Eizo FlexScan EV2750 vs NEC EA275UHD vs NEC MultiSync EA274

(12)
(8)
(18)
Eizo FlexScan EV2750
NEC EA275UHD
NEC MultiSync EA274

Top Prices

eBay
B&H Photo
Delivery unknown
In stock
Adorama
Delivery unknown
In stock
Newegg UK
B&H Photo
In stock
eBay
Standard delivery: $54.99
In stock, only 6 left!
Factory Outlet Store
In stock
Adorama
Out of stock

Reasons For

9 Reasons For
More display colour count Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has a display colour count of 16.77MM, and so does the NEC MultiSync EA274. That's 15.77M more than the NEC EA275UHD (16.77MM).
0.030000000000001cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has a display diagonal of 68.5cmcm, but the NEC EA275UHD and the NEC MultiSync EA274 are both only 68.47cmcm display diagonal PC monitors (0.030000000000001cm smaller).
1ms faster response time Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 5msms response time PC monitor, and so does the NEC EA275UHD. That's 1ms faster than the NEC MultiSync EA274 (6msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

25mm higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 155mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 25mm higher than the NEC EA275UHD and the NEC MultiSync EA274 (130mmmm).
Lighter Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 5.1kgg weight PC monitor. That's 4g lighter than the NEC EA275UHD (5.8kgg) and 0.7g lighter than the NEC MultiSync EA274 (5.8kgg).
$193.70 cheaper to run
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is $193.70 cheaper to run than the NEC MultiSync EA274 over five years. Read more
One more awards
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has 3 awards, however the NEC EA275UHD has 2 awards.
Expert reviews are better
Based on 10 expert reviews, the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has an average review score of 90%, but the NEC EA275UHD has an average rating of 80% (based on 5 reviews) and the NEC MultiSync EA274 has an average rating of 83% (based on 1 review).
User reviews are better
Based on 2 user reviews, the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has an average review score of 100%, but the NEC EA275UHD has an average rating of 73% (based on 3 reviews) and the NEC MultiSync EA274 has an average rating of 93% (based on 17 reviews).
9 Reasons For
20% faster response time Edit
The NEC EA275UHD is a 5msms response time PC monitor, and so does the Eizo FlexScan EV2750. That's 1ms faster than the NEC MultiSync EA274 (6msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Four USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the NEC EA275UHD is four, and so does the NEC MultiSync EA274, but the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 only has two USB Type-A downstream ports.
36% lower power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The NEC EA275UHD is a 0.37WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor. That's 0.13W lower than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 and the NEC MultiSync EA274 (0.5WW).
A lot lower annual energy consumption Edit
The NEC EA275UHD has an annual energy consumption of 51kWhkWh, however the NEC MultiSync EA274 is a 68kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (17kWh higher).
A lot lower maximum power consumption Edit
The NEC EA275UHD has a maximum power consumption of 49WW, whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 67WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (18W higher) and the NEC MultiSync EA274 is a 57WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (8W higher).
Lower power consumption in economy mode Edit
The NEC EA275UHD is a 28WW power consumption in economy mode PC monitor. That's 7W lower than the NEC MultiSync EA274 (35WW).
$266 cheaper
The NEC EA275UHD is $506.01 cheaper than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 and $266.01 cheaper than the NEC MultiSync EA274.
Available from 7 shops
A greater number of stores increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Superior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the NEC EA275UHD is "B", whereas the rating of the NEC MultiSync EA274 is "C".
3 Reasons For
Significantly more display colour count Edit
The NEC MultiSync EA274 is a 16.77MM display colours PC monitor (as does the Eizo FlexScan EV2750), whereas the NEC EA275UHD is only a 1,060MM display colours PC monitor (15.77M less).
Two USB 2.0 ports Edit
The NEC MultiSync EA274 has two USB 2.0 ports, however the NEC EA275UHD only has one USB 2.0 port. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 2.0 ports on the Eizo FlexScan EV2750. It is possible that it does not have any USB 2.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Having a number of USB 2.0 ports on your monitor is particularly useful for laptops where you frequently disconnect the laptop from the monitor. Just one USB connection from your laptop to your monitor will immediately connect all your other USB devices that are attached to the monitor.

Two more USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The NEC MultiSync EA274 is a four USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor (as does the NEC EA275UHD), whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 only has two USB Type-A downstream ports.

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
Only two USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has two USB Type-A downstream ports, however the NEC MultiSync EA274 only has four USB Type-A downstream ports.
Higher power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 0.5WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor, and so does the NEC MultiSync EA274. That's 0.13W higher than the NEC EA275UHD (0.5WW).
18W higher maximum power consumption Edit
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has a maximum power consumption of 67WW, but the NEC EA275UHD is a 49WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (18W lower) and the NEC MultiSync EA274 is a 57WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (10W lower).
$506 more expensive
The Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is more expensive than the NEC EA275UHD by $506.01 and more expensive than the NEC MultiSync EA274 by $240.
Not as many stockists
Only 3 retailers sells the Eizo FlexScan EV2750, however 9 sellers sell the NEC EA275UHD. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
9 Reasons Against
Sixteen times less display colour count Edit
NEC EA275UHD is only 1,060MM display colours. That's 15.77M less than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 and the NEC MultiSync EA274 (16.77MM).
Marginally smaller display diagonal Edit
The NEC EA275UHD has a display diagonal of 68.47cmcm (as does the NEC MultiSync EA274), whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 68.5cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.030000000000001cm bigger).
One less USB 2.0 port Edit
The NEC EA275UHD is a one USB 2.0 port PC monitor, whereas the NEC MultiSync EA274 only has two USB 2.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 2.0 ports on the Eizo FlexScan EV2750. It is possible that it does not have any USB 2.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Having a number of USB 2.0 ports on your monitor is particularly useful for laptops where you frequently disconnect the laptop from the monitor. Just one USB connection from your laptop to your monitor will immediately connect all your other USB devices that are attached to the monitor.

20% lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The NEC EA275UHD is a 130mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor, and so does the NEC MultiSync EA274. That's 25mm lower than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 (130mmmm).
44% heavier Edit
The NEC EA275UHD is a 9.1kgg weight PC monitor. That's 4g heavier than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 (5.8kgg) and 3.3g heavier than the NEC MultiSync EA274 (5.8kgg).
Four months older
The NEC EA275UHD is older than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 by four months.
Fewer awards
Whilst the NEC EA275UHD has received 2 awards, the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 has received 3 awards.
A lot Lower expert review Score
The average expert rating of the NEC EA275UHD is 80%, whereas the average expert rating of the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is 90% (based on 10 reviews) and the NEC MultiSync EA274 is 83% (based on 1 review).
Significantly Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the NEC EA275UHD is only 73%, whereas the average user rating of the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is 100% (based on 2 reviews) and the NEC MultiSync EA274 is 93% (based on 17 reviews).
15 Reasons Against
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The NEC MultiSync EA274 is a 68.47cmcm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the NEC EA275UHD. That's 0.030000000000001cm smaller than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 (68.47cmcm).
Slower response time Edit
The NEC MultiSync EA274 has a response time of 6msms, but the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 and the NEC EA275UHD are both 5msms response time PC monitors (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The NEC MultiSync EA274 has a maximum height adjustment of 130mmmm (as does the NEC EA275UHD), but the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 155mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (25mm higher).
A lot higher power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The NEC MultiSync EA274 has a power consumption when in PowerSave mode of 0.5WW (as does the Eizo FlexScan EV2750), whereas the NEC EA275UHD is a 0.37WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (0.13W lower).
Higher annual energy consumption Edit
The NEC MultiSync EA274 is a 68kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 17kWh higher than the NEC EA275UHD (68kWhkWh).
15% higher maximum power consumption Edit
The NEC MultiSync EA274 is a 57WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 10W lower than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 (57WW) and 8W higher than the NEC EA275UHD (57WW).
13% heavier Edit
The NEC MultiSync EA274 has a weight of 5.8kgg, however the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is a 5.1kgg weight PC monitor (0.7g lighter) and the NEC EA275UHD is a 9.1kgg weight PC monitor (3.3g heavier).
7W higher power consumption in economy mode Edit
The NEC MultiSync EA274 has a power consumption in economy mode of 35WW, whereas the NEC EA275UHD is a 28WW power consumption in economy mode PC monitor (7W lower).
More expensive by $266
The NEC MultiSync EA274 is $266.01 more expensive than the NEC EA275UHD.
Less retailers
The NEC MultiSync EA274 is only stocked by 2 stores, whereas the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 is stocked by 3 shops and the NEC EA275UHD is stocked by 9 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by over two years
The NEC MultiSync EA274 is two years older than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750 and 20 months older than the NEC EA275UHD.
Higher running costs over five years by $193.70
The running costs over five years of the NEC MultiSync EA274 are $220.67 which is $193.70 more than the Eizo FlexScan EV2750. Show assumptions.
Lower energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the NEC MultiSync EA274 is "C", however the rating of the NEC EA275UHD is "B".
Expert review Rating is Worse
The NEC MultiSync EA274's average expert score is 83%, however the Eizo FlexScan EV2750's is 90% (based on 10 reviews).
User review Rating is Worse
The NEC MultiSync EA274's average user score is 93%, however the Eizo FlexScan EV2750's is 100% (based on 2 reviews).

Awards

3 Awards
hardwareluxx.de: Excellent Hardware
hardwareluxx.ru: Excellent Hardware
xtremehardware.com: Silver
2 Awards
tomshardware.co.uk: Editor Approved
tomshardware.com: Editor Approved
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

14 months Ago 18 months Ago 39 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 26.97
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 26.97
Purchase price $ 989.00
Total cost of ownership $ 1,015.97
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 57.62
Electricity cost - standby $ 163.05
Total running cost $ 220.67
Purchase price $ 749.00
Total cost of ownership $ 969.67
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

0.17T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.17 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
4
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data
1.4T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 1.4 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
37
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27" 27" 27"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 25000:1
 25000:1
 25000:1
BEST
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1600 (WQXGA)
 1280 x 960
 1152 x 870
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1920 x 1440
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 832 x 624
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1600 (WQXGA)
 1280 x 960
 1152 x 870
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1920 x 1440
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 832 x 624
BEST
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1600 (WQXGA)
 1280 x 960
 1152 x 870
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1920 x 1440
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 832 x 624
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 2160p
 2160p
BEST
 2160p
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
 4K Ultra HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
59 - 61 30 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
31 - 89 31.5 - 135 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
335.7mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
596.7mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 75 56 - 75
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 31.5 - 135 31.5 - 83
Pixel Pitch
0.233 x 0.233 0.155 x 0.155 0.233 x 0.233
Display Colour Count
16.77M
BEST
1,060M 16.77M
BEST
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.5cm
BEST
68.47cm 68.47cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
350 cd/m² 350 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms
BEST
5ms
BEST
6ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 100% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 1 1
USB Version
 3.1
 2.0/3.0
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0/3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0
 3.0
 3.1
 2.0/3.0
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0/3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0
 3.0
 3.1
 2.0/3.0
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0/3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0
 3.0
DisplayPort
1 1 1
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 2
BEST
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 3 3
HDMI Port
1 1 1
DVI-D Port
1 1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 3
USB Type-A Downstream Port
2 4
BEST
4
BEST
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
2W 2W 2W
Loudspeaker
2 2 2

Design

Coloured Feet
 White
 Black
 White
 Black
 White
 Black
Case Colour
 White
 White
 White

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
0 - 90 0 - 90 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
155mm
BEST
130mm 130mm
Tilt Angle
5 - 35 -5 - 30 5 - 30
Swivel Angle Range
0 - 344 -170 - 170 170 - 170
On Screen Display Language
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
BEST
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
OSD Language
11 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.2A Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
 B
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.5W 0.37W
BEST
0.5W
Typical Power Consumption
22W
BEST
35W 47W
Standby Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.37W
BEST
35W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 51kWh
BEST
68kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
67W 49W
BEST
57W
Input Voltage
 120
 120
 120
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 120
 220
 12
 120-220
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 120
 220
 12
 120-220
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 120
 220
 12
 120-220

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
20 - 80 20 - 80 20 - 80
Operating Temperature Range
5 - 35 5 - 35 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 MPR II
 EPEAT Gold
 RoHS
 TCO
 MPR II
 EPEAT Gold
 RoHS
 TCO
 MPR II
 EPEAT Gold
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
7.9kg
BEST
9.1kg 8.7kg
Height With Stand
545.2mm 417.9mm
BEST
417.9mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
245mm 230mm
BEST
230mm
BEST
Width With Stand
611.6mm
BEST
639.2mm 639.2mm
Weight
5.1kg
BEST
9.1kg 5.8kg
Height
359mm 230mm 377.8mm
Depth
48.5mm 417.9mm 66.5mm
Width
611.6mm 639.2mm 639.2mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI

Other Features

Power Consumption in Economy Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 28W
BEST
35W

Technical Details

Light Sensor
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
Feedback