DELL E2414H vs DELL U2415 vs DELL UltraSharp 24

(34)
(169)
(169)
DELL E2414H
DELL U2415
DELL UltraSharp 24

Top Prices

eBay
Newegg UK
MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock
B&H Photo
In stock
eBay
In stock, only 3 left!
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Amazon US
Out of stock
eBay
In stock, only 4 left!
B&H Photo
In stock
Overstock

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
12.96mm bigger viewable width Edit
The DELL E2414H has a viewable width of 531.36mmmm, however the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both only 518.4mmmm viewable width PC monitors (12.96mm smaller).
60% faster response time Edit
The DELL E2414H is a 5msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the DELL U2415 (8msms) and 3ms faster than the DELL UltraSharp 24 (8msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

2x lower maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL E2414H has a maximum power consumption of 30WW, but the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 75WW maximum power consumption PC monitors (45W higher).
44% lighter Edit
The DELL E2414H is a 3kgg weight PC monitor. That's 1.3g lighter than the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 (4.3kgg).
13.1mm shorter Edit
The DELL E2414H has a height of 337.5mmmm, however the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 350.6mmmm tall PC monitors (13.1mm taller).
$79 cheaper
The DELL E2414H costs $99.99, whereas the DELL U2415 is $239.00 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 is $179.43.
$3.68 cheaper to run
The DELL E2414H only costs $26.85 to run over five years whereas the DELL UltraSharp 24 costs $30.53 to run (14% more). Read more
14 Reasons For
1% bigger screen size Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 24.1"" PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 0.1" bigger than the DELL E2414H (24.1""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

25.11mm bigger viewable height Edit
The DELL U2415 has a viewable height of 324mmmm (as does the DELL UltraSharp 24), but the DELL E2414H is only a 298.89mmmm viewable height PC monitor (25.11mm smaller).
Wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The DELL U2415 has a vertical viewing angle of 178°° (as does the DELL UltraSharp 24), but the DELL E2414H is only a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
5% wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 8° wider than the DELL E2414H (178°°).
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 61.1cmcm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 0.13cm bigger than the DELL E2414H (61.1cmcm).
Brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the DELL E2414H (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
8% larger color gamut Edit
The DELL U2415 has a color gamut of 91%%, but the DELL E2414H is only an 83%% color gamut PC monitor (8% smaller).
Two DisplayPorts Edit
The number of DisplayPorts on the DELL U2415 is two, but the DELL UltraSharp 24 only has one DisplayPort. Read more

We do not know the number of DisplayPorts on the DELL E2414H. It is possible that it does not have any DisplayPorts.

One more USB 3.0 port Edit
The DELL U2415 has six USB 3.0 ports, however the DELL UltraSharp 24 only has five USB 3.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 3.0 ports on the DELL E2414H. It is possible that it does not have any USB 3.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

One more USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The DELL U2415 has six USB Type-A downstream ports, however the DELL UltraSharp 24 only has five USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the DELL E2414H. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

Marginally shallower Edit
DELL U2415 is 45.7mmmm deep (as does the DELL UltraSharp 24), but the DELL E2414H is a 46.5mmmm deep PC monitor (0.8mm deeper).
Narrower Edit
The DELL U2415 has a width of 532.2mmmm, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 37.8mm narrower than the DELL E2414H (532.2mmmm).
8 shops are selling it
The more shops stock the product, the greater competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Better user reviews
The average user review score of the DELL U2415 is 91%, but the average rating of the DELL E2414H is 82% (based on 34 reviews).
9 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 24.1"" PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 0.1" bigger than the DELL E2414H (24.1""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Moderately bigger viewable height Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a viewable height of 324mmmm (as does the DELL U2415), whereas the DELL E2414H is only a 298.89mmmm viewable height PC monitor (25.11mm smaller).
18° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a vertical viewing angle of 178°° (as does the DELL U2415), whereas the DELL E2414H is only a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
Wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 8° wider than the DELL E2414H (178°°).
1% bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 61.1cmcm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 0.13cm bigger than the DELL E2414H (61.1cmcm).
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the DELL E2414H (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
0.8mm shallower Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 45.7mmmm deep PC monitor (as does the DELL U2415), whereas the DELL E2414H is a 46.5mmmm deep PC monitor (0.8mm deeper).
8% narrower Edit
DELL UltraSharp 24 is 532.2mmmm wide, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 37.8mm narrower than the DELL E2414H (532.2mmmm).
Better user reviews
Based on 166 user reviews, the average review score of the DELL UltraSharp 24 is 91%, whereas the average rating of the DELL E2414H is 82% (based on 34 reviews).

Reasons Against

12 Reasons Against
0.1" smaller screen size Edit
The DELL E2414H has a screen size of 24"", but the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 24.1"" PC monitors (0.1" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller viewable height Edit
The DELL E2414H is a 298.89mmmm viewable height PC monitor. That's 25.11mm smaller than the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 (324mmmm).
Narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The DELL E2414H is a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° narrower than the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 (178°°).
8° narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The DELL E2414H has a horizontal viewing angle of 170°°, but the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitors (8° wider).
Slightly smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL E2414H has a display diagonal of 60.97cmcm, but the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 61.1cmcm display diagonal PC monitors (0.13cm bigger).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The DELL E2414H has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² cd/m², but the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (50 cd/m² brighter).
Smaller color gamut Edit
The DELL E2414H is an 83%% color gamut PC monitor. That's 8% smaller than the DELL U2415 ().
2% deeper Edit
DELL E2414H is 46.5mmmm deep. That's 0.8mm deeper than the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 (45.7mmmm).
A little wider Edit
The DELL E2414H has a width of 570mmmm, however the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 532.2mmmm wide PC monitors (37.8mm narrower).
Not as many stockists
Only 4 sellers sells the DELL E2414H, however 12 sellers sell the DELL U2415 and 11 sellers sell the DELL UltraSharp 24. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Over one year older
The DELL E2414H is older than the DELL U2415 by 15 months and older than the DELL UltraSharp 24 by 15 months.
Lower user review Score
The DELL E2414H has an average user rating of 82%, but the DELL U2415 has an average user rating of 91% (based on 166 reviews) and the DELL UltraSharp 24 has an average user rating of 91% (based on 166 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
3% smaller viewable width Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 518.4mmmm viewable width PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 12.96mm smaller than the DELL E2414H (518.4mmmm).
1ms slower response time Edit
The DELL U2415 has a response time of 6msms, whereas the DELL E2414H is a 5msms response time PC monitor (1ms faster) and the DELL UltraSharp 24 is an 8msms response time PC monitor (2ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less DVI port Edit
The DELL U2415 is a DVI port PC monitor, whereas the DELL E2414H only has one DVI port. Read more

We do not know the number of DVI ports on the DELL UltraSharp 24. It is possible that it does not have any DVI ports.

Higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 75WW maximum power consumption PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 45W higher than the DELL E2414H (75WW).
A lot heavier Edit
The DELL U2415 has a weight of 4.3kgg (as does the DELL UltraSharp 24), but the DELL E2414H is a 3kgg weight PC monitor (1.3g lighter).
4% taller Edit
The DELL U2415 has a height of 350.6mmmm, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 13.1mm taller than the DELL E2414H (350.6mmmm).
More expensive by $139
The DELL U2415 is $139.01 more expensive than the DELL E2414H and $59.57 more expensive than the DELL UltraSharp 24.
11 Reasons Against
Smaller viewable width Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 518.4mmmm viewable width PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 12.96mm smaller than the DELL E2414H (518.4mmmm).
3ms slower response time Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a response time of 8msms, however the DELL E2414H is a 5msms response time PC monitor (3ms faster) and the DELL U2415 is a 6msms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one DisplayPort Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a one DisplayPort PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2415 only has two DisplayPorts. Read more

We do not know the number of DisplayPorts on the DELL E2414H. It is possible that it does not have any DisplayPorts.

One less USB 3.0 port Edit
The number of USB 3.0 ports on the DELL UltraSharp 24 is five, but the DELL U2415 only has six USB 3.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 3.0 ports on the DELL E2414H. It is possible that it does not have any USB 3.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

One less USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the DELL UltraSharp 24 is five, but the DELL U2415 only has six USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the DELL E2414H. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

60% higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 75WW maximum power consumption PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 45W higher than the DELL E2414H (75WW).
1.3g heavier Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a weight of 4.3kgg (as does the DELL U2415), whereas the DELL E2414H is a 3kgg weight PC monitor (1.3g lighter).
Taller Edit
DELL UltraSharp 24 is 350.6mmmm tall, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 13.1mm taller than the DELL E2414H (350.6mmmm).
More expensive by $79
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is $79.44 more expensive than the DELL E2414H.
Fewer sellers
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is only stocked by 11 sellers, but the DELL U2415 is stocked by 12 shops. Read more
The fewer the number of sellers that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
$3.68 more expensive to run over five years
Over five years the running costs of the DELL UltraSharp 24 are $30.53 which is $3.68 more than the DELL E2414H. Show assumptions.

Awards

No awards found 1 Award
pcmagazine.ru: 5 Star
1 Award
pcmagazine.ru: 5 Star

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

42 months Ago 26 months Ago 27 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 24.52
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 26.85
Purchase price $ 99.99
Total cost of ownership $ 126.84
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 28.20
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 30.53
Purchase price $ 179.43
Total cost of ownership $ 209.96
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.17T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.17 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
4
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data
0.2T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
24" 24.1"
BEST
24.1"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
BEST
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
BEST
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 2000000:1
 2000000:1
BEST
 2000000:1
BEST
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
BEST
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
BEST
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Viewable Size Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 611mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
298.89mm 324mm
BEST
324mm
BEST
Viewable Width
531.36mm
BEST
518.4mm 518.4mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.27 x 0.27 0.27 x 0.27 0.27 x 0.27
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
160° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
170° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
60.97cm 61.1cm
BEST
61.1cm
BEST
Display Technology
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
5ms
BEST
6ms 8ms
Color Gamut
83% 91%
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:10
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Ultra Contrast
 Ultra Contrast
 Ultra Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
BEST
1
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 6
BEST
5
HDMI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 2
DVI-D Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Mini DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 6
BEST
5
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Silver
 Black
 Silver
 Black
 Silver
Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 115mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -21 - 5

Power

Input Current
1.5A 1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data
Current Rating
1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
20W
BEST
23W 23W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W 0.5W
Maximum Power Consumption
30W
BEST
75W 75W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 10668 0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 90 5 - 90 5 - 90
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 10 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 -20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 0 - 40 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
4.3kg
BEST
8.4kg 8.4kg
Bezel Width On Side
4,480mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
418.3g Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Height With Stand
418.3mm
BEST
517.9mm 517.9mm
Depth With Stand
164.2mm
BEST
205mm 205mm
Width With Stand
570.9mm 532.2mm
BEST
532.2mm
BEST
Weight
3kg
BEST
4.3kg 4.3kg
Height
337.5mm
BEST
350.6mm 350.6mm
Depth
46.5mm 45.7mm
BEST
45.7mm
BEST
Width
570mm 532.2mm
BEST
532.2mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort

Other Features

Quantity
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback