Lenovo X24 vs Samsung LS24E390HL

Samsung LS24E390HL

Top Prices

No prices found No prices found

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The Lenovo X24 is a 23.8"" PC monitor. That's 0.2" bigger than the Samsung LS24E390HL (23.6"). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

A bit bigger viewable height Edit
The Lenovo X24 has a viewable height of 296.5mmmm, whereas the Samsung LS24E390HL is only a 293.22mm viewable height PC monitor (3.28mm smaller).
Bigger viewable width Edit
The Lenovo X24 is a 527mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 5.72mm bigger than the Samsung LS24E390HL (521.28mm).
2% bigger display diagonal Edit
The Lenovo X24 is a 60.45cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.65000000000001cm bigger than the Samsung LS24E390HL (59.8cm).
887x lighter Edit
The Lenovo X24 has a weight of 3.9kgg, whereas the Samsung LS24E390HL is a 3.5kg weight PC monitor (3.5kg heavier).
2 Reasons For
75% faster response time Edit
The Samsung LS24E390HL is a 4ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms faster than the Lenovo X24 (4ms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

A bit lower maximum power consumption Edit
The Samsung LS24E390HL has a maximum power consumption of 25W, whereas the Lenovo X24 is a 27WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (2W higher).

Reasons Against

3 Reasons Against
3ms slower response time Edit
The Lenovo X24 has a response time of 7msms, however the Samsung LS24E390HL is a 4ms response time PC monitor (3ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

8% higher maximum power consumption Edit
The Lenovo X24 is a 27WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 2W higher than the Samsung LS24E390HL (25W).
Older by one month
The Lenovo X24 is one month older than the Samsung LS24E390HL.
5 Reasons Against
0.2" smaller screen size Edit
The Samsung LS24E390HL has a screen size of 23.6", whereas the Lenovo X24 is a 23.8"" PC monitor (0.2" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller viewable height Edit
The Samsung LS24E390HL is a 293.22mm viewable height PC monitor. That's 3.28mm smaller than the Lenovo X24 (293.22mm).
5.72mm smaller viewable width Edit
The Samsung LS24E390HL has a viewable width of 521.28mm, but the Lenovo X24 is a 527mmmm viewable width PC monitor (5.72mm bigger).
Slightly smaller display diagonal Edit
The Samsung LS24E390HL has a display diagonal of 59.8cm, whereas the Lenovo X24 is a 60.45cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.65000000000001cm bigger).
3.5kg heavier Edit
The Samsung LS24E390HL is a 3.5kg weight PC monitor. That's 3.5kg heavier than the Lenovo X24 (3.5kg).

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

20 months Ago 19 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 25.95
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.41
Total running cost $ 27.36

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.18T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.18 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
23.8"
BEST
23.6"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 3000000:1
BEST
 3000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1366 х 768
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 640 x 350
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1366 х 768
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 640 x 350
Backlight Type
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Response Time in 3D
7 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size Diagonal
604.5mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
296.5mm
BEST
293.22mm
Viewable Width
527mm
BEST
521.28mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.2745 x 0.2745 0.2715 x 0.2715
Display Colour Count
16.77M
BEST
16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
60.45cm
BEST
59.8cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
7ms 4ms
BEST
Color Gamut
72% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Out Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Headphone out port
Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Audio Input Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Audio input port
DisplayPort
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

Mac Operating System
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Mac operating system

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-5 - 22 -2 - 15
Tilt Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Tilt adjustment
Plug and Play
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Plug and Play
Stand-By LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Stand-by LED
Power LED
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Power LED
On/off Switch
Unknown - Click to provide data
 On/off switch
LED Indicator
Unknown - Click to provide data
 LED indicator

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 18.5W
Typical Power Consumption
24W 21W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Maximum Power Consumption
27W 25W
BEST
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
8 - 80 10 - 80
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 45 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
Energy Star Certificate
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Energy Star certificate
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 5.1kg
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 139.9mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 125mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 613mm
Bezel Width On Side
2mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
3.9kg
BEST
4kg
Height With Stand
412.8mm 408.9mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
220mm 181.8mm
BEST
Width With Stand
540.9mm
BEST
548.1mm
Weight
3.9kg
BEST
3.5kg
Height
540.9mm 333.2mm
Depth
220mm 69.8mm
Width
412.8mm 548.1mm

Packaging Content

Quick Start Guide
Unknown - Click to provide data
 Quick start guide
Cable Included
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA

Technical Details

No Flickering
Unknown - Click to provide data
 No flickering
Feedback