HP DreamColor Z24 vs HP EliteDisplay E242 vs HP Z24i vs HP ZR2440

(20)
(9)
HP DreamColor Z24
HP EliteDisplay E242
HP Z24i
HP ZR2440

Top Prices

No prices found
eBay
Standard delivery: $20.06
In stock (12 available)
B&H Photo
In stock
Antonline
Delivery unknown
In stock (200 available)
Adorama
Out of stock
Adorama
Out of stock

Reasons For

8 Reasons For
Bigger viewable height Edit
The HP DreamColor Z24 is a 325.6mmmm viewable height PC monitor. That's 1.6mm bigger than the HP EliteDisplay E242 ().
1.6mm bigger viewable width Edit
The HP DreamColor Z24 has a viewable width of 520mmmm, but the HP EliteDisplay E242 is only a 518.4mmmm viewable width PC monitor (1.6mm smaller).
A bit bigger display diagonal Edit
The HP DreamColor Z24 has a display diagonal of 61cmcm (as does the HP ZR2440), whereas the HP EliteDisplay E242 and the HP Z24i are both only 60.96cmcm display diagonal PC monitors (0.039999999999999cm smaller).
100 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The HP DreamColor Z24 has a display brightness of 350 cd/m² cd/m² (as does the HP ZR2440), whereas the HP EliteDisplay E242 is only a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (100 cd/m² dimmer) and the HP Z24i is only a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
34% faster response time Edit
The HP DreamColor Z24 is a 6msms response time PC monitor, and so does the HP ZR2440. That's 1ms faster than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (6msms) and 2ms faster than the HP Z24i (6msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more DisplayPort Edit
The HP DreamColor Z24 is a two DisplayPort PC monitor, whereas the HP ZR2440 only has one DisplayPort.
12.4mm shorter Edit
HP DreamColor Z24 is 365mmmm tall (as does the HP Z24i), but the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 377.4mmmm tall PC monitor (12.4mm taller) and the HP ZR2440 is a 368mmmm tall PC monitor (3mm taller).
Moderately narrower Edit
HP DreamColor Z24 is 559.4mmmm wide (as does the HP Z24i), but the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 562.2mmmm wide PC monitor (2.8000000000001mm wider) and the HP ZR2440 is a 562mmmm wide PC monitor (2.6mm wider).
8 Reasons For
15.77M more display colour count Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 16.77MM display colours PC monitor (as does the HP ZR2440), whereas the HP DreamColor Z24 is only a 1,070MM display colours PC monitor (15.77M less).
50mm higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a maximum height adjustment of 150mmmm, but the HP DreamColor Z24 and the HP Z24i are both only 120mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitors (30mm lower) and the HP ZR2440 is only a 100mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (50mm lower).
56% lower maximum power consumption Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 38WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 21W lower than the HP ZR2440 (59WW).
3.4g lighter Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a weight of 4.2kgg, however the HP DreamColor Z24 is a 7kgg weight PC monitor (2.8g heavier), the HP Z24i is a 4.7kgg weight PC monitor (0.5g heavier) and the HP ZR2440 is a 7.6kgg weight PC monitor (3.4g heavier).
16.5mm shallower Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a depth of 50mmmm, however the HP DreamColor Z24 is a 66.5mmmm deep PC monitor (16.5mm deeper), the HP Z24i is a 64.5mmmm deep PC monitor (14.5mm deeper) and the HP ZR2440 is a 61mmmm deep PC monitor (11mm deeper).
Cheaper by $42
The HP EliteDisplay E242 costs $42.13 less than the HP Z24i.
7 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
36% cheaper to run
Over five years the HP EliteDisplay E242 only costs $39.11 to run but the HP ZR2440 costs $61.17 to run (56% more). Read more
4 Reasons For
Five USB 2.0 ports Edit
The HP Z24i is a five USB 2.0 port PC monitor, whereas the HP DreamColor Z24 only has two USB 2.0 ports, the HP EliteDisplay E242 only has three USB 2.0 ports and the HP ZR2440 only has four USB 2.0 ports. Read more

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Having a number of USB 2.0 ports on your monitor is particularly useful for laptops where you frequently disconnect the laptop from the monitor. Just one USB connection from your laptop to your monitor will immediately connect all your other USB devices that are attached to the monitor.

Three more USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the HP Z24i is five, but the HP EliteDisplay E242 only has two USB Type-A downstream ports and the HP ZR2440 only has four USB Type-A downstream ports.
4% shorter Edit
HP Z24i is 365mmmm tall, and so does the HP DreamColor Z24. That's 12.4mm shorter than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (368mmmm) and 3mm shorter than the HP ZR2440 (368mmmm).
Narrower Edit
HP Z24i is 559.4mmmm wide, and so does the HP DreamColor Z24. That's 2.8000000000001mm narrower than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (562mmmm) and 2.6mm narrower than the HP ZR2440 (562mmmm).
4 Reasons For
15.77M more display colour count Edit
HP ZR2440 is 16.77MM display colours (as does the HP EliteDisplay E242), but the HP DreamColor Z24 is only a 1,070MM display colours PC monitor (15.77M less).
1% bigger display diagonal Edit
The HP ZR2440 is a 61cmcm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the HP DreamColor Z24. That's 0.039999999999999cm bigger than the HP EliteDisplay E242 and the HP Z24i (61cmcm).
Brighter display brightness Edit
The HP ZR2440 is a 350 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the HP DreamColor Z24. That's 100 cd/m² brighter than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (350 cd/m² cd/m²) and 50 cd/m² brighter than the HP Z24i (350 cd/m² cd/m²).
2ms faster response time Edit
The HP ZR2440 has a response time of 6msms (as does the HP DreamColor Z24), however the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 7msms response time PC monitor (1ms slower) and the HP Z24i is an 8msms response time PC monitor (2ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Reasons Against

8 Reasons Against
15.77M less display colour count Edit
HP DreamColor Z24 is only 1,070MM display colours. That's 15.77M less than the HP EliteDisplay E242 and the HP ZR2440 (16.77MM).
Three less USB 2.0 ports Edit
The HP DreamColor Z24 is a two USB 2.0 port PC monitor, whereas the HP EliteDisplay E242 only has three USB 2.0 ports, the HP Z24i only has five USB 2.0 ports and the HP ZR2440 only has four USB 2.0 ports. Read more

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Having a number of USB 2.0 ports on your monitor is particularly useful for laptops where you frequently disconnect the laptop from the monitor. Just one USB connection from your laptop to your monitor will immediately connect all your other USB devices that are attached to the monitor.

Only two USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the HP DreamColor Z24 is two, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E242, but the HP Z24i only has five USB Type-A downstream ports and the HP ZR2440 only has four USB Type-A downstream ports.
25% lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The HP DreamColor Z24 is a 120mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor, and so does the HP Z24i. That's 30mm lower than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (100mmmm) and 20mm higher than the HP ZR2440 (100mmmm).
40% heavier Edit
The HP DreamColor Z24 is a 7kgg weight PC monitor. That's 2.8g heavier than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (7.6kgg), 2.3g heavier than the HP Z24i (7.6kgg) and 0.6g lighter than the HP ZR2440 (7.6kgg).
16.5mm deeper Edit
The HP DreamColor Z24 is a 66.5mmmm deep PC monitor. That's 16.5mm deeper than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (61mmmm), 2mm deeper than the HP Z24i (61mmmm) and 5.5mm deeper than the HP ZR2440 (61mmmm).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Over one year older
The HP DreamColor Z24 is older than the HP EliteDisplay E242 by 18 months and older than the HP Z24i by 15 months.
10 Reasons Against
A little smaller viewable height Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a viewable height of 324mmmm, however the HP DreamColor Z24 is a 325.6mmmm viewable height PC monitor (1.6mm bigger).
Smaller viewable width Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 518.4mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 1.6mm smaller than the HP DreamColor Z24 ().
1% smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 60.96cmcm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the HP Z24i. That's 0.039999999999999cm smaller than the HP DreamColor Z24 and the HP ZR2440 (61cmcm).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 100 cd/m² dimmer than the HP DreamColor Z24 and the HP ZR2440 (350 cd/m² cd/m²) and 50 cd/m² dimmer than the HP Z24i (350 cd/m² cd/m²).
Slower response time Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has a response time of 7msms, but the HP DreamColor Z24 and the HP ZR2440 are both 6msms response time PC monitors (1ms faster) and the HP Z24i is an 8msms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one DisplayPort Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has one DisplayPort, and so do the HP Z24i and the HP ZR2440, however the HP DreamColor Z24 only has two DisplayPorts.
Only three USB 2.0 ports Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 has three USB 2.0 ports, however the HP Z24i only has five USB 2.0 ports and the HP ZR2440 only has four USB 2.0 ports. Read more

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Having a number of USB 2.0 ports on your monitor is particularly useful for laptops where you frequently disconnect the laptop from the monitor. Just one USB connection from your laptop to your monitor will immediately connect all your other USB devices that are attached to the monitor.

Three less USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a two USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor (as does the HP DreamColor Z24), whereas the HP Z24i only has five USB Type-A downstream ports and the HP ZR2440 only has four USB Type-A downstream ports.
Taller Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 377.4mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 12.4mm taller than the HP DreamColor Z24 and the HP Z24i (368mmmm) and 9.4mm taller than the HP ZR2440 (368mmmm).
1% wider Edit
The HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 562.2mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 2.8000000000001mm wider than the HP DreamColor Z24 and the HP Z24i (562mmmm) and 0.20000000000005mm wider than the HP ZR2440 (562mmmm).
10 Reasons Against
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP Z24i is a 60.96cmcm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the HP EliteDisplay E242. That's 0.039999999999999cm smaller than the HP DreamColor Z24 and the HP ZR2440 (61cmcm).
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP Z24i is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the HP DreamColor Z24 and the HP ZR2440 (350 cd/m² cd/m²) and 50 cd/m² brighter than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (350 cd/m² cd/m²).
25% slower response time Edit
The HP Z24i has a response time of 8msms, however the HP DreamColor Z24 and the HP ZR2440 are both 6msms response time PC monitors (2ms faster) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 7msms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one DisplayPort Edit
The HP Z24i is a one DisplayPort PC monitor, and so do the HP EliteDisplay E242 and the HP ZR2440, whereas the HP DreamColor Z24 only has two DisplayPorts.
25% lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The HP Z24i has a maximum height adjustment of 120mmmm (as does the HP DreamColor Z24), however the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 150mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (30mm higher) and the HP ZR2440 is a 100mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (20mm lower).
0.5g heavier Edit
The HP Z24i has a weight of 4.7kgg, whereas the HP DreamColor Z24 is a 7kgg weight PC monitor (2.3g heavier), the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 4.2kgg weight PC monitor (0.5g lighter) and the HP ZR2440 is a 7.6kgg weight PC monitor (2.9g heavier).
14.5mm deeper Edit
The HP Z24i is a 64.5mmmm deep PC monitor, whereas the HP DreamColor Z24 is a 66.5mmmm deep PC monitor (2mm deeper), the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 50mmmm deep PC monitor (14.5mm shallower) and the HP ZR2440 is a 61mmmm deep PC monitor (3.5mm shallower).
More expensive by $42
The HP Z24i is $42.13 more expensive than the HP EliteDisplay E242.
Fewer sellers
The HP Z24i is only stocked by 7 stores, but the HP EliteDisplay E242 is stocked by 8 sellers. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Older by three months
The HP Z24i is three months older than the HP EliteDisplay E242.
12 Reasons Against
Only one DisplayPort Edit
The HP ZR2440 is a one DisplayPort PC monitor, and so do the HP EliteDisplay E242 and the HP Z24i, whereas the HP DreamColor Z24 only has two DisplayPorts.
Only four USB 2.0 ports Edit
The HP ZR2440 is a four USB 2.0 port PC monitor, whereas the HP Z24i only has five USB 2.0 ports. Read more

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Having a number of USB 2.0 ports on your monitor is particularly useful for laptops where you frequently disconnect the laptop from the monitor. Just one USB connection from your laptop to your monitor will immediately connect all your other USB devices that are attached to the monitor.

One less USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the HP ZR2440 is four, but the HP Z24i only has five USB Type-A downstream ports.
50mm lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The HP ZR2440 has a maximum height adjustment of 100mmmm, however the HP DreamColor Z24 and the HP Z24i are both 120mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitors (20mm higher) and the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 150mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (50mm higher).
36% higher maximum power consumption Edit
The HP ZR2440 is a 59WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 21W higher than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (59WW).
3.4g heavier Edit
The HP ZR2440 has a weight of 7.6kgg, whereas the HP DreamColor Z24 is a 7kgg weight PC monitor (0.6g lighter), the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 4.2kgg weight PC monitor (3.4g lighter) and the HP Z24i is a 4.7kgg weight PC monitor (2.9g lighter).
Taller Edit
HP ZR2440 is 368mmmm tall. That's 3mm taller than the HP DreamColor Z24 and the HP Z24i (368mmmm) and 9.4mm shorter than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (368mmmm).
11mm deeper Edit
The HP ZR2440 is a 61mmmm deep PC monitor, whereas the HP DreamColor Z24 is a 66.5mmmm deep PC monitor (5.5mm deeper), the HP EliteDisplay E242 is a 50mmmm deep PC monitor (11mm shallower) and the HP Z24i is a 64.5mmmm deep PC monitor (3.5mm deeper).
1% wider Edit
HP ZR2440 is 562mmmm wide. That's 2.6mm wider than the HP DreamColor Z24 and the HP Z24i (562mmmm) and 0.20000000000005mm narrower than the HP EliteDisplay E242 (562mmmm).
Fewer sellers
The HP ZR2440 is only stocked by 1 store, but the HP EliteDisplay E242 is stocked by 8 stores and the HP Z24i is stocked by 7 stores. Read more
The fewer the number of sellers that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
Older by over one year
The HP ZR2440 is four months older than the HP DreamColor Z24, 22 months older than the HP EliteDisplay E242 and 19 months older than the HP Z24i.
$22.06 more expensive to run over five years
The running costs of the HP ZR2440 are $61.17 which is $22.06 more than the HP EliteDisplay E242 over five years. Show assumptions.

Awards

No awards found No awards found 1 Award
cnews.cz: Smart Buy
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found No reviews found No reviews found

Date Released

33 months Ago 15 months Ago 17 months Ago 37 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 36.78
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 39.11
Purchase price $ 130.00
Total cost of ownership $ 169.11
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 58.84
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 61.17

Energy Efficiency Class

No data
No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.25T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.25 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data
0.4T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.4 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
10
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
24" 24" 24" 24"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 5000000:1
BEST
 5000000:1
BEST
 5000000:1
BEST
 5000000:1
Display Type
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
BEST
 LCD
 LED
BEST
 LCD
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 960
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 900
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 720 x 400
 1366 х 768
 1280 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768
 720 x 480
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 960
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 900
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 720 x 400
 1366 х 768
 1280 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768
 720 x 480
BEST
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 960
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 900
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 720 x 400
 1366 х 768
 1280 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768
 720 x 480
BEST
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 960
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 900
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 720 x 400
 1366 х 768
 1280 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768
 720 x 480
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
BEST
 Full HD
 Full HD
BEST
Viewable Height
325.6mm
BEST
324mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
520mm
BEST
518.4mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 16:10
 16:10
 16:10
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 60 50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 80 24 - 94 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.27 x 0.27 0.27 x 0.27 0.27 x 0.27 0.270 x 0.270
Display Colour Count
1,070M 16.77M
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
BEST
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
61cm
BEST
60.96cm 60.96cm 61cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
350 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
6ms
BEST
7ms 8ms 6ms
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 16:10
 16:10
 16:10
Supported Number of Colours Display
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPort
2
BEST
1 1 1
USB 2.0 Port
2 3 5
BEST
4
USB 3.0 Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI-D Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
2 2 5
BEST
4
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90 0 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Height Adjustment
120mm 150mm
BEST
120mm 100mm
Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 -5 - 25 -5 - 30 -5 - 35
Swivel Angle Range
-45 - 45 -45 - 45 -45 - 45 -45 - 45

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.24W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
58W 30W
BEST
36W 48W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W 0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 30kWh Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 38W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 59W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 95 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 35 Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 6.2kg
BEST
7kg 7.6kg
Height With Stand
525mm 519mm 525mm 429mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
238mm 189mm
BEST
237.9mm 235mm
Width With Stand
559.4mm
BEST
562.2mm 559.4mm
BEST
562mm
Weight
7kg 4.2kg
BEST
4.7kg 7.6kg
Height
365mm
BEST
377.4mm 365mm
BEST
368mm
Depth
66.5mm 50mm
BEST
64.5mm 61mm
Width
559.4mm
BEST
562.2mm 559.4mm
BEST
562mm
Feedback