DELL U2913WM vs DELL U3415W vs Samsung LS34E790C vs Samsung S29E790C

(119)
(190)
(59)
DELL U2913WM
Samsung LS34E790C
Samsung S29E790C

Top Prices

Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
eBay
In stock, only 4 left!
Amazon US
Out of stock
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock
Overstock
Adorama
Delivery unknown
In stock (400 available)
B&H Photo
Delivery unknown
In stock
eBay
Standard delivery: $50.99
In stock, only 2 left!
Factory Outlet Store
In stock
PC Rush
Delivery unknown
In stock
eBay
Amazon US
Out of stock

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
15.77M more display colour count Edit
The DELL U2913WM is a 16.77MM display colours PC monitor (as do the Samsung LS34E790C and the Samsung S29E790C), whereas the DELL U3415W is only a 1,073.7MM display colours PC monitor (15.77M less).
Wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The DELL U2913WM is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the Samsung LS34E790C and the Samsung S29E790C. That's 6° wider than the DELL U3415W (178°°).
Two DisplayPorts Edit
The DELL U2913WM has two DisplayPorts, and so does the DELL U3415W, however the Samsung S29E790C only has one DisplayPort.
One more USB 3.0 port Edit
The DELL U2913WM is a five USB 3.0 port PC monitor, whereas the DELL U3415W only has four USB 3.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 3.0 ports on the Samsung LS34E790C or the Samsung S29E790C. It is possible that they do not have any USB 3.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

387mm higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The DELL U2913WM has a maximum height adjustment of 487mmmm, but the DELL U3415W is only a 115mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (372mm lower) and the Samsung LS34E790C and the Samsung S29E790C are both only 100mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitors (387mm lower).
Cheaper by $374
The DELL U2913WM costs $479.01 less than the DELL U3415W, costs $758.73 less than the Samsung LS34E790C and costs $373.62 less than the Samsung S29E790C.
12 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
10 Reasons For
15% bigger screen size Edit
The DELL U3415W is a 34"" PC monitor, and so does the Samsung LS34E790C. That's 5" bigger than the DELL U2913WM and the Samsung S29E790C (29""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

16% bigger viewable height Edit
The DELL U3415W has a viewable height of 334.8mmmm, however the DELL U2913WM is only a 283.82mmmm viewable height PC monitor (50.98mm smaller) and the Samsung S29E790C is only a 283.8mmmm viewable height PC monitor (51mm smaller).
125.43mm bigger viewable width Edit
The DELL U3415W is a 798.2mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 125.43mm bigger than the DELL U2913WM (672.8mmmm) and 125.4mm bigger than the Samsung S29E790C (672.8mmmm).
16% bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL U3415W is an 86.5cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 13.48cm bigger than the DELL U2913WM ().
Two DisplayPorts Edit
The DELL U3415W has two DisplayPorts, and so does the DELL U2913WM, however the Samsung S29E790C only has one DisplayPort.
Six USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports Edit
The DELL U3415W has six USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports, however the DELL U2913WM only has five USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports on the Samsung LS34E790C or the Samsung S29E790C. It is possible that they do not have any USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports.

Five more USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The DELL U3415W is a six USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2913WM only has five USB Type-A downstream ports and the Samsung LS34E790C only has one USB Type-A downstream port. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Samsung S29E790C. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

4W higher RMS rated audio power Edit
The DELL U3415W is an 18WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor. That's 4W higher than the Samsung LS34E790C and the Samsung S29E790C (14WW). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Twelve more awards
The DELL U3415W has 13 awards from expert review sites, whereas the DELL U2913WM has 6 awards and the Samsung S29E790C has 1 award.
Slightly better expert reviews
Based on 33 reviews, the average expert review score of the DELL U3415W is 87%, however the average rating of the DELL U2913WM is 84% (based on 25 reviews) and the average rating of the Samsung S29E790C is 85% (based on 3 reviews).
7 Reasons For
15% bigger screen size Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C has a screen size of 34"" (as does the DELL U3415W), however the DELL U2913WM and the Samsung S29E790C are both only 29"" PC monitors (5" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

95% more display colour count Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C is a 16.77MM display colours PC monitor, and so do the DELL U2913WM and the Samsung S29E790C. That's 15.77M more than the DELL U3415W (16.77MM).
6° wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°° (as do the DELL U2913WM and the Samsung S29E790C), however the DELL U3415W is only a 172°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (6° narrower).
Faster response time Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C is a 4msms response time PC monitor, and so does the Samsung S29E790C. That's 4ms faster than the DELL U2913WM (4msms) and 1ms faster than the DELL U3415W (4msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Larger color gamut Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C is a 99%% color gamut PC monitor. That's 8% larger than the DELL U3415W ().
Two HDMI ports Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C has two HDMI ports, and so does the Samsung S29E790C, however the DELL U3415W only has one HDMI port.
43% shallower Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C has a depth of 51.5mmmm. That's 9.7mm shallower than the DELL U2913WM (68.5mmmm), 21.8mm shallower than the DELL U3415W (68.5mmmm) and 17mm shallower than the Samsung S29E790C (68.5mmmm).
10 Reasons For
Hugely more display colour count Edit
Samsung S29E790C is 16.77MM display colours (as do the DELL U2913WM and the Samsung LS34E790C), but the DELL U3415W is only a 1,073.7MM display colours PC monitor (15.77M less).
4% wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Samsung S29E790C is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the DELL U2913WM and the Samsung LS34E790C. That's 6° wider than the DELL U3415W (178°°).
Vastly faster response time Edit
The Samsung S29E790C has a response time of 4msms (as does the Samsung LS34E790C), however the DELL U2913WM is an 8msms response time PC monitor (4ms slower) and the DELL U3415W is a 5msms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more HDMI port Edit
The Samsung S29E790C is a two HDMI port PC monitor (as does the Samsung LS34E790C), whereas the DELL U3415W only has one HDMI port.
Lower annual energy consumption Edit
The Samsung S29E790C is a 61kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 32kWh lower than the Samsung LS34E790C (61kWhkWh).
Significantly lighter Edit
The Samsung S29E790C has a weight of 4.7kgg, whereas the DELL U2913WM is a 5.8kgg weight PC monitor (1.1g heavier), the DELL U3415W is an 8.4kgg weight PC monitor (3.7g heavier) and the Samsung LS34E790C is a 7.4kgg weight PC monitor (2.7g heavier).
Shorter Edit
Samsung S29E790C is 313.5mmmm tall. That's 3.5mm shorter than the DELL U2913WM (313.5mmmm), 58.5mm shorter than the DELL U3415W (313.5mmmm) and 50.5mm shorter than the Samsung LS34E790C (313.5mmmm).
Narrower Edit
Samsung S29E790C is 699.5mmmm wide. That's 0.29999999999995mm narrower than the DELL U2913WM (699.5mmmm), 125.2mm narrower than the DELL U3415W (699.5mmmm) and 122mm narrower than the Samsung LS34E790C (699.5mmmm).
Energy efficiency rating is superior
The Samsung S29E790C has an energy efficiency rating of "B", whereas the Samsung LS34E790C has a rating of "C".
Better user reviews
The average user review score of the Samsung S29E790C is 94% based on 56 reviews, whereas the average rating of the DELL U2913WM is 86% (based on 94 reviews) and the average rating of the DELL U3415W is 85% (based on 157 reviews).

Reasons Against

17 Reasons Against
18% smaller screen size Edit
The DELL U2913WM is a 29"" PC monitor, and so does the Samsung S29E790C. That's 5" smaller than the DELL U3415W and the Samsung LS34E790C (29""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

18% smaller viewable height Edit
The DELL U2913WM has a viewable height of 283.82mmmm, however the DELL U3415W is a 334.8mmmm viewable height PC monitor (50.98mm bigger) and the Samsung S29E790C is a 283.8mmmm viewable height PC monitor (0.019999999999982mm smaller).
125.43mm smaller viewable width Edit
The DELL U2913WM is a 672.77mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 125.43mm smaller than the DELL U3415W (672.8mmmm) and 0.029999999999973mm smaller than the Samsung S29E790C (672.8mmmm).
19% smaller display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2913WM is a 73.02cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 13.48cm smaller than the DELL U3415W ().
4ms slower response time Edit
The DELL U2913WM has a response time of 8msms, but the DELL U3415W is a 5msms response time PC monitor (3ms faster) and the Samsung LS34E790C and the Samsung S29E790C are both 4msms response time PC monitors (4ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI port Edit
The DELL U2913WM has one HDMI port (as does the DELL U3415W), however the Samsung S29E790C only has two HDMI ports.
Only five USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports Edit
The DELL U2913WM has five USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports, however the DELL U3415W only has six USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports on the Samsung LS34E790C or the Samsung S29E790C. It is possible that they do not have any USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports.

One less USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The DELL U2913WM is a five USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the DELL U3415W only has six USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Samsung S29E790C. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

15% higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL U2913WM is a 90WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 40W lower than the DELL U3415W () and 13W higher than the Samsung LS34E790C ().
19% heavier Edit
The DELL U2913WM has a weight of 5.8kgg, however the DELL U3415W is an 8.4kgg weight PC monitor (2.6g heavier), the Samsung LS34E790C is a 7.4kgg weight PC monitor (1.6g heavier) and the Samsung S29E790C is a 4.7kgg weight PC monitor (1.1g lighter).
Taller Edit
The DELL U2913WM is a 317mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 55mm shorter than the DELL U3415W (313.5mmmm), 47mm shorter than the Samsung LS34E790C (313.5mmmm) and 3.5mm taller than the Samsung S29E790C (313.5mmmm).
16% deeper Edit
The DELL U2913WM has a depth of 61.2mmmm, however the DELL U3415W is a 73.3mmmm deep PC monitor (12.1mm deeper), the Samsung LS34E790C is a 51.5mmmm deep PC monitor (9.7mm shallower) and the Samsung S29E790C is a 68.5mmmm deep PC monitor (7.3mm deeper).
1% wider Edit
The DELL U2913WM is a 699.8mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 124.9mm narrower than the DELL U3415W (699.5mmmm), 121.7mm narrower than the Samsung LS34E790C (699.5mmmm) and 0.29999999999995mm wider than the Samsung S29E790C (699.5mmmm).
Older by over two years
The DELL U2913WM is eleven months older than the DELL U3415W, two years older than the Samsung LS34E790C and 14 months older than the Samsung S29E790C.
Seven less awards
The DELL U2913WM has only received 6 awards, whereas the DELL U3415W has received 13 awards.
Expert review Rating is slightly Worse
The DELL U2913WM's average expert score is 84%, however the DELL U3415W's is 87% (based on 33 reviews) and the Samsung S29E790C's is 85% (based on 3 reviews).
User review Rating is Worse
The DELL U2913WM's average user score is 86%, however the Samsung S29E790C's is 94% (based on 56 reviews).
16 Reasons Against
Less display colour count Edit
The DELL U3415W is a 1,073.7MM display colours PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2913WM, the Samsung LS34E790C and the Samsung S29E790C are all 16.77MM display colours PC monitors (15.77M more).
Narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The DELL U3415W is a 172°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 6° narrower than the DELL U2913WM, the Samsung LS34E790C and the Samsung S29E790C (178°°).
Slower response time Edit
The DELL U3415W has a response time of 5msms, but the DELL U2913WM is an 8msms response time PC monitor (3ms slower) and the Samsung LS34E790C and the Samsung S29E790C are both 4msms response time PC monitors (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

A bit smaller color gamut Edit
The DELL U3415W has a color gamut of 91%%, however the Samsung LS34E790C is a 99%% color gamut PC monitor (8% larger).
One less USB 3.0 port Edit
The DELL U3415W is a four USB 3.0 port PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2913WM only has five USB 3.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 3.0 ports on the Samsung LS34E790C or the Samsung S29E790C. It is possible that they do not have any USB 3.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

One less HDMI port Edit
The DELL U3415W has one HDMI port (as does the DELL U2913WM), however the Samsung S29E790C only has two HDMI ports.
One less DVI port Edit
The number of DVI ports on the DELL U3415W is , but the DELL U2913WM only has one DVI port. Read more

We do not know the number of DVI ports on the Samsung LS34E790C or the Samsung S29E790C. It is possible that they do not have any DVI ports.

Lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The DELL U3415W has a maximum height adjustment of 115mmmm, but the DELL U2913WM is a 487mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (372mm higher) and the Samsung LS34E790C and the Samsung S29E790C are both 100mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitors (15mm lower).
3.7g heavier Edit
The DELL U3415W has a weight of 8.4kgg, however the DELL U2913WM is a 5.8kgg weight PC monitor (2.6g lighter), the Samsung LS34E790C is a 7.4kgg weight PC monitor (1g lighter) and the Samsung S29E790C is a 4.7kgg weight PC monitor (3.7g lighter).
58.5mm taller Edit
The DELL U3415W is a 372mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 55mm taller than the DELL U2913WM (313.5mmmm), 8mm taller than the Samsung LS34E790C (313.5mmmm) and 58.5mm taller than the Samsung S29E790C (313.5mmmm).
21.8mm deeper Edit
The DELL U3415W has a depth of 73.3mmmm, however the DELL U2913WM is a 61.2mmmm deep PC monitor (12.1mm shallower), the Samsung LS34E790C is a 51.5mmmm deep PC monitor (21.8mm shallower) and the Samsung S29E790C is a 68.5mmmm deep PC monitor (4.8mm shallower).
125.2mm wider Edit
The DELL U3415W is an 824.7mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 124.9mm wider than the DELL U2913WM (699.5mmmm), 3.2mm wider than the Samsung LS34E790C (699.5mmmm) and 125.2mm wider than the Samsung S29E790C (699.5mmmm).
More expensive by $479
The DELL U3415W is $479.01 more expensive than the DELL U2913WM and $105.39 more expensive than the Samsung S29E790C.
Less retailers
The DELL U3415W is only stocked by 9 shops, whereas the DELL U2913WM is stocked by 14 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by over one year
The DELL U3415W is 15 months older than the Samsung LS34E790C and three months older than the Samsung S29E790C.
User review Rating is Worse
The DELL U3415W's average user score is 85%, however the DELL U2913WM's is 86% (based on 94 reviews) and the Samsung S29E790C's is 94% (based on 56 reviews).
11 Reasons Against
One less DisplayPort Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C has one DisplayPort (as does the Samsung S29E790C), however the DELL U3415W only has two DisplayPorts.
Only one USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C is a one USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2913WM only has five USB Type-A downstream ports and the DELL U3415W only has six USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Samsung S29E790C. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

A lot lower RMS rated audio power Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C has an RMS rated audio power of 14WW (as does the Samsung S29E790C), whereas the DELL U3415W is an 18WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor (4W higher). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C is a 100mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor, and so does the Samsung S29E790C. That's 387mm lower than the DELL U2913WM (100mmmm) and 15mm lower than the DELL U3415W (100mmmm).
A lot higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C has an annual energy consumption of 93kWhkWh, but the Samsung S29E790C is a 61kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (32kWh lower).
37% heavier Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C is a 7.4kgg weight PC monitor. That's 1.6g heavier than the DELL U2913WM (4.7kgg), 1g lighter than the DELL U3415W (4.7kgg) and 2.7g heavier than the Samsung S29E790C (4.7kgg).
50.5mm taller Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C is a 364mmmm tall PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2913WM is a 317mmmm tall PC monitor (47mm shorter), the DELL U3415W is a 372mmmm tall PC monitor (8mm taller) and the Samsung S29E790C is a 313.5mmmm tall PC monitor (50.5mm shorter).
122mm wider Edit
The Samsung LS34E790C is an 821.5mmmm wide PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2913WM is a 699.8mmmm wide PC monitor (121.7mm narrower), the DELL U3415W is an 824.7mmmm wide PC monitor (3.2mm wider) and the Samsung S29E790C is a 699.5mmmm wide PC monitor (122mm narrower).
$759 more expensive
The Samsung LS34E790C is more expensive than the DELL U2913WM by $758.73, more expensive than the DELL U3415W by $279.72 and more expensive than the Samsung S29E790C by $385.11.
Less retailers
Only 7 sellers sells the Samsung LS34E790C, whereas 14 shops sell the DELL U2913WM and 9 shops sell the DELL U3415W. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Energy efficiency rating is lower
The Samsung LS34E790C has an energy efficiency rating of "C", however the Samsung S29E790C has a rating of "B".
12 Reasons Against
5" smaller screen size Edit
The Samsung S29E790C is a 29"" PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2913WM. That's 5" smaller than the DELL U3415W and the Samsung LS34E790C (29""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

51mm smaller viewable height Edit
The Samsung S29E790C has a viewable height of 283.8mmmm, whereas the DELL U2913WM is a 283.82mmmm viewable height PC monitor (0.019999999999982mm bigger) and the DELL U3415W is a 334.8mmmm viewable height PC monitor (51mm bigger).
Smaller viewable width Edit
The Samsung S29E790C is a 672.8mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 0.029999999999973mm bigger than the DELL U2913WM (672.8mmmm) and 125.4mm smaller than the DELL U3415W (672.8mmmm).
Only one DisplayPort Edit
The Samsung S29E790C is a one DisplayPort PC monitor, and so does the Samsung LS34E790C, whereas the DELL U3415W only has two DisplayPorts.
Lower RMS rated audio power Edit
The Samsung S29E790C is a 14WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor, and so does the Samsung LS34E790C. That's 4W lower than the DELL U3415W (14WW). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

4x lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The Samsung S29E790C has a maximum height adjustment of 100mmmm (as does the Samsung LS34E790C), however the DELL U2913WM is a 487mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (387mm higher) and the DELL U3415W is a 115mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (15mm higher).
17mm deeper Edit
The Samsung S29E790C is a 68.5mmmm deep PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2913WM is a 61.2mmmm deep PC monitor (7.3mm shallower), the DELL U3415W is a 73.3mmmm deep PC monitor (4.8mm deeper) and the Samsung LS34E790C is a 51.5mmmm deep PC monitor (17mm shallower).
More expensive by $374
The Samsung S29E790C is $373.62 more expensive than the DELL U2913WM.
Fewer sellers
The Samsung S29E790C is only stocked by 2 shops, but the DELL U2913WM is stocked by 14 stores, the DELL U3415W is stocked by 9 retailers and the Samsung LS34E790C is stocked by 7 retailers. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Older by one year
The Samsung S29E790C is one year older than the Samsung LS34E790C.
Twelve less awards
The Samsung S29E790C has only received 1 award, but the DELL U2913WM has received 6 awards and the DELL U3415W has received 13 awards.
Expert review Rating is a bit Worse
The average expert rating of the Samsung S29E790C is 85%, whereas the average expert rating of the DELL U3415W is 87% (based on 33 reviews).

Awards

6 Awards
01net.com: 4 Star
alphr.com: Recommended
chinese.vr-zone.com: Editor's Choice
hardware.info: Silver Award
profesionalreview.com: Gold
uk.hardware.info: Silver
13 Awards
altomdata.dk: Recommended
Digitaltrends.com: Recommended Product
hardware.info: Silver Award
hardwareluxx.de: Value for Money
hardwareluxx.ru: Recommended
itc.ua: Recommended
PC Mag: Editor's Choice
pcforalla.idg.se: Best in Test
tek.no: Recommended
tomshardware.co.uk: Editor Recommended
tomshardware.com: Editor Recommended
tomshw.it: Editor Recommended
vido.com.ua: Recommended
No awards found 1 Award
vido.com.ua: Recommended

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

35 months Ago 24 months Ago 9 months Ago 22 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data No data No data

Display

Screen Size
29" 34"
BEST
34"
BEST
29"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 2000000:1
BEST
 2000000:1
BEST
 2000000:1
 2000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 2560 x 1080
 3440 x 1440
 2560 x 1080
 3440 x 1440
BEST
 2560 x 1080
 3440 x 1440
BEST
 2560 x 1080
 3440 x 1440
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1440p
 1440p
BEST
 1440p
 1440p
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
Viewable Height
283.82mm 334.8mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 283.8mm
Viewable Width
672.77mm 798.2mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 672.8mm
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
 21:9
 21:9
Pixel Pitch
0.09 x 0.26 0.2325 x 0.2325 Unknown - Click to provide data 0.2628 x 0.2628
Display Colour Count
16.77M
BEST
1,073.7M 16.77M
BEST
16.77M
BEST
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
172° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 3000:1
 3000:1
 3000:1
BEST
 3000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
73.02cm 86.5cm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m² 300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
8ms 5ms 4ms
BEST
4ms
BEST
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 91% 99%
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Curved
 Curved
 Curved
 Curved
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
 21:9
 21:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Brightness (min)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 250
Maximum Refresh Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 60Hz

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
DisplayPort
2
BEST
2
BEST
1 1
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 Port
5
BEST
4 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 1 2
BEST
2
BEST
DVI-D Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Mini DisplayPort
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
5 6
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
5 6
BEST
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 4 Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 18W
BEST
14W 14W
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 2 2

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64

Ergonomics

Maximum Height Adjustment
487mm
BEST
115mm 100mm 100mm
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -2 - 20 -2 - 20

Power

Input Current
1.5A 1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Current Rating
1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
 B
 B
BEST
Typical Power Consumption
32W 55W 64W 29.1W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W 0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 93kWh 61kWh
BEST
Maximum Power Consumption
90W 130W
BEST
77W Unknown - Click to provide data
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
Power Consumption (DPMS)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 10668 0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 90 5 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 10 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 -20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 0 - 40 Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 RoHS
BEST
 TCO
 RoHS
BEST
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
11.4kg 16.4kg 14.4kg 10.9kg
BEST
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 531mm 499mm
BEST
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 339mm 325mm
BEST
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 899mm 775mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
8.3kg Unknown - Click to provide data 9.9kg 7.2kg
BEST
Height With Stand
358.7mm
BEST
408.7mm 552mm 423.7mm
Depth With Stand
194.2mm
BEST
216mm 275.5mm 262.6mm
Width With Stand
699.8mm 824.7mm 821.5mm 699.5mm
BEST
Weight
5.8kg 8.4kg 7.4kg 4.7kg
BEST
Height
317mm 372mm 364mm 313.5mm
BEST
Depth
61.2mm 73.3mm 51.5mm
BEST
68.5mm
Width
699.8mm 824.7mm 821.5mm 699.5mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
 USB
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
 USB
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
 USB
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
Interface Adapters Included
 DisplayPort female - mini DisplayPort male
 DisplayPort female - mini DisplayPort male
 DisplayPort female - mini DisplayPort male
 DisplayPort female - mini DisplayPort male

Other Features

Power Consumption in Sleep Mode
0.5 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Technical Details

Samsung Magic Function
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data MagicBright
Sleep Timer
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 672.8 x 283.8
Samsung Eye Saver Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Feedback