DELL S2715H vs Samsung S27E370D

(20)
(7)
Samsung S27E370D

Top Prices

No prices found
Amazon US
Out of stock
B&H Photo
Delivery unknown
In stock
Adorama
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
15.7mm shorter Edit
DELL S2715H is 361.5mmmm tall, but the Samsung S27E370D is a 377.2mmmm tall PC monitor (15.7mm taller).
54% shallower Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 46.1mmmm deep PC monitor. That's 24.7mm shallower than the Samsung S27E370D (70.8mmmm).
Slightly narrower Edit
DELL S2715H is 611.2mmmm wide, but the Samsung S27E370D is a 626mmmm wide PC monitor (14.8mm wider).
5 Reasons For
1% bigger viewable width Edit
The Samsung S27E370D is a 597.9mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 0.0099999999999909mm bigger than the DELL S2715H (597.9mmmm).
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The Samsung S27E370D is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the DELL S2715H (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
A lot faster response time Edit
The Samsung S27E370D has a response time of 4msms, but the DELL S2715H is a 6msms response time PC monitor (2ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Slightly lighter Edit
The Samsung S27E370D has a weight of 4.7kgg, however the DELL S2715H is a 4.9kgg weight PC monitor (0.2g heavier).
Considerably better user reviews
The average user review score of the Samsung S27E370D is 100% based on 1 review, however the average rating of the DELL S2715H is 88% (based on 19 reviews).

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
0.0099999999999909mm smaller viewable width Edit
The DELL S2715H has a viewable width of 597.89mmmm, but the Samsung S27E370D is a 597.9mmmm viewable width PC monitor (0.0099999999999909mm bigger).
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The DELL S2715H has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² cd/m², whereas the Samsung S27E370D is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
34% slower response time Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 6msms response time PC monitor. That's 2ms slower than the Samsung S27E370D (4msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

5% heavier Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 4.9kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.2g heavier than the Samsung S27E370D (4.7kgg).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Ten months older
The DELL S2715H is older than the Samsung S27E370D by ten months.
A lot Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the DELL S2715H is 88%, whereas the average user rating of the Samsung S27E370D is 100% (based on 1 review).
3 Reasons Against
5% taller Edit
The Samsung S27E370D is a 377.2mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 15.7mm taller than the DELL S2715H (377.2mmmm).
A lot deeper Edit
The Samsung S27E370D has a depth of 70.8mmmm, however the DELL S2715H is a 46.1mmmm deep PC monitor (24.7mm shallower).
Wider Edit
The Samsung S27E370D is a 626mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 14.8mm wider than the DELL S2715H (626mmmm).

Awards

No awards found 2 Awards
benchmark.pl: Good Product
xtremehardware.com: Silver

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

26 months Ago 17 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data

Display

Screen Size
27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 8000000:1
BEST
 8000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Gloss
 Gloss
Video Mode
 1080p
 720p
 480p
BEST
 1080p
 720p
 480p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Viewable Height
336.31mm 336.3mm
BEST
Viewable Width
597.89mm 597.9mm
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.3114 x 0.3114 0.3114 x 0.3114
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.6cm 68cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
6ms 4ms
BEST
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
Unknown - Click to provide data 12
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 1
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 2.0 Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
USB Type-A Downstream Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
18W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black
Heavy Metal Free Design
 Hg (mercury)
 Hg (mercury)

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -1 - 20

Power

Input Current
1.7A Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Typical Power Consumption
20W
BEST
28W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 41kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
55W Unknown - Click to provide data
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8.8kg 7.2kg
BEST
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 522mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 253mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 694mm
Weight With Stand
6.7kg 5.2kg
BEST
Height With Stand
445mm
BEST
461mm
Depth With Stand
196mm 196.9mm
BEST
Width With Stand
611.2mm
BEST
626mm
Weight
4.9kg 4.7kg
BEST
Height
361.5mm
BEST
377.2mm
Depth
46.1mm
BEST
70.8mm
Width
611.2mm
BEST
626mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 HDMI
 VGA
 USB
 HDMI
 VGA

Technical Details

Samsung Magic Function
Unknown - Click to provide data MagicBright, MagicUpscale
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 597.9 x 336.3
Feedback