Query type = select
Use_memache =
Running mysql query
Query run time = 0.13134288787842s
Lenovo T1714p vs NEC E203Wi

Lenovo T1714p vs NEC E203Wi

NEC E203Wi

Top Prices

Factory Outlet Store
In stock
Antonline
Delivery unknown
In stock (200 available)
beachaudio
Delivery unknown
In stock, only 5 left!
Newegg UK
eBay
Standard delivery: $26.99
In stock (12 available)
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

2 Reasons For
Faster response time Edit
The Lenovo T1714p is a 5msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the NEC E203Wi (6msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

91.5mm narrower Edit
The Lenovo T1714p is a 374.5mmmm wide PC monitor, whereas the NEC E203Wi is a 466mmmm wide PC monitor (91.5mm wider).
9 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The NEC E203Wi is a 20"" PC monitor. That's 3" bigger than the Lenovo T1714p (20""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The NEC E203Wi has a vertical viewing angle of 178°°, but the Lenovo T1714p is only a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
Wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The NEC E203Wi is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° wider than the Lenovo T1714p (178°°).
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The NEC E203Wi is a 50cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 6.8cm bigger than the Lenovo T1714p (50cmcm).
6% lower maximum power consumption Edit
The NEC E203Wi is a 17WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 1W lower than the Lenovo T1714p (17WW).
Shorter Edit
The NEC E203Wi has a height of 273mmmm. That's 174.9mm shorter than the Lenovo T1714p (273mmmm).
Cheaper by $5
The NEC E203Wi costs $138.99, whereas the Lenovo T1714p is $144.37.
4 shops are selling it
The more sellers stock the product, the greater competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
$1.26 cheaper to run
Over five years the NEC E203Wi only costs $18.23 to run whereas the Lenovo T1714p costs $19.49 to run (7% more). Read more

Reasons Against

10 Reasons Against
18% smaller screen size Edit
The Lenovo T1714p has a screen size of 17"", however the NEC E203Wi is a 20"" PC monitor (3" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

12% narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Lenovo T1714p is a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° narrower than the NEC E203Wi (178°°).
A little narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Lenovo T1714p has a horizontal viewing angle of 170°°, however the NEC E203Wi is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° wider).
16% smaller display diagonal Edit
The Lenovo T1714p has a display diagonal of 43.2cmcm, however the NEC E203Wi is a 50cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (6.8cm bigger).
1W higher maximum power consumption Edit
The Lenovo T1714p has a maximum power consumption of 18WW, however the NEC E203Wi is a 17WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (1W lower).
A lot taller Edit
The Lenovo T1714p is a 447.9mmmm tall PC monitor, whereas the NEC E203Wi is a 273mmmm tall PC monitor (174.9mm shorter).
$5 more expensive
The Lenovo T1714p is more expensive than the NEC E203Wi by $5.38.
Less retailers
Only 3 stores sells the Lenovo T1714p, whereas 7 shops sell the NEC E203Wi. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Two months older
The Lenovo T1714p is older than the NEC E203Wi by two months.
7% higher running costs over five years
Over five years the Lenovo T1714p costs $19.49 to run which is $1.26 more to run than the NEC E203Wi. Show assumptions.
2 Reasons Against
1ms slower response time Edit
The NEC E203Wi has a response time of 6msms, whereas the Lenovo T1714p is a 5msms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

20% wider Edit
The NEC E203Wi has a width of 466mmmm. That's 91.5mm wider than the Lenovo T1714p (466mmmm).

Date Released

15 months Ago 13 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 17.16
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 19.49
Purchase price $ 144.37
Total cost of ownership $ 163.86
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 18.23
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 18.23
Purchase price $ 138.99
Total cost of ownership $ 157.22
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.13T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.13 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
3
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.12T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.12 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
3
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
17" 20"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1280 x 1024
BEST
 1280 x 1024
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 25000:1
 25000:1
BEST
Display Type
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
BEST
Graphics Resolution
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 640 x 350
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900
 1366 x 768
 1360 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 640 x 350
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900
 1366 x 768
 1360 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768
BEST
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
HD Type
 Not supported
 Not supported
Viewable Size Diagonal
432mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
337.9mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
270.3mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 76
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 31.5 - 81.1
Pixel Pitch
0.264 x 0.264 0.27 x 0.27
Display Colour Count
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
160° 178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
170° 178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
43.2cm 50cm
BEST
Display Technology
 TN
 TN
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms
BEST
6ms
Color Gamut
72% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 5:4
 16:9
 5:4
 16:9
BEST
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPort
1 1
DVI-D Port
1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 1

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Black
 Black
Heavy Metal Free Design
 Hg (mercury)
 Hg (mercury)

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64

Ergonomics

Maximum Height Adjustment
110mm 110mm
Tilt Angle
0 - 22 -5 - 20
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45
OSD Language
8 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.6A
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.35W
Typical Power Consumption
14W
BEST
15W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 23kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
18W 17W
BEST
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 20 - 80
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 45 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 MPR II
 TCO 5.0
 RoHS
 TCO
 MPR II
 TCO 5.0
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Bezel Width At Bottom
Unknown - Click to provide data 17.6mm
Bezel Width At Top
Unknown - Click to provide data 17.6mm
Bezel Width On Side
17.5mm 15.2mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
4kg 4.9kg
BEST
Height With Stand
447.9mm 350mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
244.2mm 213.9mm
BEST
Width With Stand
374.5mm
BEST
466mm
Weight
4kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height
447.9mm 273mm
BEST
Depth
244.2mm
BEST
53.3mm
Width
374.5mm
BEST
466mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
BEST

Other Features

Power Consumption in Economy Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 11W

Technical Details

Light Sensor
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Feedback