Asus PG348Q vs Eizo ColorEdge CS270

(14)
Asus PG348Q
Eizo ColorEdge CS270

Top Prices

Best Buy
In stock
eBay
In stock, only 8 left!
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock (198 available)
Adorama
Out of stock
MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
7" bigger screen size Edit
The Asus PG348Q is a 34"" PC monitor. That's 7" bigger than the Eizo ColorEdge CS270 (27""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

18.72cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The Asus PG348Q is an 86.72cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 18.72cm bigger than the Eizo ColorEdge CS270 (68cmcm).
0.2W lower power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Asus PG348Q has a power consumption when in PowerSave mode of 0.5WW, but the Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is a 0.7WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (0.2W higher).
Significantly shorter Edit
Asus PG348Q is 109mmmm tall. That's 293mm shorter than the Eizo ColorEdge CS270 (402mmmm).
Cheaper by $80
The Asus PG348Q is $80 cheaper than the Eizo ColorEdge CS270.
5 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
3 Reasons For
Higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CS270 has a maximum height adjustment of 148mmmm, but the Asus PG348Q is only a 115mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (33mm lower).
Narrower Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is a 646mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 183mm narrower than the Asus PG348Q (646mmmm).
Better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is 95%, however the average rating of the Asus PG348Q is 90% (based on 1 review).

Reasons Against

3 Reasons Against
33mm lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The Asus PG348Q has a maximum height adjustment of 115mmmm, however the Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is a 148mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (33mm higher).
Wider Edit
Asus PG348Q is 829mmmm wide. That's 183mm wider than the Eizo ColorEdge CS270 (646mmmm).
Expert review Rating is Worse
The average expert rating of the Asus PG348Q is 90%, whereas the average expert rating of the Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is 95% (based on 3 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
26% smaller screen size Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is a 27"" PC monitor. That's 7" smaller than the Asus PG348Q (27""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller display diagonal Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is a 68cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 18.72cm smaller than the Asus PG348Q (68cmcm).
A lot higher power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CS270 has a power consumption when in PowerSave mode of 0.7WW, whereas the Asus PG348Q is a 0.5WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (0.2W lower).
73% taller Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is a 402mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 293mm taller than the Asus PG348Q (402mmmm).
More expensive by $80
The Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is $80 more expensive than the Asus PG348Q.
Less retailers
The Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is only stocked by 2 shops, whereas the Asus PG348Q is stocked by 7 retailers. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by seven months
The Eizo ColorEdge CS270 is seven months older than the Asus PG348Q.

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

12 months Ago 19 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 41.68
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 44.01
Purchase price $ 1,179.99
Total cost of ownership $ 1,224.00
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.29T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.29 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
34"
BEST
27"
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
Backlight Type
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
Video Mode
 1080i
 1080p
 720p
 576i
 576p
 480i
 480p
 1080i
 1080p
 720p
 576i
 576p
 480i
 480p
BEST
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 335.6mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 596.7mm
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
Pixel Pitch
0.2325 x 0.2325 0.2331 x 0.2331
Display Colour Count
1,073.7M
BEST
1,070M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
86.72cm
BEST
68cm
Display Technology
 LED
 LED
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms 15ms
BEST
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 99%
Screen Shape
 Curved
 Curved
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 16:9
 21:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 1.073 billion colours
 1.073 billion colours
Pixel Density
Unknown - Click to provide data 109

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPort
1 1
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 4
HDMI Port
1 1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Type-A Downstream Port
4 4
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
4W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
115mm 148mm
BEST
Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 -5 - 35
Swivel Angle Range
50 - -50 -172 - 172
On Screen Display Language
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
BEST
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data 9

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.5W
BEST
0.7W
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 34W
Standby Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 53kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
100W
BEST
86W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 RoHS
Compliance Industry Standard
 Rohs
 Rohs
BEST

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
15.5kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Height
508mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Depth
942mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
320mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
14.9kg 10.6kg
BEST
Height With Stand
297mm
BEST
561mm
Depth With Stand
559mm 245mm
BEST
Width With Stand
829mm 646mm
BEST
Weight
11.1kg
BEST
7.7kg
Height
109mm
BEST
402mm
Depth
323mm
BEST
72.5mm
Width
829mm 646mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 HDMI
 DisplayPort
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 HDMI
 DisplayPort
 DVI
 AC
Feedback