Benq GL2760 vs Samsung S27D390

(205)
(75)
Benq GL2760
Samsung S27D390

Top Prices

PC Rush
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
2x faster response time Edit
The Benq GL2760 has a response time of 2msms, however the Samsung S27D390 is a 5msms response time PC monitor (3ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

29% narrower Edit
Benq GL2760 is 488mmmm wide. That's 137.2mm narrower than the Samsung S27D390 (625.2mmmm).
Cheaper by $189
The Benq GL2760 is $189.42 cheaper than the Samsung S27D390.
16 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Better user reviews
Based on 204 user reviews, the average review score of the Benq GL2760 is 90%, whereas the average rating of the Samsung S27D390 is 84% (based on 69 reviews).
6 Reasons For
Wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Samsung S27D390 is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° wider than the Benq GL2760 (178°°).
Marginally wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Samsung S27D390 has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°°, but the Benq GL2760 is only a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
0.019999999999996cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S27D390 has a display diagonal of 68.6cmcm, but the Benq GL2760 is only a 68.58cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.019999999999996cm smaller).
Lighter Edit
The Samsung S27D390 is a 4.3kgg weight PC monitor. That's 1.1g lighter than the Benq GL2760 (4.3kgg).
Significantly shorter Edit
The Samsung S27D390 has a height of 376.3mmmm, however the Benq GL2760 is a 715mmmm tall PC monitor (338.7mm taller).
Expert reviews are appreciably better
Based on 6 expert reviews, the Samsung S27D390 has an average review score of 74%, but the Benq GL2760 has an average rating of 60% (based on 1 review).

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
18° narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Benq GL2760 has a vertical viewing angle of 160°°, whereas the Samsung S27D390 is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider).
Narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Benq GL2760 is a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° narrower than the Samsung S27D390 (178°°).
1% smaller display diagonal Edit
The Benq GL2760 is a 68.58cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.019999999999996cm smaller than the Samsung S27D390 (68.6cmcm).
1.1g heavier Edit
The Benq GL2760 has a weight of 5.4kgg, whereas the Samsung S27D390 is a 4.3kgg weight PC monitor (1.1g lighter).
Taller Edit
Benq GL2760 is 715mmmm tall. That's 338.7mm taller than the Samsung S27D390 (376.3mmmm).
Expert review Rating is much Worse
The average expert rating of the Benq GL2760 is only 60%, whereas the average expert rating of the Samsung S27D390 is 74% (based on 6 reviews).
6 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The Samsung S27D390 is a 5msms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the Benq GL2760 (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

22% wider Edit
The Samsung S27D390 has a width of 625.2mmmm, however the Benq GL2760 is a 488mmmm wide PC monitor (137.2mm narrower).
$189 more expensive
The Samsung S27D390 is more expensive than the Benq GL2760 by $189.42.
Not as many stockists
Only 1 store sell the Samsung S27D390, however 17 shops sell the Benq GL2760. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
One month older
The Samsung S27D390 is older than the Benq GL2760 by one month.
Lower user review Score
The Samsung S27D390 has an average user rating of 84%, but the Benq GL2760 has an average user rating of 90% (based on 204 reviews).

Awards

No awards found 2 Awards
Digitaltrends.com: Recommended Product
ua.gecid.com: Original Design

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

33 months Ago 34 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data

Display

Screen Size
27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 12000000:1
BEST
 12000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Gloss
 Gloss
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 81
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.3114 x 0.3114
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
160° 178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
170° 178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.58cm 68.6cm
BEST
Display Technology
 TN
 TN
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
2ms
BEST
5ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 1
HDMI Port
1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 1

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 -1 - 20
Automatic Shut Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
OSD Language
17 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Typical Power Consumption
29W 22W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W 0.3W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 42kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 29W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 95
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 45
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 40

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
7.3kg 6kg
BEST
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 437mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 132mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 694mm
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 4.7kg
Height With Stand
641mm 453mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
215mm 209.8mm
BEST
Width With Stand
488mm
BEST
625.2mm
Weight
5.4kg 4.3kg
BEST
Height
715mm 376.3mm
BEST
Depth
132mm
BEST
79.6mm
Width
488mm
BEST
625.2mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 VGA

Technical Details

Auto Power Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Feedback