Eizo RadiForce MX242W vs HP ENVY 34

Eizo RadiForce MX242W
HP ENVY 34

Top Prices

MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock
Amazon US
Out of stock
Walmart
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
Faster response time Edit
The Eizo RadiForce MX242W is a 12msms response time PC monitor. That's 2ms faster than the HP ENVY 34 (14msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Lighter Edit
The Eizo RadiForce MX242W is a 6kgg weight PC monitor. That's 2g lighter than the HP ENVY 34 (8kgg).
375.8mm narrower Edit
The Eizo RadiForce MX242W is a 575mmmm wide PC monitor, whereas the HP ENVY 34 is a 950.8mmmm wide PC monitor (375.8mm wider).
$234 cheaper
The Eizo RadiForce MX242W costs $233.96 less than the HP ENVY 34.
7 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is a 34"" PC monitor. That's 9.9" bigger than the Eizo RadiForce MX242W (34""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Moderately bigger viewable height Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has a viewable height of 333.7mmmm, however the Eizo RadiForce MX242W is only a 324mmmm viewable height PC monitor (9.7mm smaller).
Bigger viewable width Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is a 749.9mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 231.5mm bigger than the Eizo RadiForce MX242W (749.9mmmm).
15.77M more display colour count Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is a 16.77MM display colours PC monitor, whereas the Eizo RadiForce MX242W is only a 1,070MM display colours PC monitor (15.77M less).
30% bigger display diagonal Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is an 86.36cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 25.36cm bigger than the Eizo RadiForce MX242W (86.36cmcm).
Shorter Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is a 374.1mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 23.9mm shorter than the Eizo RadiForce MX242W (374.1mmmm).
1 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
A lot smaller screen size Edit
The Eizo RadiForce MX242W has a screen size of 24.1"", however the HP ENVY 34 is a 34"" PC monitor (9.9" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

3% smaller viewable height Edit
The Eizo RadiForce MX242W is a 324mmmm viewable height PC monitor. That's 9.7mm smaller than the HP ENVY 34 (333.7mmmm).
A lot smaller viewable width Edit
The Eizo RadiForce MX242W has a viewable width of 518.4mmmm, whereas the HP ENVY 34 is a 749.9mmmm viewable width PC monitor (231.5mm bigger).
Significantly less display colour count Edit
The Eizo RadiForce MX242W is a 1,070MM display colours PC monitor. That's 15.77M less than the HP ENVY 34 (16.77MM).
25.36cm smaller display diagonal Edit
The Eizo RadiForce MX242W has a display diagonal of 61cmcm, however the HP ENVY 34 is an 86.36cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (25.36cm bigger).
Moderately taller Edit
The Eizo RadiForce MX242W is a 398mmmm tall PC monitor, whereas the HP ENVY 34 is a 374.1mmmm tall PC monitor (23.9mm shorter).
Less retailers
Only 1 store sell the Eizo RadiForce MX242W, whereas 2 shops sell the HP ENVY 34. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
5 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has a response time of 14msms, but the Eizo RadiForce MX242W is a 12msms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less DVI port Edit
The number of DVI ports on the HP ENVY 34 is , but the Eizo RadiForce MX242W only has one DVI port.
25% heavier Edit
The HP ENVY 34 has a weight of 8kgg, however the Eizo RadiForce MX242W is a 6kgg weight PC monitor (2g lighter).
40% wider Edit
The HP ENVY 34 is a 950.8mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 375.8mm wider than the Eizo RadiForce MX242W (950.8mmmm).
More expensive by $234
The HP ENVY 34 is $233.96 more expensive than the Eizo RadiForce MX242W.

Awards

No awards found 1 Award
PC Mag: Editor's Choice

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

23 months Ago 24 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 76.01
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.24
Total running cost $ 78.25
Purchase price $ 1,993.95
Total cost of ownership $ 2,072.20
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.51T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.51 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
13
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
24.1" 34"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1200
BEST
 1920 x 1200
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 10000000:1
 10000000:1
BEST
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 3440 x 1440
 3440 x 1440
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1440p
 1440p
BEST
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
Digital Vertical Frequency
26 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
31 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
324mm 333.7mm
BEST
Viewable Width
518.4mm 749.9mm
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 16:10
Pixel Pitch
0.270 x 0.270 0.232 x 0.232
Display Colour Count
1,070M 16.77M
BEST
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 3000:1
 3000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
61cm 86.36cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
350 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
Response Time
12ms
BEST
14ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 99%
Screen Shape
 Curved
 Curved
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 21:9
BEST
 16:10
 21:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
Unknown - Click to provide data 110

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPort
1 1
USB 2.0 Port
3 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 3
HDMI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
DVI-I Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1
BEST
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 3
USB Type-A Downstream Port
3 3
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)

Multimedia

Audio System
Unknown - Click to provide data DTS Audio
RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 12W
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Maximum Height Adjustment
130mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
0 - 35 -5 - 25
Swivel Angle Range
-172 - 172 -180 - 180
OSD Language
9 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Input Current
Unknown - Click to provide data 10A
Energy Efficiency Class
 C
 C
BEST
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.43W
Typical Power Consumption
31W
BEST
62W
Standby Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.48W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 91kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
68W 150W
BEST
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 3050
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 4570
Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 90
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 70
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 35

Certificates

Compliance Industry Standard
 Rohs
BEST
 Rohs
EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
8.7kg
BEST
9.8kg
Height With Stand
553mm 477.1mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
245mm 197.2mm
BEST
Width With Stand
575mm
BEST
950.8mm
Weight
6kg
BEST
8kg
Height
398mm 374.1mm
BEST
Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 93.9mm
Width
575mm
BEST
950.8mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 DVI
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
 AC
 MHL
 USB
 DVI
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
 AC
 MHL
Feedback