Samsung S27D390 vs Samsung S27E391H vs Samsung T27D390

(75)
(104)
(6)
Samsung S27D390
Samsung S27E391H
Samsung T27D390

Top Prices

PC Rush
Delivery unknown
In stock
No prices found No prices found

Reasons For

2 Reasons For
Slightly bigger display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S27D390 has a display diagonal of 68.6cmcm, whereas the Samsung T27D390 is only a 68.58cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.019999999999996cm smaller).
4.6kg lighter Edit
The Samsung S27D390 is a 4.3kgg weight PC monitor. That's 4.6kg lighter than the Samsung S27E391H (4.7kgg) and 0.4g lighter than the Samsung T27D390 (4.7kgg).
4 Reasons For
25% faster response time Edit
The Samsung S27E391H has a response time of 4ms, however the Samsung S27D390 and the Samsung T27D390 are both 5msms response time PC monitors (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

14% lower annual energy consumption Edit
The Samsung S27E391H is a 37kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 5kWh lower than the Samsung S27D390 (41kWhkWh) and 4kWh lower than the Samsung T27D390 (41kWhkWh).
Lower maximum power consumption Edit
The Samsung S27E391H is a 29W maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 0W lower than the Samsung S27D390 (45WW) and 16W lower than the Samsung T27D390 (45WW).
A little better user reviews
The average user review score of the Samsung S27E391H is 86%, whereas the average rating of the Samsung S27D390 is 84% (based on 69 reviews) and the average rating of the Samsung T27D390 is 83% (based on 6 reviews).
1 Reason For
One more HDMI port Edit
The Samsung T27D390 is a two HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the Samsung S27D390 only has one HDMI port and the Samsung S27E391H only has one HDMI port.

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
20% slower response time Edit
The Samsung S27D390 is a 5msms response time PC monitor, and so does the Samsung T27D390. That's 1ms slower than the Samsung S27E391H (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The Samsung S27D390 is a one HDMI port PC monitor, and so does the Samsung S27E391H, whereas the Samsung T27D390 only has two HDMI ports.
12% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Samsung S27D390 has an annual energy consumption of 42kWhkWh, however the Samsung S27E391H is a 37kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (5kWh lower) and the Samsung T27D390 is a 41kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (1kWh lower).
One year older
The Samsung S27D390 is older than the Samsung S27E391H by one year and older than the Samsung T27D390 by five months.
Marginally Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the Samsung S27D390 is 84%, whereas the average user rating of the Samsung S27E391H is 86% (based on 104 reviews).
3 Reasons Against
One less HDMI port Edit
The Samsung S27E391H is a one HDMI port PC monitor (as does the Samsung S27D390), whereas the Samsung T27D390 only has two HDMI ports.
4.6kg heavier Edit
The Samsung S27E391H has a weight of 4.6kg, whereas the Samsung S27D390 is a 4.3kgg weight PC monitor (4.6kg lighter) and the Samsung T27D390 is a 4.7kgg weight PC monitor (4.6kg lighter).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
9 Reasons Against
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The Samsung T27D390 is a 68.58cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.019999999999996cm smaller than the Samsung S27D390 (68.58cmcm).
20% slower response time Edit
The Samsung T27D390 has a response time of 5msms (as does the Samsung S27D390), however the Samsung S27E391H is a 4ms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less DVI port Edit
The Samsung T27D390 has DVI ports, however the Samsung S27D390 only has one DVI port. Read more

We do not know the number of DVI ports on the Samsung S27E391H. It is possible that it does not have any DVI ports.

Higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Samsung T27D390 is a 41kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 1kWh lower than the Samsung S27D390 (41kWhkWh) and 4kWh higher than the Samsung S27E391H (41kWhkWh).
Higher maximum power consumption Edit
The Samsung T27D390 is a 45WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 16W higher than the Samsung S27D390 (45WW) and 16W higher than the Samsung S27E391H (45WW).
Moderately heavier Edit
The Samsung T27D390 has a weight of 4.7kgg, whereas the Samsung S27D390 is a 4.3kgg weight PC monitor (0.4g lighter) and the Samsung S27E391H is a 4.6kg weight PC monitor (4.6kg heavier).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by seven months
The Samsung T27D390 is seven months older than the Samsung S27E391H.
User review Rating is a little Worse
The average user rating of the Samsung T27D390 is 83%, whereas the average user rating of the Samsung S27D390 is 84% (based on 69 reviews) and the Samsung S27E391H is 86% (based on 104 reviews).

Awards

2 Awards
Digitaltrends.com: Recommended Product
ua.gecid.com: Original Design
No awards found No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

34 months Ago 22 months Ago 29 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 30.59
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.40
Total running cost $ 31.99
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.21T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.21 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Display

Screen Size
27" 27"
BEST
27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Gloss
 Gloss
 Gloss
Video Mode
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
56 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 81 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 336.3mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 597.9mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.3114 x 0.3114 0.3114 x 0.3114 Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Colour Count
16.77M
BEST
16.77M 16.77M
BEST
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
178° 178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
178° 178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.6cm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 68.58cm
Display Technology
 PLS
 PLS
 PLS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms 4ms
BEST
5ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
RF Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
SCART Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Composite Video in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Component Video in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
HDMI Port
1 1 2
BEST
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1
Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) Out Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
1
BEST
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

Digital Signal Format
 DVB
 DVB-T
 DVB-C
 DVB
 DVB-T
 DVB-C
 DVB
 DVB-T
 DVB-C
RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 10W
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-1 - 20 -2 - 15 -2 - 18
Automatic Shut Off
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 27

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.3W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
22W
BEST
25W 28W
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W 0.3W
BEST
0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
42kWh 37kWh
BEST
41kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
29W 29W
BEST
45W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 220
 220-240
 20-24
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 220
 220-240
 20-24
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 220
 220-240
 20-24

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 95 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 10 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 45 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
10 - 40 10 - 40 Unknown - Click to provide data

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
6kg 6.7kg
BEST
7.4kg
Packaging Height
437mm 120mm
BEST
439mm
Packaging Depth
132mm
BEST
442mm 151mm
Packaging Width
694mm 703mm 689mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
4.7kg
BEST
5.1kg 5.3kg
Height With Stand
453mm 452.9mm
BEST
466mm
Depth With Stand
209.8mm 181.9mm 169.2mm
BEST
Width With Stand
625.2mm 626mm 619.2mm
BEST
Weight
4.3kg
BEST
4.6kg 4.7kg
Height
376.3mm 377.2mm 366.9mm
Depth
79.6mm 70.8mm 34.1mm
Width
625.2mm 626mm 619.2mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
Feedback