DELL E2016H vs DELL U2415 vs DELL U2417H

(169)
DELL E2016H
DELL U2415
DELL U2417H

Top Prices

No prices found
B&H Photo
In stock
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock
PC Rush
Delivery unknown
In stock (150 available)
B&H Photo
In stock
eBay
In stock, only 2 left!
Factory Outlet Store
In stock

Reasons For

2 Reasons For
60% faster response time Edit
The DELL E2016H is a 5ms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the DELL U2415 (8msms) and 3ms faster than the DELL U2417H (8msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

56W lower maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL E2016H has a maximum power consumption of 19W, however the DELL U2415 is a 75WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (56W higher) and the DELL U2417H is a 74WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (55W higher).
10 Reasons For
4.6" bigger screen size Edit
The DELL U2415 has a screen size of 24.1"", whereas the DELL E2016H is only a 19.5" PC monitor (4.6" smaller) and the DELL U2417H is only a 23.8"" PC monitor (0.3" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

A bit larger viewable size diagonal Edit
The DELL U2415 has a viewable size diagonal of 611mmmm, but the DELL U2417H is only a 604.7mmmm viewable size diagonal PC monitor (6.3mm smaller).
9% bigger viewable height Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 324mmmm viewable height PC monitor. That's 27.54mm bigger than the DELL U2417H (296.46mmmm).
18° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2417H. That's 18° wider than the DELL E2016H (178°°).
Marginally wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The DELL U2415 has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°° (as does the DELL U2417H), whereas the DELL E2016H is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
11.7cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2415 has a display diagonal of 61.1cmcm, whereas the DELL E2016H is only a 49.4cm display diagonal PC monitor (11.7cm smaller) and the DELL U2417H is only a 60.4cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.7cm smaller).
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL U2415 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² cd/m², whereas the DELL E2016H is only a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer) and the DELL U2417H is only a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
One more DisplayPort Edit
The DELL U2415 is a two DisplayPort PC monitor, whereas the DELL E2016H only has one DisplayPort and the DELL U2417H only has one DisplayPort.
Six USB 3.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 3.0 ports on the DELL U2415 is six, but the DELL U2417H only has two USB 3.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 3.0 ports on the DELL E2016H. It is possible that it does not have any USB 3.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Six USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the DELL U2415 is six, but the DELL U2417H only has four USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the DELL E2016H. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

6 Reasons For
Marginally bigger viewable width Edit
The DELL U2417H has a viewable width of 527.04mmmm, but the DELL U2415 is only a 518.4mmmm viewable width PC monitor (8.64mm smaller).
18° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The DELL U2417H is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 18° wider than the DELL E2016H (178°°).
A bit wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The DELL U2417H has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°° (as does the DELL U2415), whereas the DELL E2016H is only a 170° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
10% larger color gamut Edit
The DELL U2417H is a 96%% color gamut PC monitor. That's 10% larger than the DELL E2016H (96%%) and 5% larger than the DELL U2415 (96%%).
$20 cheaper
The DELL U2417H is $20 cheaper than the DELL U2415.
Available from 8 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.

Reasons Against

8 Reasons Against
24% smaller screen size Edit
The DELL E2016H has a screen size of 19.5", however the DELL U2415 is a 24.1"" PC monitor (4.6" bigger) and the DELL U2417H is a 23.8"" PC monitor (4.3" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

12% narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The DELL E2016H is a 160° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° narrower than the DELL U2415 and the DELL U2417H (178°°).
8° narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The DELL E2016H has a horizontal viewing angle of 170°, however the DELL U2415 and the DELL U2417H are both 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitors (8° wider).
24% smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL E2016H has a display diagonal of 49.4cm, however the DELL U2415 is a 61.1cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (11.7cm bigger) and the DELL U2417H is a 60.4cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (11cm bigger).
20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The DELL E2016H has a display brightness of 250 cd/m², however the DELL U2415 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter) and the DELL U2417H is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (0 cd/m² brighter).
12% smaller color gamut Edit
The DELL E2016H is an 86% color gamut PC monitor. That's 5% smaller than the DELL U2415 (96%%) and 10% smaller than the DELL U2417H (96%%).
One less DisplayPort Edit
The DELL E2016H has one DisplayPort (as does the DELL U2417H), however the DELL U2415 only has two DisplayPorts.
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
8 Reasons Against
A little smaller viewable width Edit
The DELL U2415 has a viewable width of 518.4mmmm, but the DELL U2417H is a 527.04mmmm viewable width PC monitor (8.64mm bigger).
17% slower response time Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 6msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms slower than the DELL E2016H (8msms) and 2ms faster than the DELL U2417H (8msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

6% smaller color gamut Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 91%% color gamut PC monitor. That's 5% larger than the DELL E2016H (96%%) and 5% smaller than the DELL U2417H (96%%).
56W higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL U2415 has a maximum power consumption of 75WW, whereas the DELL E2016H is a 19W maximum power consumption PC monitor (56W lower) and the DELL U2417H is a 74WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (1W lower).
0.7g heavier Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 4.3kgg weight PC monitor. That's 2.2kg lighter than the DELL E2016H (3.6kgg) and 0.7g heavier than the DELL U2417H (3.6kgg).
$20 more expensive
The DELL U2415 is more expensive than the DELL U2417H by $20.
Fewer sellers
Only 4 sellers sells the DELL U2415, but 12 retailers sell the DELL U2417H. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
Over one year older
The DELL U2415 is older than the DELL E2016H by 20 months and older than the DELL U2417H by 17 months.
11 Reasons Against
A little smaller screen size Edit
The DELL U2417H has a screen size of 23.8"", whereas the DELL E2016H is a 19.5" PC monitor (4.3" smaller) and the DELL U2415 is a 24.1"" PC monitor (0.3" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Slightly smaller viewable size diagonal Edit
The DELL U2417H has a viewable size diagonal of 604.7mmmm, but the DELL U2415 is a 611mmmm viewable size diagonal PC monitor (6.3mm larger).
10% smaller viewable height Edit
The DELL U2417H is a 296.46mmmm viewable height PC monitor. That's 27.54mm smaller than the DELL U2415 (296.46mmmm).
0.7cm smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2417H has a display diagonal of 60.4cmcm, whereas the DELL E2016H is a 49.4cm display diagonal PC monitor (11cm smaller) and the DELL U2415 is a 61.1cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.7cm bigger).
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The DELL U2417H has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² cd/m², whereas the DELL E2016H is a 250 cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (0 cd/m² brighter) and the DELL U2415 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
Slower response time Edit
The DELL U2417H is an 8msms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the DELL E2016H (8msms) and 2ms slower than the DELL U2415 (8msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less DisplayPort Edit
The DELL U2417H is a one DisplayPort PC monitor (as does the DELL E2016H), whereas the DELL U2415 only has two DisplayPorts.
Only two USB 3.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 3.0 ports on the DELL U2417H is two, but the DELL U2415 only has six USB 3.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 3.0 ports on the DELL E2016H. It is possible that it does not have any USB 3.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Only four USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the DELL U2417H is four, but the DELL U2415 only has six USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the DELL E2016H. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

55W higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL U2417H has a maximum power consumption of 74WW, whereas the DELL E2016H is a 19W maximum power consumption PC monitor (55W lower) and the DELL U2415 is a 75WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (1W higher).
Three months older
The DELL U2417H is older than the DELL E2016H by three months.

Awards

No awards found 1 Award
pcmagazine.ru: 5 Star
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Date Released

7 months Ago 27 months Ago 9 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 18.36
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.40
Total running cost $ 19.76
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.13T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.13 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
3
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data No data

Display

Screen Size
19.5" 24.1"
BEST
23.8"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 2000000:1
 2000000:1
BEST
 2000000:1
BEST
Display Type
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
Graphics Resolution
 1600 x 900
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 900
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 1600 x 900
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Backlight Type
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
 1080i
 576i
 576p
 480i
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
 1080i
 576i
 576p
 480i
BEST
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
 1080i
 576i
 576p
 480i
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
BEST
 Full HD
BEST
Digital Vertical Frequency
56 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 76
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83
Viewable Size Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 611mm
BEST
604.7mm
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 324mm
BEST
296.46mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 518.4mm 527.04mm
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 76
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83
Pixel Pitch
0.248 x 0.248 0.27 x 0.27 0.2745 x 0.2745
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
BEST
16.77M
BEST
Vertical Viewing Angle
160° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
170° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
49.4cm 61.1cm
BEST
60.4cm
Display Technology
 TN
 TN
 TN
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms
BEST
6ms 8ms
Color Gamut
86% 91% 96%
BEST
SmartResponse
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 6ms
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:10
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
 16:9
 16:10
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPort
1 2
BEST
1
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 6
BEST
2
HDMI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 2
Mini DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 6
BEST
4
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Silver
 Black/Silver
 Black
 Silver
 Black/Silver
 Black
 Silver
 Black/Silver
Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 180
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 115mm 90mm
BEST
Tilt Angle
-6 - 22 Unknown - Click to provide data -5 - 21
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
OSD Language
8 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Input Current
0.8A 1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data
Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.6A
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.3W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Typical Power Consumption
15W
BEST
23W 16W
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W
BEST
0.5W 0.5W
Maximum Power Consumption
19W
BEST
75W 74W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Range
0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Altitude
0 - 12191 0 - 5000 0 - 5000
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192 0 - 12192
Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 90 5 - 90 5 - 90
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 10 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 -20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 0 - 40 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
4.1kg
BEST
8.4kg 8.1kg
Weight With Stand
2.9kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 6kg
Height With Stand
368.9mm
BEST
517.9mm 505.2mm
Depth With Stand
167mm
BEST
205mm 201mm
Width With Stand
471.5mm
BEST
532.2mm 539.1mm
Weight
2.2kg
BEST
4.3kg 3.6kg
Height
275.4mm 350.6mm 321.1mm
Depth
51.5mm 45.7mm 45.6mm
Width
471.5mm 532.2mm 539.1mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
Feedback