AOC U3477 vs LG 34UM68-P

(49)
(45)
AOC u3477
LG 34UM68-P

Top Prices

Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Overstock
eBay
Standard delivery: $59.99
In stock, only 6 left!
MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock
B&H Photo
In stock
eBay
Standard delivery: $29.99
BuyDig
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
Moderately bigger display diagonal Edit
The AOC u3477 has a display diagonal of 86.7cmcm, whereas the LG 34UM68-P is only an 86.36cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.34cm smaller).
20 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The AOC u3477 has a display brightness of 320 cd/m² cd/m², whereas the LG 34UM68-P is only a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (20 cd/m² dimmer).
8% higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The AOC u3477 is a 130mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 10mm higher than the LG 34UM68-P (120mmmm).
0.2W lower power consumption when off Edit
The AOC u3477 has a power consumption when off of 0.1WW, however the LG 34UM68-P is a 0.3WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.2W higher).
Marginally narrower Edit
AOC u3477 is 828mmmm wide, but the LG 34UM68-P is an 829.9mmmm wide PC monitor (1.9mm wider).
Available from 3 shops
A greater number of stores increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
5 Reasons For
More display colour count Edit
LG 34UM68-P is 16.77MM display colours. That's 15.77M more than the AOC u3477 (16.77MM).
Two HDMI ports Edit
The LG 34UM68-P is a two HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the AOC u3477 only has one HDMI port.
Significantly shorter Edit
LG 34UM68-P is 379.8mmmm tall, but the AOC u3477 is a 624.5mmmm tall PC monitor (244.7mm taller).
$204 cheaper
The LG 34UM68-P is $203.72 cheaper than the AOC u3477.
User reviews are better
Based on 45 user reviews, the LG 34UM68-P has an average review score of 90%, whereas the AOC u3477 has an average rating of 85% (based on 13 reviews).

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
16x less display colour count Edit
AOC u3477 is only 1,073.7MM display colours. That's 15.77M less than the LG 34UM68-P (16.77MM).
Only one HDMI port Edit
The AOC u3477 is a one HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the LG 34UM68-P only has two HDMI ports.
244.7mm taller Edit
AOC u3477 is 624.5mmmm tall, but the LG 34UM68-P is a 379.8mmmm tall PC monitor (244.7mm shorter).
$204 more expensive
The AOC u3477 is more expensive than the LG 34UM68-P by $203.72.
Over one year older
The AOC u3477 is older than the LG 34UM68-P by 19 months.
Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the AOC u3477 is 85%, whereas the average user rating of the LG 34UM68-P is 90% (based on 45 reviews).
6 Reasons Against
0.34cm smaller display diagonal Edit
The LG 34UM68-P has a display diagonal of 86.36cmcm, whereas the AOC u3477 is an 86.7cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.34cm bigger).
Slightly dimmer display brightness Edit
The LG 34UM68-P has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² cd/m², whereas the AOC u3477 is a 320 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (20 cd/m² brighter).
Lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The LG 34UM68-P is a 120mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 10mm lower than the AOC u3477 (120mmmm).
Vastly higher power consumption when off Edit
The LG 34UM68-P has a power consumption when off of 0.3WW, however the AOC u3477 is a 0.1WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.2W lower).
1.9mm wider Edit
LG 34UM68-P is 829.9mmmm wide, but the AOC u3477 is an 828mmmm wide PC monitor (1.9mm narrower).
Fewer sellers
Only 5 sellers sells the LG 34UM68-P, but 8 stores sell the AOC u3477. Read more
The smaller the number of retailers that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst retailers to keep prices low.

Awards

12 Awards
altomdata.dk: Recommended
benchmark.pl: Good Product
elektroniktest.dk: Gold
gamezoom.net: Recommended
hardware.info: Silver Award
kitguru.net: Must Have
mobimaniak.pl: Good Buy
nikktech.com: Silver
pcforalla.idg.se: Good Choice
pcgameware.co.uk: Gold
pclab.pl: Recommended
xtremehardware.com: Gold
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

30 months Ago 11 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data

Display

Screen Size
34" 34"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 3440 x 1440
BEST
 3440 x 1440
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 61
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 90
Viewable Height
334.8mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
799.8mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
Vertical Scan Range
23 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 160 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.2325 x 0.2325 0.315 x 0.315
Display Colour Count
1,073.7M 16.77M
BEST
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
86.7cm
BEST
86.36cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
320 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms 5ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

USB 2.0 Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
DVI-D Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Maximum Height Adjustment
130mm
BEST
120mm
Tilt Angle
-5 - 24 Unknown - Click to provide data
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data 14

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption When Off
0.1W
BEST
0.3W
Typical Power Consumption
70W Unknown - Click to provide data
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W 0.3W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 58kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 53W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
13.7kg 11kg
BEST
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 522mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 201mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 978mm
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 8kg
Height With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 548.9mm
Depth With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 252.4mm
Width With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 829.9mm
Weight
10kg
BEST
6kg
Height
624.5mm 379.8mm
BEST
Depth
229.2mm
BEST
49.2mm
Width
828mm
BEST
829.9mm

Technical Details

Number of Colours
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77
Brightness
Unknown - Click to provide data 300
Resolution
Unknown - Click to provide data 60
Contrast Ratio
Unknown - Click to provide data 1000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 793.77 x 340.19
Feedback