Acer B326 vs Acer B346CK vs Acer Predator X34 vs LG 34UM68-P

(38)
(19)
(45)
Acer B326
Acer B346CK
Acer Predator X34
LG 34UM68-P

Top Prices

Newegg UK
Overstock
Delivery unknown
MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock
No prices found No prices found
B&H Photo
In stock
eBay
Standard delivery: $29.99
BuyDig
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
65.5mm bigger viewable height Edit
The Acer B326 is a 398.5mmmm viewable height PC monitor. That's 65.5mm bigger than the Acer B346CK ().
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The Acer B326 has a display brightness of 350 cd/m² cd/m², whereas the Acer B346CK is only a 320 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (30 cd/m² dimmer) and the Acer Predator X34 and the LG 34UM68-P are both only 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Two HDMI ports Edit
The Acer B326 is a two HDMI port PC monitor, and so do the Acer B346CK and the LG 34UM68-P, whereas the Acer Predator X34 only has one HDMI port.
20% higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The Acer B326 is a 150mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor, and so does the Acer B346CK. That's 20mm higher than the Acer Predator X34 (120mmmm) and 30mm higher than the LG 34UM68-P (120mmmm).
Narrower Edit
Acer B326 is 736mmmm wide, but the Acer B346CK is an 827mmmm wide PC monitor (91mm wider), the Acer Predator X34 is an 825mmmm wide PC monitor (89mm wider) and the LG 34UM68-P is an 829.9mmmm wide PC monitor (93.9mm wider).
Available from 1 shops
A greater number of stores increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Superior energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Acer B326 is "B", whereas the rating of the Acer B346CK is "C", the rating of the Acer Predator X34 is "C" and the rating of the LG 34UM68-P is "B".
6 Reasons For
A little bigger screen size Edit
The Acer B346CK has a screen size of 34"" (as do the Acer Predator X34 and the LG 34UM68-P), but the Acer B326 is only a 32"" PC monitor (2" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

12% bigger viewable width Edit
The Acer B346CK has a viewable width of 796mmmm, however the Acer B326 is only a 708.4mmmm viewable width PC monitor (87.6mm smaller).
Two HDMI ports Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the Acer B346CK is two, and so do the Acer B326 and the LG 34UM68-P, but the Acer Predator X34 only has one HDMI port.
30mm higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The Acer B346CK is a 150mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor, and so does the Acer B326. That's 20mm higher than the Acer Predator X34 (120mmmm) and 30mm higher than the LG 34UM68-P (120mmmm).
Lighter Edit
The Acer B346CK is a 10.8kgg weight PC monitor. That's 4.5g lighter than the Acer B326 (6kgg), 4.2g lighter than the Acer Predator X34 (6kgg) and 4.8g heavier than the LG 34UM68-P (6kgg).
Shallower Edit
Acer B346CK is 243mmmm deep. That's 23.5mm shallower than the Acer B326 (49.2mmmm), 65mm shallower than the Acer Predator X34 (49.2mmmm) and 193.8mm deeper than the LG 34UM68-P (49.2mmmm).
9 Reasons For
2" bigger screen size Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has a screen size of 34"" (as do the Acer B346CK and the LG 34UM68-P), however the Acer B326 is only a 32"" PC monitor (2" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

95% more display colour count Edit
The Acer Predator X34 is a 16.77MM display colours PC monitor, and so does the LG 34UM68-P. That's 15.77M more than the Acer B326 (16.77MM).
Slightly bigger display diagonal Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has a display diagonal of 86cmcm, however the Acer B326 is only an 81.3cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (4.7cm smaller), the Acer B346CK is only an 86.4cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.40000000000001cm bigger) and the LG 34UM68-P is only an 86.36cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.36cm bigger).
50% faster response time Edit
The Acer Predator X34 is a 4msms response time PC monitor. That's 2ms faster than the Acer B326 and the Acer B346CK (5msms) and 1ms faster than the LG 34UM68-P (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more DisplayPort Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has two DisplayPorts, however the Acer B326 only has one DisplayPort. Read more

We do not know the number of DisplayPorts on the Acer B346CK or the LG 34UM68-P. It is possible that they do not have any DisplayPorts.

Four USB 3.0 ports Edit
The Acer Predator X34 is a four USB 3.0 port PC monitor, whereas the Acer B326 only has one USB 3.0 port. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 3.0 ports on the Acer B346CK or the LG 34UM68-P. It is possible that they do not have any USB 3.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

A lot higher RMS rated audio power Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has an RMS rated audio power of 7WW, whereas the Acer B326 is only a 4WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor (3W lower). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Six more awards
The Acer Predator X34 has 8 awards, whereas the Acer B326 has 2 awards.
Expert reviews are better
The Acer Predator X34 has an average expert review score of 81%, however the Acer B326 has an average rating of 74% (based on 16 reviews).
10 Reasons For
2" bigger screen size Edit
The LG 34UM68-P has a screen size of 34"" (as do the Acer B346CK and the Acer Predator X34), however the Acer B326 is only a 32"" PC monitor (2" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

95% more display colour count Edit
The LG 34UM68-P is a 16.77MM display colours PC monitor, and so does the Acer Predator X34. That's 15.77M more than the Acer B326 (16.77MM).
Two HDMI ports Edit
The LG 34UM68-P has two HDMI ports, and so do the Acer B326 and the Acer B346CK, however the Acer Predator X34 only has one HDMI port.
0.2W lower power consumption when off Edit
The LG 34UM68-P has a power consumption when off of 0.3WW, but the Acer B326 is a 0.4WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.1W higher) and the Acer B346CK is a 0.5WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.2W higher).
Hugely lower annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 34UM68-P has an annual energy consumption of 58kWhkWh, but the Acer B326 is a 74kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (16kWh higher), the Acer B346CK is an 88kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (30kWh higher) and the Acer Predator X34 is a 93kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (35kWh higher).
Vastly lower maximum power consumption Edit
The LG 34UM68-P has a maximum power consumption of 53WW, however the Acer B346CK is an 88WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (35W higher).
209.2mm shorter Edit
The LG 34UM68-P is a 379.8mmmm tall PC monitor, whereas the Acer B326 is a 473.4mmmm tall PC monitor (93.6mm taller), the Acer B346CK is a 589mmmm tall PC monitor (209.2mm taller) and the Acer Predator X34 is a 455mmmm tall PC monitor (75.2mm taller).
$357 cheaper
The LG 34UM68-P costs $356.99 less than the Acer B326.
Better energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the LG 34UM68-P is "B", however the rating of the Acer B326 is "B", the rating of the Acer B346CK is "C" and the rating of the Acer Predator X34 is "C".
User reviews are a lot better
The LG 34UM68-P has an average user review score of 90% based on 45 reviews, however the Acer B326 has an average rating of 78% (based on 22 reviews) and the Acer Predator X34 has an average rating of 64% (based on 5 reviews).

Reasons Against

18 Reasons Against
2" smaller screen size Edit
The Acer B326 has a screen size of 32"", whereas the Acer B346CK, the Acer Predator X34 and the LG 34UM68-P are all 34"" PC monitors (2" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller viewable width Edit
The Acer B326 has a viewable width of 708.4mmmm, but the Acer B346CK is a 796mmmm viewable width PC monitor (87.6mm bigger).
Less display colour count Edit
Acer B326 is only 1,070MM display colours. That's 15.77M less than the Acer Predator X34 and the LG 34UM68-P (16.77MM).
A little smaller display diagonal Edit
The Acer B326 has a display diagonal of 81.3cmcm, whereas the Acer B346CK is an 86.4cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (5.1cm bigger), the Acer Predator X34 is an 86cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (4.7cm bigger) and the LG 34UM68-P is an 86.36cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (5.06cm bigger).
34% slower response time Edit
The Acer B326 is a 6msms response time PC monitor, and so does the Acer B346CK. That's 2ms slower than the Acer Predator X34 (5msms) and 1ms slower than the LG 34UM68-P (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less DisplayPort Edit
The Acer B326 is a one DisplayPort PC monitor, whereas the Acer Predator X34 only has two DisplayPorts. Read more

We do not know the number of DisplayPorts on the Acer B346CK or the LG 34UM68-P. It is possible that they do not have any DisplayPorts.

Only one USB 3.0 port Edit
The number of USB 3.0 ports on the Acer B326 is one, but the Acer Predator X34 only has four USB 3.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 3.0 ports on the Acer B346CK or the LG 34UM68-P. It is possible that they do not have any USB 3.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Hugely lower RMS rated audio power Edit
The Acer B326 has an RMS rated audio power of 4WW, but the Acer Predator X34 is a 7WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor (3W higher). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

0.1W higher power consumption when off Edit
The Acer B326 has a power consumption when off of 0.4WW, however the Acer B346CK is a 0.5WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.1W higher) and the LG 34UM68-P is a 0.3WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.1W lower).
22% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer B326 has an annual energy consumption of 74kWhkWh, however the Acer B346CK is an 88kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (14kWh higher), the Acer Predator X34 is a 93kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (19kWh higher) and the LG 34UM68-P is a 58kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (16kWh lower).
61% heavier Edit
The Acer B326 is a 15.3kgg weight PC monitor. That's 4.5g heavier than the Acer B346CK (6kgg), 0.3g heavier than the Acer Predator X34 (6kgg) and 9.3g heavier than the LG 34UM68-P (6kgg).
Taller Edit
Acer B326 is 473.4mmmm tall, but the Acer B346CK is a 589mmmm tall PC monitor (115.6mm taller), the Acer Predator X34 is a 455mmmm tall PC monitor (18.4mm shorter) and the LG 34UM68-P is a 379.8mmmm tall PC monitor (93.6mm shorter).
82% deeper Edit
The Acer B326 is a 266.5mmmm deep PC monitor. That's 23.5mm deeper than the Acer B346CK (49.2mmmm), 41.5mm shallower than the Acer Predator X34 (49.2mmmm) and 217.3mm deeper than the LG 34UM68-P (49.2mmmm).
$357 more expensive
The Acer B326 is more expensive than the LG 34UM68-P by $356.99.
Over one year older
The Acer B326 is older than the Acer B346CK by 23 months, older than the Acer Predator X34 by 16 months and older than the LG 34UM68-P by 23 months.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Acer B326 has received 2 awards, the Acer Predator X34 has received 8 awards.
Lower expert review Score
The average expert rating of the Acer B326 is only 74%, whereas the average expert rating of the Acer Predator X34 is 81% (based on 14 reviews).
A lot Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the Acer B326 is only 78%, whereas the average user rating of the LG 34UM68-P is 90% (based on 45 reviews).
10 Reasons Against
Smaller viewable height Edit
The Acer B346CK is a 333mmmm viewable height PC monitor. That's 65.5mm smaller than the Acer B326 ().
Marginally dimmer display brightness Edit
The Acer B346CK has a display brightness of 320 cd/m² cd/m², but the Acer B326 is a 350 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (30 cd/m² brighter) and the Acer Predator X34 and the LG 34UM68-P are both 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (20 cd/m² dimmer).
Slower response time Edit
The Acer B346CK is a 6msms response time PC monitor, and so does the Acer B326. That's 2ms slower than the Acer Predator X34 (5msms) and 1ms slower than the LG 34UM68-P (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

A lot higher power consumption when off Edit
The Acer B346CK has a power consumption when off of 0.5WW, whereas the Acer B326 is a 0.4WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.1W lower) and the LG 34UM68-P is a 0.3WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.2W lower).
30kWh higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer B346CK has an annual energy consumption of 88kWhkWh, whereas the Acer B326 is a 74kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (14kWh lower), the Acer Predator X34 is a 93kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (5kWh higher) and the LG 34UM68-P is a 58kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (30kWh lower).
35W higher maximum power consumption Edit
The Acer B346CK has a maximum power consumption of 88WW, but the LG 34UM68-P is a 53WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (35W lower).
A lot taller Edit
The Acer B346CK has a height of 589mmmm, however the Acer B326 is a 473.4mmmm tall PC monitor (115.6mm shorter), the Acer Predator X34 is a 455mmmm tall PC monitor (134mm shorter) and the LG 34UM68-P is a 379.8mmmm tall PC monitor (209.2mm shorter).
12% wider Edit
The Acer B346CK has a width of 827mmmm, however the Acer B326 is a 736mmmm wide PC monitor (91mm narrower), the Acer Predator X34 is an 825mmmm wide PC monitor (2mm narrower) and the LG 34UM68-P is an 829.9mmmm wide PC monitor (2.9mm wider).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Energy efficiency rating is inferior
The Acer B346CK has an energy efficiency rating of "C", but the Acer B326 has a rating of "B", the Acer Predator X34 has a rating of "C" and the LG 34UM68-P has a rating of "B".
13 Reasons Against
17% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² cd/m² (as does the LG 34UM68-P), however the Acer B326 is a 350 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter) and the Acer B346CK is a 320 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (20 cd/m² brighter).
Only one HDMI port Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has one HDMI port, however the LG 34UM68-P only has two HDMI ports.
Only DVI ports Edit
The number of DVI ports on the Acer Predator X34 is , but the Acer B326 only has one DVI port. Read more

We do not know the number of DVI ports on the Acer B346CK or the LG 34UM68-P. It is possible that they do not have any DVI ports.

Lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The Acer Predator X34 is a 130mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 20mm lower than the Acer B326 and the Acer B346CK (120mmmm) and 10mm higher than the LG 34UM68-P (120mmmm).
A lot higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has an annual energy consumption of 93kWhkWh, but the Acer B326 is a 74kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (19kWh lower), the Acer B346CK is an 88kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (5kWh lower) and the LG 34UM68-P is a 58kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (35kWh lower).
60% heavier Edit
The Acer Predator X34 is a 15kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.3g lighter than the Acer B326 (6kgg), 4.2g heavier than the Acer B346CK (6kgg) and 9g heavier than the LG 34UM68-P (6kgg).
75.2mm taller Edit
The Acer Predator X34 is a 455mmmm tall PC monitor, whereas the Acer B326 is a 473.4mmmm tall PC monitor (18.4mm taller), the Acer B346CK is a 589mmmm tall PC monitor (134mm taller) and the LG 34UM68-P is a 379.8mmmm tall PC monitor (75.2mm shorter).
85% deeper Edit
The Acer Predator X34 has a depth of 308mmmm. That's 41.5mm deeper than the Acer B326 (49.2mmmm), 65mm deeper than the Acer B346CK (49.2mmmm) and 258.8mm deeper than the LG 34UM68-P (49.2mmmm).
89mm wider Edit
The Acer Predator X34 is an 825mmmm wide PC monitor, whereas the Acer B326 is a 736mmmm wide PC monitor (89mm narrower), the Acer B346CK is an 827mmmm wide PC monitor (2mm wider) and the LG 34UM68-P is an 829.9mmmm wide PC monitor (4.9mm wider).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Seven months older
The Acer Predator X34 is older than the Acer B346CK by seven months and older than the LG 34UM68-P by seven months.
Energy efficiency rating is lower
The Acer Predator X34 has an energy efficiency rating of "C", however the Acer B326 has a rating of "B", the Acer B346CK has a rating of "C" and the LG 34UM68-P has a rating of "B".
Vastly Lower user review Score
The Acer Predator X34's average user rating is only 64%, however the Acer B326's is 78% (based on 22 reviews) and the LG 34UM68-P's is 90% (based on 45 reviews).
6 Reasons Against
A little smaller display diagonal Edit
The LG 34UM68-P has a display diagonal of 86.36cmcm, however the Acer B326 is an 81.3cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (5.06cm smaller), the Acer B346CK is an 86.4cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.040000000000006cm bigger) and the Acer Predator X34 is an 86cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.36cm smaller).
17% dimmer display brightness Edit
The LG 34UM68-P has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² cd/m² (as does the Acer Predator X34), however the Acer B326 is a 350 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter) and the Acer B346CK is a 320 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (20 cd/m² brighter).
Slower response time Edit
The LG 34UM68-P is a 5msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the Acer B326 and the Acer B346CK (5msms) and 1ms slower than the Acer Predator X34 (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The LG 34UM68-P is a 120mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 30mm lower than the Acer B326 and the Acer B346CK (120mmmm) and 10mm lower than the Acer Predator X34 (120mmmm).
93.9mm wider Edit
The LG 34UM68-P is an 829.9mmmm wide PC monitor, whereas the Acer B326 is a 736mmmm wide PC monitor (93.9mm narrower), the Acer B346CK is an 827mmmm wide PC monitor (2.9mm narrower) and the Acer Predator X34 is an 825mmmm wide PC monitor (4.9mm narrower).
Less retailers
Only 6 retailers sells the LG 34UM68-P, whereas 7 shops sell the Acer B326. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.

Awards

2 Awards
01net.com: 4 Star
3dnews.ru: Recommended
No awards found 8 Awards
allround-pc.com: Recommended Product
hardwareluxx.de: Excellent Hardware
hardwareluxx.ru: Excellent Hardware
hothardware.com: Editor's Choice
legitreviews.com: Recommended
overclockersclub.com: Gold
SweClockers.com: Good Product
tweaktown.com: Editor's Choice
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

34 months Ago 11 months Ago 19 months Ago 11 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 65.71
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.10
Total running cost $ 67.81
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

No data
0.44T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.44 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
11
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data No data

Display

Screen Size
32" 34"
BEST
34"
BEST
34"
BEST
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
Display Type
 LCD
 LED
 LCD
 LED
BEST
 LCD
 LED
BEST
 LCD
 LED
BEST
Graphics Resolution
 2560 x 1440
 3440 x 1440
 2560 x 1440
 3440 x 1440
BEST
 2560 x 1440
 3440 x 1440
BEST
 2560 x 1440
 3440 x 1440
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
24 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 61
Digital Horizontal Frequency
32 - 88 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 90
Viewable Height
398.5mm
BEST
333mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
708.4mm 796mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.184 x 0.184 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.315 x 0.315
Display Colour Count
1,070M Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
BEST
16.77M
BEST
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 3000:1
BEST
 3000:1
 3000:1
 3000:1
Display Diagonal
81.3cm 86.4cm 86cm
BEST
86.36cm
Display Technology
 VA
 VA
 VA
 VA
Display Brightness
350 cd/m²
BEST
320 cd/m² 300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
6ms 6ms 4ms
BEST
5ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 21:9
 16:9
 21:9
 16:9
 21:9
 16:9
 21:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
Unknown - Click to provide data 109.7 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPort
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 2
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 4
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
2
BEST
2
BEST
1 2
BEST
Mini DisplayPort
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
4 Unknown - Click to provide data 4 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
4W Unknown - Click to provide data 7W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Performance

Mean Time Between Failures
30,000h 30,000h Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Maximum Height Adjustment
150mm
BEST
150mm
BEST
130mm 120mm
Tilt Angle
-5 - 25 -5 - 25 -5 - 35 Unknown - Click to provide data
Swivel Angle Range
-60 - 60 0 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 14

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
BEST
 B
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption When Off
0.4W 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
BEST
Typical Power Consumption
45W 53.6W 0.4W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Standby Power Consumption
0.49W 0.45W 0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
74kWh 88kWh 93kWh 58kWh
BEST
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 88W Unknown - Click to provide data 53W
BEST
Input Voltage
 120
BEST
 120
 120
 120
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
AC Input Voltage
 120
 230
 120-230
 12
 24
 220
 220-240
 240
 20-24
 120
 230
 120-230
 12
 24
 220
 220-240
 240
 20-24
 120
 230
 120-230
 12
 24
 220
 220-240
 240
 20-24
 120
 230
 120-230
 12
 24
 220
 220-240
 240
 20-24

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
20 - 80 20 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 65 20 - 65 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 0 - 40 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
BEST
 TCO
 TCO
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
15.3kg 14.9kg Unknown - Click to provide data 11kg
BEST
Packaging Height
710mm 678mm Unknown - Click to provide data 522mm
BEST
Packaging Depth
225mm 247mm Unknown - Click to provide data 201mm
BEST
Packaging Width
835mm
BEST
943mm Unknown - Click to provide data 978mm
Weight With Stand
672g 10.8kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 8kg
Height With Stand
623.3mm 589mm Unknown - Click to provide data 548.9mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
266.45mm 267mm Unknown - Click to provide data 252.4mm
BEST
Width With Stand
737.8mm
BEST
827mm Unknown - Click to provide data 829.9mm
Weight
15.3kg 10.8kg
BEST
15kg 6kg
Height
473.4mm 589mm 455mm 379.8mm
BEST
Depth
266.5mm 243mm
BEST
308mm 49.2mm
Width
736mm
BEST
827mm 825mm 829.9mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 HDMI
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
BEST
 USB
 HDMI
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
BEST
 USB
 HDMI
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 HDMI
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort

Technical Details

Number of Colours
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77
Brightness
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 300
Resolution
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 60
Contrast Ratio
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
Power Supply Type
Unknown - Click to provide data Internes Netsteil Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 793.77 x 340.19
Feedback