LG 49XS2B vs LG 75UH5C

LG 49XS2B
LG 75UH5C

Top Prices

PC Rush
Delivery unknown
In stock
Walmart
Delivery unknown
In stock
Vision ComputersUSA
Delivery unknown
PC Rush
Delivery unknown
In stock
my Goods
Delivery unknown
In stock, only 3 left!

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
One more HDMI port Edit
The LG 49XS2B has two HDMI ports, however the LG 75UH5C only has one HDMI port.
Significantly lower power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The LG 49XS2B has a power consumption when in PowerSave mode of 100WW, whereas the LG 75UH5C is a 170WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (70W higher).
Vastly lighter Edit
The LG 49XS2B has a weight of 21.1kgg, however the LG 75UH5C is a 41.3kgg weight PC monitor (20.2g heavier).
54% shorter Edit
The LG 49XS2B is a 627mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 333mm shorter than the LG 75UH5C (960mmmm).
Cheaper by $2,216
The LG 49XS2B costs $2,215.84 less than the LG 75UH5C.
3 Reasons For
26" bigger screen size Edit
The LG 75UH5C has a screen size of 75"", whereas the LG 49XS2B is only a 49"" PC monitor (26" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

44% shallower Edit
The LG 75UH5C is a 58mmmm deep PC monitor. That's 25mm shallower than the LG 49XS2B (58mmmm).
Available from 1 shops
A greater number of stores increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
54% smaller screen size Edit
The LG 49XS2B is a 49"" PC monitor. That's 26" smaller than the LG 75UH5C (75""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

A lot deeper Edit
The LG 49XS2B has a depth of 83mmmm, however the LG 75UH5C is a 58mmmm deep PC monitor (25mm shallower).
Less retailers
The LG 49XS2B is only stocked by 2 retailers, whereas the LG 75UH5C is stocked by 3 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by two months
The LG 49XS2B is two months older than the LG 75UH5C.
5 Reasons Against
Only one HDMI port Edit
The LG 75UH5C is a one HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the LG 49XS2B only has two HDMI ports.
42% higher power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The LG 75UH5C is a 170WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor. That's 70W higher than the LG 49XS2B (170WW).
49% heavier Edit
The LG 75UH5C is a 41.3kgg weight PC monitor. That's 20.2g heavier than the LG 49XS2B (41.3kgg).
333mm taller Edit
LG 75UH5C is 960mmmm tall, but the LG 49XS2B is a 627mmmm tall PC monitor (333mm shorter).
$2,216 more expensive
The LG 75UH5C is more expensive than the LG 49XS2B by $2,215.84.

Date Released

14 months Ago 12 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 269.70
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 269.70
Purchase price $ 3,765.62
Total cost of ownership $ 4,035.32
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

1.7T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 1.7 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
45
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Display

Screen Size
49" 75"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 4000000:1
 4000000:1
BEST
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
Unknown - Click to provide data 500 cd/m²
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9

Ports & Interfaces

RS-232 Port
1 1
HDMI Port
2
BEST
1
DVI-D Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 1

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

Compatible Memory Card
 SD
 SD

Networking

Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
100W
BEST
170W
Typical Power Consumption
220W
BEST
240W
Maximum Power Consumption
260W Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 45 0 - 40

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
25.7kg
BEST
49.5kg
Packaging Height
175mm 1,122mm
BEST
Packaging Depth
759mm 228mm
BEST
Packaging Width
1,193mm
BEST
1,816mm
Bezel Width At Bottom
9mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Bezel Width At Top
9mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight
21.1kg
BEST
41.3kg
Height
627mm
BEST
960mm
Depth
83mm 58mm
BEST
Width
1,092mm
BEST
1,681mm

Technical Details

RS-232C
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback