Asus MX239H vs Asus VS278 vs DELL S2715H vs LG 24MP58VQ

(250)
(354)
(20)
(3)
Asus MX239H
Asus VS278
LG 24MP58VQ

Top Prices

Newegg UK
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
B&H Photo
In stock
Newegg UK
eBay
In stock, only 3 left!
Newegg US
In stock
eBay
Overstock
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
pestmall
Delivery unknown
eBay
Standard delivery: $29.99
Best Buy
Next day delivery: $37.89
In stock
NT ELECTRONICS LLC
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
11% wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Asus MX239H has a vertical viewing angle of 178°° (as do the DELL S2715H and the LG 24MP58VQ), however the Asus VS278 is only a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
5% wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Asus MX239H is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the DELL S2715H and the LG 24MP58VQ. That's 8° wider than the Asus VS278 (178°°).
One more HDMI port Edit
The Asus MX239H has two HDMI ports, however the LG 24MP58VQ only has one HDMI port.
Higher RMS rated audio power Edit
The Asus MX239H is a 6WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor. That's 2W higher than the Asus VS278 () and 12W lower than the DELL S2715H (). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Vastly shallower Edit
The Asus MX239H has a depth of 207.2mmmm, however the Asus VS278 is a 50mmmm deep PC monitor (157.2mm shallower), the DELL S2715H is a 46.1mmmm deep PC monitor (161.1mm shallower) and the LG 24MP58VQ is a 332.1mmmm deep PC monitor (124.9mm deeper).
125.8mm narrower Edit
The Asus MX239H is a 522.2mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 125.8mm narrower than the Asus VS278 (550.5mmmm), 89mm narrower than the DELL S2715H (550.5mmmm) and 28.3mm narrower than the LG 24MP58VQ (550.5mmmm).
Considerably better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the Asus MX239H is 77%, however the average rating of the Asus VS278 is 60% (based on 3 reviews).
5 Reasons For
15% bigger screen size Edit
The Asus VS278 is a 27"" PC monitor, and so does the DELL S2715H. That's 4" bigger than the Asus MX239H (24"") and 3" bigger than the LG 24MP58VQ (24""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

15% bigger display diagonal Edit
The Asus VS278 is a 68.6cmcm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the DELL S2715H. That's 10.2cm bigger than the Asus MX239H ().
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The Asus VS278 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Asus MX239H, the DELL S2715H and the LG 24MP58VQ (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
5x faster response time Edit
The Asus VS278 has a response time of 1msms, but the Asus MX239H and the LG 24MP58VQ are both 5msms response time PC monitors (4ms slower) and the DELL S2715H is a 6msms response time PC monitor (5ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

9 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
5 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 27"" PC monitor, and so does the Asus VS278. That's 4" bigger than the Asus MX239H (24"") and 3" bigger than the LG 24MP58VQ (24""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The DELL S2715H has a vertical viewing angle of 178°° (as do the Asus MX239H and the LG 24MP58VQ), but the Asus VS278 is only a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
5% wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the Asus MX239H and the LG 24MP58VQ. That's 8° wider than the Asus VS278 (178°°).
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 68.6cmcm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the Asus VS278. That's 10.2cm bigger than the Asus MX239H ().
31% shorter Edit
The DELL S2715H has a height of 361.5mmmm. That's 30.7mm shorter than the Asus MX239H (85.5mmmm), 108.61mm shorter than the Asus VS278 (85.5mmmm) and 276mm taller than the LG 24MP58VQ (85.5mmmm).
6 Reasons For
18° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The LG 24MP58VQ is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the Asus MX239H and the DELL S2715H. That's 18° wider than the Asus VS278 (178°°).
8° wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The LG 24MP58VQ has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°° (as do the Asus MX239H and the DELL S2715H), whereas the Asus VS278 is only a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
0.2W lower power consumption when off Edit
The LG 24MP58VQ has a power consumption when off of 0.3WW, however the Asus MX239H is a 0.5WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.2W higher).
83% lighter Edit
The LG 24MP58VQ is a 2.8kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.9g lighter than the Asus MX239H (2.8kgg), 2.3g lighter than the Asus VS278 (2.8kgg) and 2.1g lighter than the DELL S2715H (2.8kgg).
$32 cheaper
The LG 24MP58VQ is $32.44 cheaper than the Asus MX239H, $56.44 cheaper than the Asus VS278 and $36.44 cheaper than the DELL S2715H.
User reviews are better
The LG 24MP58VQ has an average user review score of 100%, whereas the Asus MX239H has an average rating of 91% (based on 244 reviews), the Asus VS278 has an average rating of 87% (based on 351 reviews) and the DELL S2715H has an average rating of 88% (based on 19 reviews).

Reasons Against

11 Reasons Against
18% smaller screen size Edit
The Asus MX239H is a 23"" PC monitor. That's 4" smaller than the Asus VS278 and the DELL S2715H (24"") and 1" smaller than the LG 24MP58VQ (24""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

18% smaller display diagonal Edit
The Asus MX239H is a 58.4cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 10.2cm smaller than the Asus VS278 and the DELL S2715H ().
20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Asus MX239H is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so do the DELL S2715H and the LG 24MP58VQ. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus VS278 (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
Hugely slower response time Edit
The Asus MX239H has a response time of 5msms (as does the LG 24MP58VQ), but the Asus VS278 is a 1msms response time PC monitor (4ms faster) and the DELL S2715H is a 6msms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

40% higher power consumption when off Edit
The Asus MX239H is a 0.5WW power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.2W higher than the LG 24MP58VQ (0.3WW).
25% heavier Edit
The Asus MX239H has a weight of 3.7kgg, however the Asus VS278 is a 5.1kgg weight PC monitor (1.4g heavier), the DELL S2715H is a 4.9kgg weight PC monitor (1.2g heavier) and the LG 24MP58VQ is a 2.8kgg weight PC monitor (0.9g lighter).
79% taller Edit
The Asus MX239H is a 392.2mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 77.91mm shorter than the Asus VS278 (85.5mmmm), 30.7mm taller than the DELL S2715H (85.5mmmm) and 306.7mm taller than the LG 24MP58VQ (85.5mmmm).
More expensive by $32
The Asus MX239H is $32.44 more expensive than the LG 24MP58VQ.
Less retailers
The Asus MX239H is only stocked by 14 shops, whereas the Asus VS278 is stocked by 16 stores. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by over three years
The Asus MX239H is two years older than the DELL S2715H and three years older than the LG 24MP58VQ.
User review Rating is Worse
The Asus MX239H's average user score is 91%, however the LG 24MP58VQ's is 100% (based on 3 reviews).
13 Reasons Against
12% narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Asus VS278 has a vertical viewing angle of 160°°, however the Asus MX239H, the DELL S2715H and the LG 24MP58VQ are all 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitors (18° wider).
Narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Asus VS278 is a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° narrower than the Asus MX239H, the DELL S2715H and the LG 24MP58VQ (178°°).
One less HDMI port Edit
The Asus VS278 has one HDMI port (as do the DELL S2715H and the LG 24MP58VQ), however the Asus MX239H only has two HDMI ports.
One less DVI port Edit
The number of DVI ports on the Asus VS278 is , but the LG 24MP58VQ only has one DVI port. Read more

We do not know the number of DVI ports on the Asus MX239H or the DELL S2715H. It is possible that they do not have any DVI ports.

Lower RMS rated audio power Edit
The Asus VS278 is a 4WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor. That's 2W lower than the Asus MX239H () and 14W lower than the DELL S2715H (). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

2.3g heavier Edit
The Asus VS278 has a weight of 5.1kgg, however the Asus MX239H is a 3.7kgg weight PC monitor (1.4g lighter), the DELL S2715H is a 4.9kgg weight PC monitor (0.2g lighter) and the LG 24MP58VQ is a 2.8kgg weight PC monitor (2.3g lighter).
Taller Edit
The Asus VS278 is a 470.11mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 77.91mm taller than the Asus MX239H (85.5mmmm), 108.61mm taller than the DELL S2715H (85.5mmmm) and 384.61mm taller than the LG 24MP58VQ (85.5mmmm).
3.9mm deeper Edit
The Asus VS278 has a depth of 50mmmm, however the Asus MX239H is a 207.2mmmm deep PC monitor (157.2mm deeper), the DELL S2715H is a 46.1mmmm deep PC monitor (3.9mm shallower) and the LG 24MP58VQ is a 332.1mmmm deep PC monitor (282.1mm deeper).
125.8mm wider Edit
The Asus VS278 is a 648mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 125.8mm wider than the Asus MX239H (550.5mmmm), 36.8mm wider than the DELL S2715H (550.5mmmm) and 97.5mm wider than the LG 24MP58VQ (550.5mmmm).
More expensive by $56
The Asus VS278 is $24 more expensive than the Asus MX239H, $20 more expensive than the DELL S2715H and $56.44 more expensive than the LG 24MP58VQ.
Older by over three years
The Asus VS278 is one month older than the Asus MX239H, two years older than the DELL S2715H and three years older than the LG 24MP58VQ.
Expert review Rating is much Worse
The Asus VS278's average expert score is only 60%, however the Asus MX239H's is 77% (based on 6 reviews).
User review Rating is much Worse
The Asus VS278's average user score is 87%, however the Asus MX239H's is 91% (based on 244 reviews), the DELL S2715H's is 88% (based on 19 reviews) and the LG 24MP58VQ's is 100% (based on 3 reviews).
10 Reasons Against
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so do the Asus MX239H and the LG 24MP58VQ. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus VS278 (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
Significantly slower response time Edit
The DELL S2715H has a response time of 6msms, whereas the Asus MX239H and the LG 24MP58VQ are both 5msms response time PC monitors (1ms faster) and the Asus VS278 is a 1msms response time PC monitor (5ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the DELL S2715H is one (as do the Asus VS278 and the LG 24MP58VQ), but the Asus MX239H only has two HDMI ports.
One less DVI port Edit
The DELL S2715H is a DVI port PC monitor, whereas the LG 24MP58VQ only has one DVI port. Read more

We do not know the number of DVI ports on the Asus MX239H or the Asus VS278. It is possible that they do not have any DVI ports.

A lot heavier Edit
The DELL S2715H has a weight of 4.9kgg, but the Asus MX239H is a 3.7kgg weight PC monitor (1.2g lighter), the Asus VS278 is a 5.1kgg weight PC monitor (0.2g heavier) and the LG 24MP58VQ is a 2.8kgg weight PC monitor (2.1g lighter).
15% wider Edit
The DELL S2715H has a width of 611.2mmmm. That's 89mm wider than the Asus MX239H (550.5mmmm), 36.8mm narrower than the Asus VS278 (550.5mmmm) and 60.7mm wider than the LG 24MP58VQ (550.5mmmm).
More expensive by $36
The DELL S2715H is $4 more expensive than the Asus MX239H and $36.44 more expensive than the LG 24MP58VQ.
Not as many stockists
The DELL S2715H is only stocked by 11 retailers, however the Asus MX239H is stocked by 14 stores and the Asus VS278 is stocked by 16 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by over one year
The DELL S2715H is 16 months older than the LG 24MP58VQ.
User review Rating is considerably Worse
The DELL S2715H has an average user score of 88%, but the Asus MX239H has an average user rating of 91% (based on 244 reviews) and the LG 24MP58VQ has an average user rating of 100% (based on 3 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
3" smaller screen size Edit
The LG 24MP58VQ has a screen size of 24"", whereas the Asus MX239H is a 23"" PC monitor (1" smaller) and the Asus VS278 and the DELL S2715H are both 27"" PC monitors (3" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The LG 24MP58VQ has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² cd/m² (as do the Asus MX239H and the DELL S2715H), whereas the Asus VS278 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
80% slower response time Edit
The LG 24MP58VQ is a 5msms response time PC monitor, and so does the Asus MX239H. That's 4ms slower than the Asus VS278 (5msms) and 1ms faster than the DELL S2715H (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The LG 24MP58VQ is a one HDMI port PC monitor, and so do the Asus VS278 and the DELL S2715H, whereas the Asus MX239H only has two HDMI ports.
87% deeper Edit
The LG 24MP58VQ is a 332.1mmmm deep PC monitor. That's 124.9mm deeper than the Asus MX239H (332.1mmmm), 282.1mm deeper than the Asus VS278 (332.1mmmm) and 286mm deeper than the DELL S2715H (332.1mmmm).
A little wider Edit
LG 24MP58VQ is 550.5mmmm wide, but the Asus MX239H is a 522.2mmmm wide PC monitor (28.3mm narrower), the Asus VS278 is a 648mmmm wide PC monitor (97.5mm wider) and the DELL S2715H is a 611.2mmmm wide PC monitor (60.7mm wider).
Fewer sellers
Only 7 retailers sells the LG 24MP58VQ, but 14 retailers sell the Asus MX239H, 16 shops sell the Asus VS278 and 11 sellers sell the DELL S2715H. Read more
The smaller the number of stores that stock this PC monitor, the lower the competition amongst stores to keep prices low.

Awards

2 Awards
hardwaremx.com: Gold Award
maxit.com.my: Design Award
No awards found No awards found No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

50 months Ago 51 months Ago 26 months Ago 11 months Ago

Display

Screen Size
23" 27"
BEST
27"
BEST
24"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 720p
 480p
BEST
 1080p
 720p
 480p
BEST
 1080p
 720p
 480p
BEST
 1080p
 720p
 480p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
28 - 83 30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 336.31mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 597.89mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
28 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.2652 x 0.2652 0.311 x 0.311 0.3114 x 0.3114 0.2745 x 0.2745
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M 16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
160° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
170° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
58.4cm 68.6cm
BEST
68.6cm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms 1ms
BEST
6ms 5ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
2
BEST
1 1 1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
BEST
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
6W
BEST
4W 18W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 2 2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 -5 - 20 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Input Current
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.7A Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
BEST
Typical Power Consumption
33W 45W 20W
BEST
26W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W
BEST
0.5W
BEST
0.5W
BEST
23W
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 55W Unknown - Click to provide data
Input Voltage
 110 - 240
BEST
 110 - 240
BEST
 110 - 240
BEST
 110 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40 Unknown - Click to provide data

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
Compliance Industry Standard
 Rohs
 Rohs
BEST
 Rohs
 Rohs
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
6.1kg
BEST
7.2kg 8.8kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Height
472mm
BEST
541mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Depth
131mm
BEST
175mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
615mm
BEST
725mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 6.7kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 470.11mm 445mm 419mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 225mm 196mm 186.8mm
BEST
Width With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 648.86mm 611.2mm 550.5mm
BEST
Weight
3.7kg 5.1kg 4.9kg 2.8kg
BEST
Height
392.2mm 470.11mm 361.5mm
BEST
85.5mm
Depth
207.2mm
BEST
50mm 46.1mm 332.1mm
Width
522.2mm
BEST
648mm 611.2mm 550.5mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 AC
 HDMI
 DVI
 USB
BEST
 VGA
 AC
 HDMI
 DVI
 USB
BEST
 VGA
 AC
 HDMI
 DVI
 USB
BEST
 VGA
 AC
 HDMI
 DVI
 USB
Interface Adapters Included
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
 DVI-I female - HDMI male

Other Features

Maximum Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Volume Control
 Digital
 Digital
 Digital
 Digital
Product Included
Unknown - Click to provide data 1pc(s) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Placement
 Horizontal
 Horizontal
 Horizontal
 Horizontal
Dimensions With Stand
522.2 x 207.2 x 392.2 648.86 x 225 x 470.11 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback