DELL S2715H vs Samsung S27D590 vs Samsung S27E390H

(20)
(99)
(105)
Samsung S27D590
Samsung S27E390H

Top Prices

No prices found
Amazon US
Delivery unknown
Amazon US
Out of stock

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
A bit bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL S2715H has a display diagonal of 68.6cmcm (as does the Samsung S27D590), but the Samsung S27E390H is only a 68.5cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.099999999999994cm smaller).
A lot higher RMS rated audio power Edit
The DELL S2715H has an RMS rated audio power of 18WW, however the Samsung S27D590 is only a 10WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor (8W lower). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

27.1mm shorter Edit
The DELL S2715H has a height of 361.5mmmm, however the Samsung S27D590 is a 388.6mmmm tall PC monitor (27.1mm taller) and the Samsung S27E390H is a 377.2mmmm tall PC monitor (15.7mm taller).
54% shallower Edit
DELL S2715H is 46.1mmmm deep. That's 12.4mm shallower than the Samsung S27D590 (70.8mmmm) and 24.7mm shallower than the Samsung S27E390H (70.8mmmm).
Moderately narrower Edit
The DELL S2715H has a width of 611.2mmmm, however the Samsung S27D590 is a 619.5mmmm wide PC monitor (8.3mm wider) and the Samsung S27E390H is a 626mmmm wide PC monitor (14.8mm wider).
$329 cheaper
The DELL S2715H costs $199.99, whereas the Samsung S27D590 is $529.00.
5 Reasons For
0.099999999999994cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has a display diagonal of 68.6cmcm (as does the DELL S2715H), however the Samsung S27E390H is only a 68.5cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.099999999999994cm smaller).
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² cd/m² (as does the Samsung S27E390H), however the DELL S2715H is only a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Two HDMI ports Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has two HDMI ports, however the Samsung S27E390H only has one HDMI port.
12% lighter Edit
The Samsung S27D590 is a 4.4kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.5g lighter than the DELL S2715H (4.6kgg) and 0.2g lighter than the Samsung S27E390H (4.6kgg).
User reviews are marginally better
Based on 79 user reviews, the Samsung S27D590 has an average review score of 91%, however the DELL S2715H has an average rating of 88% (based on 19 reviews) and the Samsung S27E390H has an average rating of 86% (based on 104 reviews).
5 Reasons For
A bit bigger viewable width Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has a viewable width of 597.9mmmm, whereas the DELL S2715H is only a 597.89mmmm viewable width PC monitor (0.0099999999999909mm smaller).
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² cd/m² (as does the Samsung S27D590), however the DELL S2715H is only a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Faster response time Edit
The Samsung S27E390H is a 4msms response time PC monitor. That's 2ms faster than the DELL S2715H (4msms) and 1ms faster than the Samsung S27D590 (4msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Lower annual energy consumption Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has an annual energy consumption of 37kWhkWh, but the Samsung S27D590 is a 44kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (7kWh higher).
26W lower maximum power consumption Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has a maximum power consumption of 29WW, however the DELL S2715H is a 55WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (26W higher) and the Samsung S27D590 is a 30WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (1W higher).

Reasons Against

9 Reasons Against
0.0099999999999909mm smaller viewable width Edit
The DELL S2715H has a viewable width of 597.89mmmm, however the Samsung S27E390H is a 597.9mmmm viewable width PC monitor (0.0099999999999909mm bigger).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The DELL S2715H has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² cd/m², but the Samsung S27D590 and the Samsung S27E390H are both 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (50 cd/m² brighter).
34% slower response time Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 6msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms slower than the Samsung S27D590 (4msms) and 2ms slower than the Samsung S27E390H (4msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the DELL S2715H is one, and so does the Samsung S27E390H, but the Samsung S27D590 only has two HDMI ports.
A lot higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL S2715H has a maximum power consumption of 55WW, but the Samsung S27D590 is a 30WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (25W lower) and the Samsung S27E390H is a 29WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (26W lower).
Heavier Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 4.9kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.5g heavier than the Samsung S27D590 (4.6kgg) and 0.3g heavier than the Samsung S27E390H (4.6kgg).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Four months older
The DELL S2715H is older than the Samsung S27E390H by four months.
A little Lower user review Score
The DELL S2715H has an average user rating of 88%, but the Samsung S27D590 has an average user rating of 91% (based on 79 reviews).
9 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The Samsung S27D590 is a 5msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms faster than the DELL S2715H (4msms) and 1ms slower than the Samsung S27E390H (4msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

8W lower RMS rated audio power Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has an RMS rated audio power of 10WW, whereas the DELL S2715H is an 18WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor (8W higher). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has an annual energy consumption of 44kWhkWh, but the Samsung S27E390H is a 37kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (7kWh lower).
1W higher maximum power consumption Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has a maximum power consumption of 30WW, however the DELL S2715H is a 55WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (25W higher) and the Samsung S27E390H is a 29WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (1W lower).
Moderately taller Edit
The Samsung S27D590 is a 388.6mmmm tall PC monitor, whereas the DELL S2715H is a 361.5mmmm tall PC monitor (27.1mm shorter) and the Samsung S27E390H is a 377.2mmmm tall PC monitor (11.4mm shorter).
22% deeper Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has a depth of 58.5mmmm. That's 12.4mm deeper than the DELL S2715H (70.8mmmm) and 12.3mm shallower than the Samsung S27E390H (70.8mmmm).
8.3mm wider Edit
The Samsung S27D590 is a 619.5mmmm wide PC monitor, whereas the DELL S2715H is a 611.2mmmm wide PC monitor (8.3mm narrower) and the Samsung S27E390H is a 626mmmm wide PC monitor (6.5mm wider).
$329 more expensive
The Samsung S27D590 is more expensive than the DELL S2715H by $329.01.
One year older
The Samsung S27D590 is older than the DELL S2715H by eight months and older than the Samsung S27E390H by one year.
7 Reasons Against
0.099999999999994cm smaller display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has a display diagonal of 68.5cmcm, however the DELL S2715H and the Samsung S27D590 are both 68.6cmcm display diagonal PC monitors (0.099999999999994cm bigger).
Only one HDMI port Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has one HDMI port, and so does the DELL S2715H, however the Samsung S27D590 only has two HDMI ports.
Heavier Edit
The Samsung S27E390H is a 4.6kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.3g lighter than the DELL S2715H (4.6kgg) and 0.2g heavier than the Samsung S27D590 (4.6kgg).
Moderately taller Edit
The Samsung S27E390H is a 377.2mmmm tall PC monitor, whereas the DELL S2715H is a 361.5mmmm tall PC monitor (15.7mm shorter) and the Samsung S27D590 is a 388.6mmmm tall PC monitor (11.4mm taller).
Deeper Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has a depth of 70.8mmmm. That's 24.7mm deeper than the DELL S2715H (70.8mmmm) and 12.3mm deeper than the Samsung S27D590 (70.8mmmm).
14.8mm wider Edit
The Samsung S27E390H is a 626mmmm wide PC monitor, whereas the DELL S2715H is a 611.2mmmm wide PC monitor (14.8mm narrower) and the Samsung S27D590 is a 619.5mmmm wide PC monitor (6.5mm narrower).
Lower user review Score
The Samsung S27E390H's average user rating is 86%, however the DELL S2715H's is 88% (based on 19 reviews) and the Samsung S27D590's is 91% (based on 79 reviews).

Awards

No awards found 4 Awards
3dnews.ru: Innovative Design
gagadget.com: Recommended
ixbt.com: Original Design
vido.com.ua: Recommended
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

26 months Ago 34 months Ago 22 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data No data

Display

Screen Size
27" 27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 8000000:1
BEST
 8000000:1
 8000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Gloss
 Gloss
 Gloss
Video Mode
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 81 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
336.31mm Unknown - Click to provide data 336.3mm
BEST
Viewable Width
597.89mm Unknown - Click to provide data 597.9mm
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.3114 x 0.3114 0.3114 x 0.3114 0.3114 x 0.3114
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.6cm
BEST
68.6cm
BEST
68.5cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
6ms 5ms 4ms
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Brightness (min)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 240

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 1 1
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 2.0 Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1
DVI Port
USB Type-A Downstream Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
18W
BEST
10W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
Heavy Metal Free Design
 Hg (mercury)
 Hg (mercury)
 Hg (mercury)

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -1 - 15 -2 - 15
Automatic Shut Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Input Current
1.7A Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 17.8W
Typical Power Consumption
20W
BEST
23W 25W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 44kWh 37kWh
BEST
Maximum Power Consumption
55W 30W 29W
BEST
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
Power Consumption (DPMS)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 90 5 - 95 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 10 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 -20 - 45 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 10 - 40 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8.8kg 6.8kg 6.6kg
BEST
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 132mm
BEST
140mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 439mm
BEST
442mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 689mm
BEST
703mm
Weight With Stand
6.7kg 5kg 5.1kg
BEST
Height With Stand
445mm
BEST
465mm 452.9mm
Depth With Stand
196mm 169.2mm
BEST
181.9mm
Width With Stand
611.2mm
BEST
619.5mm 626mm
Weight
4.9kg 4.4kg
BEST
4.6kg
Height
361.5mm
BEST
388.6mm 377.2mm
Depth
46.1mm
BEST
58.5mm 70.8mm
Width
611.2mm
BEST
619.5mm 626mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 HDMI
 VGA
 USB
 HDMI
 VGA
 USB
 HDMI
 VGA

Technical Details

Samsung Magic Function
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data MagicBright, MagicUpscale
Auto Power Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 597.9 x 336.3
Samsung Eye Saver Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Feedback