Asus PB287 vs HP Z Display Z27

(335)
Asus PB287
HP Z Display Z27

Top Prices

No prices found No prices found

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
Marginally bigger screen size Edit
The Asus PB287 has a screen size of 28"", however the HP Z Display Z27 is only a 27"" PC monitor (1" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Seven times faster response time Edit
The Asus PB287 is a 1msms response time PC monitor. That's 7ms faster than the HP Z Display Z27 (8msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two HDMI ports Edit
The Asus PB287 has two HDMI ports, however the HP Z Display Z27 only has one HDMI port.
Expert reviews are marginally better
Based on 73 expert reviews, the Asus PB287 has an average review score of 81%, however the HP Z Display Z27 has an average rating of 80% (based on 1 review).
6 Reasons For
11% wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The HP Z Display Z27 is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° wider than the Asus PB287 (178°°).
Slightly wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The HP Z Display Z27 has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°°, however the Asus PB287 is only a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
One more DisplayPort Edit
The HP Z Display Z27 has two DisplayPorts, however the Asus PB287 only has one DisplayPort.
Lighter Edit
The HP Z Display Z27 is a 7.4kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.5g lighter than the Asus PB287 (7.4kgg).
$67 cheaper
The HP Z Display Z27 costs $66.99 less than the Asus PB287.
User reviews are appreciably better
Based on 1 user review, the HP Z Display Z27 has an average review score of 100%, however the Asus PB287 has an average rating of 82% (based on 262 reviews).

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
12% narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Asus PB287 is a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° narrower than the HP Z Display Z27 (178°°).
Slightly narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Asus PB287 has a horizontal viewing angle of 170°°, however the HP Z Display Z27 is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° wider).
One less DisplayPort Edit
The Asus PB287 has one DisplayPort, however the HP Z Display Z27 only has two DisplayPorts.
Heavier Edit
The Asus PB287 is a 7.9kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.5g heavier than the HP Z Display Z27 (7.4kgg).
$67 more expensive
The Asus PB287 is more expensive than the HP Z Display Z27 by $66.99.
Eleven months older
The Asus PB287 is older than the HP Z Display Z27 by eleven months.
Appreciably Lower user review Score
The Asus PB287's average user rating is 82%, however the HP Z Display Z27's is 100% (based on 1 review).
4 Reasons Against
Marginally smaller screen size Edit
The HP Z Display Z27 has a screen size of 27"", however the Asus PB287 is a 28"" PC monitor (1" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Slower response time Edit
The HP Z Display Z27 is an 8msms response time PC monitor. That's 7ms slower than the Asus PB287 (8msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The HP Z Display Z27 has one HDMI port, however the Asus PB287 only has two HDMI ports.
Marginally Lower expert review Score
The HP Z Display Z27's average expert rating is 80%, however the Asus PB287's is 81% (based on 73 reviews).

Awards

21 Awards
alphr.com: Recommended (A List)
altomdata.dk: Test Winner
awardfabrik.de: Golden Wheel
chip.com.my: Recommended
goldfries.com: Recommended Hardware
hardware.info: Excellent
hispazone.com: Recommended Product
itwriter.ru: Recommended
kitguru.net: Must Have
legitreviews.com: Recommended
overclock3d.net: Gold Award
PC Mag: Editor's Choice
techno-labs.com: Good Design
tek.no: Recommended
tomshardware.co.uk: Smart Buy
tomshardware.com: Smart Buy
Trusted Reviews: Recommended
tweaktown.com: Editor's Choice
ua.gecid.com: Gamer's Choice
uk.hardware.info: Gold
vido.com.ua: Recommended
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

33 months Ago 22 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 98.07
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 100.40
Purchase price $ 280.00
Total cost of ownership $ 380.40
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.65T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.65 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
17
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
28"
BEST
27"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 3840 x 2160
 4096 x 2160
 2560 x 1600 (WQXGA)
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1366 х 768
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 768
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 3840 x 2160
 4096 x 2160
 2560 x 1600 (WQXGA)
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1366 х 768
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 768
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
BEST
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 2160p
 2160p
BEST
HD Type
 5K Ultra HD
 5K Ultra HD
BEST
Digital Vertical Frequency
30 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
24 - 99 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 335.34mm
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 335.66mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 596.73mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 60
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 31 - 180
Pixel Pitch
0.16 x 0.16 0.11655 x 0.11655
Display Colour Count
1,073.7M
BEST
1,070M
Vertical Viewing Angle
160° 178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
170° 178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 68.6cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms
BEST
8ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 100%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 1.073 billion colours
 1.073 billion colours
Pixel Density
Unknown - Click to provide data 218

Ports & Interfaces

USB Version
 3.1
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 3.0
 3.1
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 3.0
DisplayPort
1 2
BEST
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 5
HDMI Port
2
BEST
1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Mini DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 5
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 5
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
4W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 130mm
Tilt Angle
20 - -5 -5 - 22
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -180 - 180
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data 10

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 C
 C
BEST
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
60W
BEST
80W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 77kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 125W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192
Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 95
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
10.6kg
BEST
9.7kg
Packaging Height
465mm
BEST
474mm
Packaging Depth
224mm
BEST
285mm
Packaging Width
764mm 730mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 7.4kg
Height With Stand
414mm 380.3mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
220.06mm 217.1mm
BEST
Width With Stand
660mm 634.3mm
BEST
Weight
7.9kg 7.4kg
BEST
Height
380.67mm 380.3mm
Depth
63.55mm 62mm
Width
660.26mm 634.3mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
Feedback