AOC C3583FQ vs Asus PG278Q

(3)
(194)
AOC C3583FQ
Asus PG278Q

Top Prices

eBay
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Amazon US
Out of stock

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
8" bigger screen size Edit
The AOC C3583FQ has a screen size of 35"", whereas the Asus PG278Q is only a 27"" PC monitor (8" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

18° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The AOC C3583FQ is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° wider than the Asus PG278Q (160°°).
8° wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The AOC C3583FQ has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°°, whereas the Asus PG278Q is only a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
20.51cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The AOC C3583FQ has a display diagonal of 88.98cmcm, whereas the Asus PG278Q is only a 68.47cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (20.51cm smaller).
One more DisplayPort Edit
The AOC C3583FQ is a two DisplayPort PC monitor, whereas the Asus PG278Q only has one DisplayPort.
User reviews are moderately better
The AOC C3583FQ has an average user review score of 80%, whereas the Asus PG278Q has an average rating of 76% (based on 125 reviews).
5 Reasons For
Brighter display brightness Edit
The Asus PG278Q has a display brightness of 350 cd/m² cd/m², but the AOC C3583FQ is only a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
3x faster response time Edit
The Asus PG278Q is a 1msms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms faster than the AOC C3583FQ (1msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

$107 cheaper
The Asus PG278Q costs $550.99, whereas the AOC C3583FQ is $658.47.
Available from 3 shops
The more stores stock this PC monitor, the greater competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
Expert reviews are hugely better
The Asus PG278Q has an average expert review score of 91% based on 69 reviews, but the AOC C3583FQ has an average rating of 70% (based on 1 review).

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The AOC C3583FQ has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² cd/m², whereas the Asus PG278Q is a 350 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
75% slower response time Edit
The AOC C3583FQ is a 4msms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the Asus PG278Q (1msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

$107 more expensive
The AOC C3583FQ is more expensive than the Asus PG278Q by $107.48.
Fewer sellers
Only 8 stores sells the AOC C3583FQ, but 11 sellers sell the Asus PG278Q. Read more
The smaller the number of stores that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst stores to keep prices low.
Significantly Lower expert review Score
The average expert rating of the AOC C3583FQ is only 70%, whereas the average expert rating of the Asus PG278Q is 91% (based on 69 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
8" smaller screen size Edit
The Asus PG278Q has a screen size of 27"", but the AOC C3583FQ is a 35"" PC monitor (8" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Asus PG278Q is a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° narrower than the AOC C3583FQ (160°°).
8° narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Asus PG278Q has a horizontal viewing angle of 170°°, but the AOC C3583FQ is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° wider).
A lot smaller display diagonal Edit
The Asus PG278Q has a display diagonal of 68.47cmcm, but the AOC C3583FQ is an 88.98cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (20.51cm bigger).
One less DisplayPort Edit
The number of DisplayPorts on the Asus PG278Q is one, but the AOC C3583FQ only has two DisplayPorts.
Four months older
The Asus PG278Q is older than the AOC C3583FQ by four months.
Moderately Lower user review Score
The Asus PG278Q only has an average user rating of 76%, but the AOC C3583FQ has an average user rating of 80% (based on 2 reviews).

Awards

No awards found 34 Awards
01net.com: 5 Star
3dnews.ru: Editor's Choice
allround-pc.com: Recommended Product
Bjorn3d.com: Golden Bear Award
chip.com.my: Outstanding
Digital Versus: 5 Star
elektroniktest.dk: Gold
gamestar.de: Platinum
guru3d.com: Top Pick
hardware.info: Gold Award
hothardware.com: Editor's Choice
hwa.com.tr: High Performance
hwp.com.tr: Editor's Choice
itwriter.ru: Recommended
ixbt.com: Original Design
kitguru.net: Must Have
legitreviews.com: Recommended
Les Numeriques.com: 5 Star
nordichardware.se: Recommended
overclock3d.net: Performance
overclockersclub.com: Editor's Choice
PC Mag: Editor's Choice
pcauthority.com.au: Hot Award
pcgameware.co.uk: Gold
pcper.com: Gold
prad.de: Very Good
profesionalreview.com: Platinum
techgage.com: Editor's Choice
techno-labs.com: Editor's Choice
tek.no: Recommended
teknokulis.com: Gold
tweaktown.com: Editor's Choice
vido.com.ua: Recommended
xtremehardware.com: Gold

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

10 months Ago 14 months Ago

Display

Screen Size
35"
BEST
27"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 50000000:1
BEST
 50000000:1
Display Type
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
BEST
Graphics Resolution
 2560 x 1080
 2560 x 1440
 2560 x 1080
 2560 x 1440
BEST
3D Technology
 NVIDIA 3D Vision
 NVIDIA 3D Vision
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 144
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 89 - 222
Viewable Height
345.87mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
819.84mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
Pixel Pitch
0.32025 x 0.32025 0.233 x 0.233
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
160°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
170°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 2000:1
BEST
 2000:1
Display Diagonal
88.98cm
BEST
68.47cm
Display Technology
 MVA
 MVA
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
4ms 1ms
BEST
Screen Shape
 Curved
 Curved
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 16:9
 21:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPort
2
BEST
1
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
HDMI Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
5W Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

NVIDIA 3D Vision
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
NVIDIA 3D Vision 2
Unknown - Click to provide data 1

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 120mm
Tilt Angle
-3 - 15 -5 - 20
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -60 - 60

Power

Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W 0.5W
Typical Power Consumption
60W Unknown - Click to provide data
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 38.7W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 10.5kg
Packaging Height
280mm
BEST
456mm
Packaging Depth
610mm 300mm
BEST
Packaging Width
980mm 756mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 7kg
Height With Stand
458mm
BEST
554.5mm
Depth With Stand
213.6mm
BEST
237.9mm
Width With Stand
844.6mm 619.8mm
BEST
Weight
11.6kg Unknown - Click to provide data

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
Feedback