Asus MX299 vs HP Z Display Z24

(148)
Asus MX299
HP Z Display Z24

Top Prices

Newegg UK
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
eBay
Standard delivery: $18.03
In stock, only 2 left!

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The Asus MX299 has a screen size of 29"", but the HP Z Display Z24 is only a 24"" PC monitor (5" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Bigger display diagonal Edit
The Asus MX299 has a display diagonal of 73.03cmcm, but the HP Z Display Z24 is only a 60.96cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (12.07cm smaller).
Faster response time Edit
The Asus MX299 is a 5msms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms faster than the HP Z Display Z24 (8msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

$42 cheaper
The Asus MX299 costs $297.99, whereas the HP Z Display Z24 is $340.00.
Available from 2 shops
The more retailers stock this PC monitor, the greater competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.
3 Reasons For
18% lighter Edit
The HP Z Display Z24 has a weight of 4.7kgg, however the Asus MX299 is a 5.5kgg weight PC monitor (0.8g heavier).
Shorter Edit
The HP Z Display Z24 is a 365mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 26mm shorter than the Asus MX299 (365mmmm).
26% narrower Edit
The HP Z Display Z24 is a 559.4mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 140.8mm narrower than the Asus MX299 (559.4mmmm).

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
Heavier Edit
The Asus MX299 is a 5.5kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.8g heavier than the HP Z Display Z24 (4.7kgg).
Marginally taller Edit
The Asus MX299 has a height of 391mmmm, however the HP Z Display Z24 is a 365mmmm tall PC monitor (26mm shorter).
21% wider Edit
The Asus MX299 has a width of 700.2mmmm, however the HP Z Display Z24 is a 559.4mmmm wide PC monitor (140.8mm narrower).
One month older
The Asus MX299 is older than the HP Z Display Z24 by one month.
5 Reasons Against
21% smaller screen size Edit
The HP Z Display Z24 is a 24"" PC monitor. That's 5" smaller than the Asus MX299 (24""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

20% smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP Z Display Z24 is a 60.96cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 12.07cm smaller than the Asus MX299 (60.96cmcm).
3ms slower response time Edit
The HP Z Display Z24 has a response time of 8msms, but the Asus MX299 is a 5msms response time PC monitor (3ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

More expensive by $42
The HP Z Display Z24 is $42.01 more expensive than the Asus MX299.
Less retailers
The HP Z Display Z24 is only stocked by 8 retailers, whereas the Asus MX299 is stocked by 10 stores. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.

Awards

5 Awards
altomdata.dk: Recommended
compress.ru: Recommended
macworld.co.uk: Editor's Choice
teknokulis.com: Gold
ua.gecid.com: Original Design
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

42 months Ago 41 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data

Display

Screen Size
29"
BEST
24"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
BEST
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
Graphics Resolution
 2560 x 1080
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
BEST
 2560 x 1080
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 2160p
 1600p
 1080p
 720p
 2160p
 1600p
 1080p
 720p
BEST
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
Digital Vertical Frequency
50 - 61 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 296.46mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 527.04mm
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 61 50 - 76
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 83 24 - 94
Pixel Pitch
0.2628 x 0.2628 0.27 x 0.27
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
73.03cm
BEST
60.96cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms
BEST
8ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 99.8%
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 16:10
 21:9
 16:10
BEST
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
Unknown - Click to provide data 185

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 1
USB Version
 3.1
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 3.0
 3.1
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 3.0
DisplayPort
1 1
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 5
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 5
HDMI Port
1 1
DVI-D Port
1 1
Mini DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 4
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
6W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 120mm
Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 -5 - 30
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data 10

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
31.7W
BEST
36W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 36kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 75W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192
Relative Humidity Storage Range
10 - 80 5 - 95
Relative Humidity Operating Range
20 - 80 20 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
Safety Certification
 RoHS
 WEEE
 RoHS
 WEEE
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8.1kg
BEST
9.1kg
Packaging Height
506mm 445mm
BEST
Packaging Depth
159mm
BEST
299mm
Packaging Width
814mm 655mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
5.5kg
BEST
7kg
Height With Stand
391mm
BEST
525mm
Depth With Stand
215.1mm
BEST
237.9mm
Width With Stand
700.2mm 559.4mm
BEST
Weight
5.5kg 4.7kg
BEST
Height
391mm 365mm
BEST
Depth
215.1mm
BEST
64.5mm
Width
700.2mm 559.4mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 HDMI
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
Feedback