ports and the Viewsonic VP2772 only has four USB Type-A downstream ports.
75% higher power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display is a 2WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor. That's 1.5W higher than the Asus PA279 and the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 (41WW) and 39W lower than the Viewsonic VP2772 (41WW).
132mm taller Edit
Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display is 491mmmm tall, but the Asus PA279 is a 379.68mmmm tall PC monitor (111.32mm shorter), the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 359mmmm tall PC monitor (132mm shorter) and the Viewsonic VP2772 is a 381mmmm tall PC monitor (110mm shorter).
Moderately wider Edit
Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display is 650mmmm wide, but the Asus PA279 is a 640.78mmmm wide PC monitor (9.22mm narrower), the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 611.6mmmm wide PC monitor (38.4mm narrower) and the Viewsonic VP2772 is a 642.6mmmm wide PC monitor (7.4mm narrower).
$550 more expensive
The Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display is more expensive than the Asus PA279 by $550, more expensive than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 by $310 and more expensive than the Viewsonic VP2772 by $541.71.
Fewer sellers
Only 1 store sell the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display, but 2 stores sell the Asus PA279 and 7 stores sell the Viewsonic VP2772. Read more
The smaller the number of stores that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
Over three years older
The Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display is older than the Asus PA279 by eight months, older than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 by three years and older than the Viewsonic VP2772 by ten months.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display has received 7 awards, the Asus PA279 has received 10 awards.
A lot Lower expert review Score
The average expert rating of the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display is only 79%, whereas the average expert rating of the Asus PA279 is 91% (based on 25 reviews), the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is 90% (based on 10 reviews) and the Viewsonic VP2772 is 85% (based on 21 reviews).
11 Reasons Against
15.77M less display colour count Edit
The Asus PA279 has a display colour count of 1,073.7MM. That's 15.77M less than the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display and the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 ().
A bit smaller display diagonal Edit
The Asus PA279 has a display diagonal of 68.47cmcm, but the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 68.5cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.030000000000001cm bigger).
25 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The Asus PA279 has a display brightness of 350 cd/m² cd/m² (as do the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 and the Viewsonic VP2772), but the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display is a 375 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (25 cd/m² brighter).
1ms slower response time Edit
The Asus PA279 is a 6msms response time PC monitor. That's 6ms faster than the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display and the Viewsonic VP2772 (12msms) and 1ms slower than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 (12msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

50% heavier Edit
The Asus PA279 is a 10kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.8g lighter than the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display (5.5kgg), 4.9g heavier than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 (5.5kgg) and 4.5g heavier than the Viewsonic VP2772 (5.5kgg).
20.68mm taller Edit
The Asus PA279 has a height of 379.68mmmm, however the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display is a 491mmmm tall PC monitor (111.32mm taller), the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 359mmmm tall PC monitor (20.68mm shorter) and the Viewsonic VP2772 is a 381mmmm tall PC monitor (1.32mm taller).
31% deeper Edit
Asus PA279 is 69.5mmmm deep. That's 137.5mm shallower than the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display (56mmmm), 21mm deeper than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 (56mmmm) and 13.5mm deeper than the Viewsonic VP2772 (56mmmm).
Moderately wider Edit
The Asus PA279 has a width of 640.78mmmm, however the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display is a 650mmmm wide PC monitor (9.22mm wider), the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 611.6mmmm wide PC monitor (29.18mm narrower) and the Viewsonic VP2772 is a 642.6mmmm wide PC monitor (1.8200000000001mm wider).
Not as many stockists
Only 2 retailers sells the Asus PA279, however 7 shops sell the Viewsonic VP2772. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Over two years older
The Asus PA279 is older than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 by two years and older than the Viewsonic VP2772 by two months.
A lot Lower user review Score
The Asus PA279 has an average user rating of 90%, but the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display has an average user rating of 100% (based on 1 review), the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has an average user rating of 100% (based on 2 reviews) and the Viewsonic VP2772 has an average user rating of 92% (based on 86 reviews).
8 Reasons Against
8% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 350 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so do the Asus PA279 and the Viewsonic VP2772. That's 25 cd/m² dimmer than the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display (350 cd/m² cd/m²).
Only one DisplayPort Edit
The number of DisplayPorts on the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is one, and so does the Viewsonic VP2772, but the Asus PA279 only has two DisplayPorts. Read more

We do not know the number of DisplayPorts on the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display. It is possible that it does not have any DisplayPorts.

Four less USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has two USB Type-A downstream ports, however the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display only has three USB Type-A downstream ports, the Asus PA279 only has six USB Type-A downstream ports and the Viewsonic VP2772 only has four USB Type-A downstream ports.
Vastly lower RMS rated audio power Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 2WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor. That's 47W lower than the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display () and 4W lower than the Asus PA279 (). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

More expensive by $240
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is $240 more expensive than the Asus PA279 and $231.71 more expensive than the Viewsonic VP2772.
Not as many stockists
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is only stocked by 1 retailer, however the Asus PA279 is stocked by 2 stores and the Viewsonic VP2772 is stocked by 7 stores. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Seven less awards
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has only received 3 awards, however the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display has received 7 awards, the Asus PA279 has received 10 awards and the Viewsonic VP2772 has received 5 awards.
Expert review Rating is a bit Worse
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has an average expert score of 90%, but the Asus PA279 has an average expert rating of 91% (based on 25 reviews).
15 Reasons Against
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The Viewsonic VP2772 is a 350 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so do the Asus PA279 and the Eizo FlexScan EV2750. That's 25 cd/m² dimmer than the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display (350 cd/m² cd/m²).
Only one DisplayPort Edit
The Viewsonic VP2772 has one DisplayPort, and so does the Eizo FlexScan EV2750, however the Asus PA279 only has two DisplayPorts. Read more

We do not know the number of DisplayPorts on the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display. It is possible that it does not have any DisplayPorts.

Two less USB 3.0 ports Edit
The Viewsonic VP2772 is a four USB 3.0 port PC monitor, whereas the Asus PA279 only has six USB 3.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 3.0 ports on the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display or the Eizo FlexScan EV2750. It is possible that they do not have any USB 3.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Two less USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The Viewsonic VP2772 is a four USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the Asus PA279 only has six USB Type-A downstream ports.
5mm lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The Viewsonic VP2772 has a maximum height adjustment of 150mmmm, but the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 155mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (5mm higher).
40.5W higher power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Viewsonic VP2772 has a power consumption when in PowerSave mode of 41WW, whereas the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display is a 2WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (39W lower) and the Asus PA279 and the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 are both 0.5WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitors (40.5W lower).
0.4g heavier Edit
The Viewsonic VP2772 has a weight of 5.5kgg, however the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display is a 10.8kgg weight PC monitor (5.3g heavier), the Asus PA279 is a 10kgg weight PC monitor (4.5g heavier) and the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 5.1kgg weight PC monitor (0.4g lighter).
Taller Edit
The Viewsonic VP2772 is a 381mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 110mm shorter than the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display (381mmmm), 1.32mm taller than the Asus PA279 (381mmmm) and 22mm taller than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 (381mmmm).
14% deeper Edit
The Viewsonic VP2772 has a depth of 56mmmm, however the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display is a 207mmmm deep PC monitor (151mm deeper), the Asus PA279 is a 69.5mmmm deep PC monitor (13.5mm deeper) and the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 48.5mmmm deep PC monitor (7.5mm shallower).
5% wider Edit
The Viewsonic VP2772 is a 642.6mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 7.4mm narrower than the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display (642.6mmmm), 1.8200000000001mm wider than the Asus PA279 (642.6mmmm) and 31mm wider than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 (642.6mmmm).
More expensive by $8
The Viewsonic VP2772 is $8.29 more expensive than the Asus PA279.
Older by over two years
The Viewsonic VP2772 is two years older than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750.
Five less awards
The Viewsonic VP2772 has only received 5 awards, whereas the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display has received 7 awards and the Asus PA279 has received 10 awards.
Expert review Rating is Worse
The Viewsonic VP2772's average expert score is 85%, however the Asus PA279's is 91% (based on 25 reviews) and the Eizo FlexScan EV2750's is 90% (based on 10 reviews).
User review Rating is Worse
The Viewsonic VP2772's average user score is 92%, however the Apple 27" Thunderbolt Display's is 100% (based on 1 review) and the Eizo FlexScan EV2750's is 100% (based on 2 reviews).

Awards

7 Awards
3dnews.ru: Innovative Design
CNET.com: Editor's Choice
Cnetfrance.fr: Editor's Choice
computershopper.com: Editor's Choice
f1cd.ru: Recommended
MacPro.se: Recommended
PC Mag: Editor's Choice
10 Awards
01net.com: 5 Star
3dnews.ru: Editor's Choice
chinese.vr-zone.com: Editor's Choice
compress.ru: Recommended
Digital Versus: 5 Star
focus-numerique.fr: Recommended
hispazone.com: Best for High End
kitguru.net: Must Have
Les Numeriques.com: 5 Star
technopat.net: Editor's Choice
3 Awards
hardwareluxx.de: Excellent Hardware
hardwareluxx.ru: Excellent Hardware
xtremehardware.com: Silver
5 Awards
alphr.com: Recommended
Digital Versus: 5 Star
Les Numeriques.com: 5 Star
pcauthority.com.au: Recommended
Trusted Reviews: Recommended

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

50 months Ago 42 months Ago 14 months Ago 40 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 26.97
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 26.97
Purchase price $ 989.00
Total cost of ownership $ 1,015.97
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data
0.17T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.17 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
4
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Display

Screen Size
27" 27" 27" 27"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
 100000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 49 - 86 59 - 61 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 29 - 113 31 - 89 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 335.7mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 596.7mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.233 x 0.233 0.233 x 0.233 Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Colour Count
16.77M
BEST
1,073.7M 16.77M
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 68.47cm 68.5cm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
375 cd/m²
BEST
350 cd/m² 350 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
Response Time
12ms
BEST
6ms 5ms 12ms
BEST
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours

Ports & Interfaces

Thunderbolt Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Firewire (IEEE 1394) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
BEST
1 1
USB 2.0 Port
3 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 6
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 4
HDMI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 1
Mini DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 6 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
3 6
BEST
2 4
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)

Multimedia

Audio System
2.1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Audio Power
49W 6W
BEST
2W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Coloured Feet
 White
 White
 White
 White
Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Performance

Compatible Memory Card
 Memory Stick (MS)
 MS PRO
 MS PRO Duo
 MS Pro-HG
 SD
 SDHC
 SDXC
 MSXC
 MMC+
 Memory Stick (MS)
 MS PRO
 MS PRO Duo
 MS Pro-HG
 SD
 SDHC
 SDXC
 MSXC
 MMC+
 Memory Stick (MS)
 MS PRO
 MS PRO Duo
 MS Pro-HG
 SD
 SDHC
 SDXC
 MSXC
 MMC+
 Memory Stick (MS)
 MS PRO
 MS PRO Duo
 MS Pro-HG
 SD
 SDHC
 SDXC
 MSXC
 MMC+

Networking

Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 155mm
BEST
150mm
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -5 - 20 5 - 35 -5 - 23
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 344 -60 - 60
On Screen Display Language
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
BEST
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 11 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
2W 0.5W
BEST
0.5W
BEST
41W
Typical Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 49W 22W
BEST
65W
Maximum Power Consumption
250W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 67W Unknown - Click to provide data
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
20 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80 20 - 90
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 47 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
10 - 35 Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 35 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 14kg Unknown - Click to provide data 11.7kg
BEST
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 456mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 577mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 300mm Unknown - Click to provide data 259mm
BEST
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 756mm Unknown - Click to provide data 739mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 7.9kg
BEST
8.5kg
Height With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 559.84mm 545.2mm 464.8mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 240mm
BEST
245mm 348mm
Width With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 640.78mm 611.6mm
BEST
642.6mm
Weight
10.8kg
BEST
10kg 5.1kg 5.5kg
Height
491mm 379.68mm 359mm
BEST
381mm
Depth
207mm
BEST
69.5mm 48.5mm 56mm
Width
650mm 640.78mm 611.6mm
BEST
642.6mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 AC
 USB
 HDMI
 DVI
 DisplayPort
 AC
 USB
 HDMI
 DVI
 DisplayPort
 AC
 USB
 HDMI
 DVI
 DisplayPort
 AC
 USB
 HDMI
 DVI
 DisplayPort
Feedback