Acer H236HL vs HP Pavilion 23xw

(14)
Acer H236HL
HP Pavilion 23xw

Top Prices

Newegg UK
eBay
In stock, only 3 left!
Best Buy
Next day delivery: $20.87
In stock
eBay
In stock (20 available)
Amazon US
Out of stock
B&H Photo
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
A lot faster response time Edit
The Acer H236HL has a response time of 5msms, but the HP Pavilion 23xw is a 7msms response time PC monitor (2ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

14% lighter Edit
The Acer H236HL has a weight of 2.9kgg, however the HP Pavilion 23xw is a 3.3kgg weight PC monitor (0.4g heavier).
Cheaper by $6
The Acer H236HL costs $6 less than the HP Pavilion 23xw.
5 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
3 Reasons For
Two HDMI ports Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw has two HDMI ports, however the Acer H236HL only has one HDMI port.
Hugely lower power consumption when off Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw has a power consumption when off of 0.22WW, but the Acer H236HL is a 0.4WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.18W higher).
User reviews are better
Based on 1 user review, the HP Pavilion 23xw has an average review score of 100%, however the Acer H236HL has an average rating of 92% (based on 12 reviews).

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
One less HDMI port Edit
The Acer H236HL has one HDMI port, however the HP Pavilion 23xw only has two HDMI ports.
45% higher power consumption when off Edit
The Acer H236HL is a 0.4WW power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.18W higher than the HP Pavilion 23xw (0.22WW).
Older by over two years
The Acer H236HL is three years older than the HP Pavilion 23xw.
User review Rating is Worse
The Acer H236HL's average user score is 92%, however the HP Pavilion 23xw's is 100% (based on 1 review).
5 Reasons Against
Slower response time Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 7msms response time PC monitor. That's 2ms slower than the Acer H236HL (7msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only DVI ports Edit
The number of DVI ports on the HP Pavilion 23xw is , but the Acer H236HL only has one DVI port.
13% heavier Edit
The HP Pavilion 23xw is a 3.3kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.4g heavier than the Acer H236HL (3.3kgg).
$6 more expensive
The HP Pavilion 23xw is more expensive than the Acer H236HL by $6.
Less retailers
Only 4 stores sells the HP Pavilion 23xw, whereas 9 retailers sell the Acer H236HL. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

50 months Ago 17 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data

Display

Screen Size
23" 23"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Backlight Type
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 286.42mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 509.18mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.265 x 0.265
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
58.4cm 58.4cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms
BEST
7ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
Unknown - Click to provide data 96

Ports & Interfaces

HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
DVI-D Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1
BEST

Multimedia

Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 -2 - 25

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When Off
0.4W 0.22W
BEST
Typical Power Consumption
26W 25W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.45W
BEST
0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 32kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 27W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 90
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 70
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
BEST
 RoHS
EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
3.6kg
BEST
4kg
Height With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 403.2mm
Depth With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 150.8mm
Width With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 531.8mm
Weight
2.9kg
BEST
3.3kg
Height
403.9mm 322.2mm
Depth
172.7mm 50.6mm
Width
530.9mm 531.8mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 AC
 VGA
 AC
 VGA

Other Features

Product Included
1pc(s) Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback