AOC I2769 vs Asus MX279H vs DELL S2715H vs DELL SE2716H

(126)
(320)
(20)
(7)
AOC i2769
Asus MX279H
DELL SE2716H

Top Prices

eBay
In stock (18 available)
MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock
PC Rush
Delivery unknown
In stock
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
eBay
In stock, only 2 left!
Factory Outlet Store
In stock
No prices found
eBay
Standard delivery: $20.00
Tech For Less
In stock
SaveCentral Outlet
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
Bigger viewable width Edit
The AOC i2769 is a 597.89mmmm viewable width PC monitor, and so does the DELL S2715H. That's 0.52999999999997mm bigger than the DELL SE2716H (597.36mmmm).
Faster response time Edit
The AOC i2769 has a response time of 5msms (as does the Asus MX279H), but the DELL S2715H and the DELL SE2716H are both 6msms response time PC monitors (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more HDMI port Edit
The AOC i2769 has two HDMI ports (as do the Asus MX279H and the DELL SE2716H), however the DELL S2715H only has one HDMI port.
Cheaper by $10
The AOC i2769 costs $35.24 less than the Asus MX279H, costs $20.24 less than the DELL S2715H and costs $10.25 less than the DELL SE2716H.
Better expert reviews
Based on 12 expert reviews, the average review score of the AOC i2769 is 87%, however the average rating of the Asus MX279H is 80% (based on 35 reviews) and the average rating of the DELL SE2716H is 67% (based on 4 reviews).
A little better user reviews
Based on 114 user reviews, the average review score of the AOC i2769 is 90%, however the average rating of the Asus MX279H is 89% (based on 285 reviews), the average rating of the DELL S2715H is 88% (based on 19 reviews) and the average rating of the DELL SE2716H is 67% (based on 3 reviews).
3 Reasons For
20% faster response time Edit
The Asus MX279H has a response time of 5msms (as does the AOC i2769), however the DELL S2715H and the DELL SE2716H are both 6msms response time PC monitors (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more HDMI port Edit
The Asus MX279H is a two HDMI port PC monitor (as do the AOC i2769 and the DELL SE2716H), whereas the DELL S2715H only has one HDMI port.
Nine more awards
The Asus MX279H has 10 awards from expert review sites, but the AOC i2769 has 2 awards and the DELL SE2716H has 1 award.
5 Reasons For
Bigger viewable width Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 597.89mmmm viewable width PC monitor, and so does the AOC i2769. That's 0.52999999999997mm bigger than the DELL SE2716H (597.36mmmm).
13% lower maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 55WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 7W lower than the DELL SE2716H (62WW).
3.2g lighter Edit
The DELL S2715H has a weight of 4.9kgg, however the Asus MX279H is a 5.2kgg weight PC monitor (0.3g heavier) and the DELL SE2716H is an 8.1kgg weight PC monitor (3.2g heavier).
79.8mm shorter Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 361.5mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 79.8mm shorter than the Asus MX279H (366.2mmmm) and 4.7mm shorter than the DELL SE2716H (366.2mmmm).
2% narrower Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 611.2mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 11.4mm narrower than the Asus MX279H (616.5mmmm) and 5.3mm narrower than the DELL SE2716H (616.5mmmm).
3 Reasons For
Brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL SE2716H has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² cd/m², but the AOC i2769, the Asus MX279H and the DELL S2715H are all only 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Two HDMI ports Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the DELL SE2716H is two, and so do the AOC i2769 and the Asus MX279H, but the DELL S2715H only has one HDMI port.
Available from 5 shops
The more stores stock this PC monitor, the greater competition amongst stores to keep prices low.

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The AOC i2769 is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so do the Asus MX279H and the DELL S2715H. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the DELL SE2716H (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
Less retailers
The AOC i2769 is only stocked by 7 shops, whereas the Asus MX279H is stocked by 11 shops and the DELL SE2716H is stocked by 12 shops. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by over two years
The AOC i2769 is 19 months older than the DELL S2715H and three years older than the DELL SE2716H.
Eight less awards
The AOC i2769 has only received 2 awards, whereas the Asus MX279H has received 10 awards.
9 Reasons Against
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so do the AOC i2769 and the DELL S2715H. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the DELL SE2716H (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
Slightly heavier Edit
The Asus MX279H has a weight of 5.2kgg, whereas the DELL S2715H is a 4.9kgg weight PC monitor (0.3g lighter) and the DELL SE2716H is an 8.1kgg weight PC monitor (2.9g heavier).
Taller Edit
Asus MX279H is 441.3mmmm tall. That's 79.8mm taller than the DELL S2715H (366.2mmmm) and 75.1mm taller than the DELL SE2716H (366.2mmmm).
Wider Edit
Asus MX279H is 622.6mmmm wide. That's 11.4mm wider than the DELL S2715H (616.5mmmm) and 6.1mm wider than the DELL SE2716H (616.5mmmm).
More expensive by $35
The Asus MX279H is $35.24 more expensive than the AOC i2769, $15 more expensive than the DELL S2715H and $24.99 more expensive than the DELL SE2716H.
Fewer sellers
The Asus MX279H is only stocked by 11 stores, but the DELL SE2716H is stocked by 12 stores. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Older by over three years
The Asus MX279H is five months older than the AOC i2769, two years older than the DELL S2715H and three years older than the DELL SE2716H.
Expert review Rating is Worse
The average expert rating of the Asus MX279H is 80%, whereas the average expert rating of the AOC i2769 is 87% (based on 12 reviews).
User review Rating is moderately Worse
The average user rating of the Asus MX279H is 89%, whereas the average user rating of the AOC i2769 is 90% (based on 114 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so do the AOC i2769 and the Asus MX279H. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the DELL SE2716H (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
Slower response time Edit
The DELL S2715H has a response time of 6msms (as does the DELL SE2716H), but the AOC i2769 and the Asus MX279H are both 5msms response time PC monitors (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI port Edit
The DELL S2715H has one HDMI port, however the DELL SE2716H only has two HDMI ports.
More expensive by $20
The DELL S2715H is $20.24 more expensive than the AOC i2769 and $9.99 more expensive than the DELL SE2716H.
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by one year
The DELL S2715H is one year older than the DELL SE2716H.
User review Rating is a little Worse
The DELL S2715H's average user score is 88%, however the AOC i2769's is 90% (based on 114 reviews) and the Asus MX279H's is 89% (based on 285 reviews).
11 Reasons Against
0.52999999999997mm smaller viewable width Edit
The DELL SE2716H has a viewable width of 597.36mmmm, however the AOC i2769 and the DELL S2715H are both 597.89mmmm viewable width PC monitors (0.52999999999997mm bigger).
1ms slower response time Edit
The DELL SE2716H is a 6msms response time PC monitor, and so does the DELL S2715H. That's 1ms slower than the AOC i2769 and the Asus MX279H (6msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL SE2716H has a maximum power consumption of 62WW, but the DELL S2715H is a 55WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (7W lower).
40% heavier Edit
The DELL SE2716H is an 8.1kgg weight PC monitor. That's 2.9g heavier than the Asus MX279H (8.1kgg) and 3.2g heavier than the DELL S2715H (8.1kgg).
4.7mm taller Edit
The DELL SE2716H has a height of 366.2mmmm, however the Asus MX279H is a 441.3mmmm tall PC monitor (75.1mm taller) and the DELL S2715H is a 361.5mmmm tall PC monitor (4.7mm shorter).
36% deeper Edit
DELL SE2716H is 71.28mmmm deep. That's 153.92mm shallower than the Asus MX279H (71.28mmmm) and 25.18mm deeper than the DELL S2715H (71.28mmmm).
A bit wider Edit
The DELL SE2716H has a width of 616.5mmmm, however the Asus MX279H is a 622.6mmmm wide PC monitor (6.1mm wider) and the DELL S2715H is a 611.2mmmm wide PC monitor (5.3mm narrower).
$10 more expensive
The DELL SE2716H is more expensive than the AOC i2769 by $10.25.
Fewer awards
Whilst the DELL SE2716H has received 1 award, the AOC i2769 has received 2 awards and the Asus MX279H has received 10 awards.
Hugely Lower expert review Score
The DELL SE2716H only has an average expert rating of 67%, but the AOC i2769 has an average expert rating of 87% (based on 12 reviews) and the Asus MX279H has an average expert rating of 80% (based on 35 reviews).
Hugely Lower user review Score
The DELL SE2716H only has an average user rating of 67%, but the AOC i2769 has an average user rating of 90% (based on 114 reviews), the Asus MX279H has an average user rating of 89% (based on 285 reviews) and the DELL S2715H has an average user rating of 88% (based on 19 reviews).

Awards

2 Awards
digitallife.se: Recommended
pcelite.pl: Value for Money
10 Awards
01net.com: 5 Star
altomdata.dk: Recommended
ferra.ru: Recommended
gamezoom.net: Gold Award
hardware.info: Silver Award
hardwaremx.com: Editor's Choice
techno-labs.com: Editor's Choice
technopat.net: Editor's Choice
uk.hardware.info: Silver
xfastest.com: Innovation Award
No awards found 1 Award
Digitaltrends.com: Recommended Product

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

45 months Ago 50 months Ago 26 months Ago 15 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data No data No data

Display

Screen Size
27" 27" 27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080i
 1080p
 720i
 720p
 576i
 576p
 480i
 480p
 1080i
 1080p
 720i
 720p
 576i
 576p
 480i
 480p
BEST
 1080i
 1080p
 720i
 720p
 576i
 576p
 480i
 480p
BEST
 1080i
 1080p
 720i
 720p
 576i
 576p
 480i
 480p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
55 - 75 56 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 83 30 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
336.31mm Unknown - Click to provide data 336.31mm 336.31mm
Viewable Width
597.89mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 597.89mm
BEST
597.36mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311 0.3114 x 0.3114 0.3114 x 0.1038
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M 16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 3000:1
 3000:1
 3000:1
 3000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
68.6cm 68.6cm 68.6cm 68.6cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m² 250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
5ms
BEST
5ms
BEST
6ms 6ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 85%
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPort
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
2
BEST
2
BEST
1 2
BEST
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

Audio System
Unknown - Click to provide data Bang & Olufsen ICEpower Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 6W
BEST
18W 18W
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 2 2

Design

Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - -5 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Input Current
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.7A Unknown - Click to provide data
Current Rating
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
35W 37W 20W
BEST
29W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W 0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 36kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 55W
BEST
62W
Input Voltage
 90 - 240
BEST
 90 - 240
BEST
 90 - 240
BEST
 90 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 240
 90-240
 9
 90
 100
 100-240
 24
 240
 90-240
 9
 90
 100
 100-240
 24
 240
 90-240
 9
 90
 100
 100-240
 24
 240
 90-240
 9
 90
 100
 100-240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000 0 - 5000
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192 0 - 12192
Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90 5 - 90
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40 0 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 TCO 5.0
 RoHS
 TCO
 TCO 5.0
 RoHS
 TCO
 TCO 5.0
 RoHS
 TCO
 TCO 5.0
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
7.3kg
BEST
8kg 8.8kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 537mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 114mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 700mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
5kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 6.7kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Height With Stand
449mm Unknown - Click to provide data 445mm
BEST
457.79mm
Depth With Stand
130mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 196mm 176.15mm
Width With Stand
622mm Unknown - Click to provide data 611.2mm
BEST
616.5mm
Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 5.2kg 4.9kg
BEST
8.1kg
Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 441.3mm 361.5mm
BEST
366.2mm
Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 225.2mm
BEST
46.1mm 71.28mm
Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 622.6mm 611.2mm
BEST
616.5mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
Interface Adapters Included
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
 DVI-I female - HDMI male

Other Features

Volume Control
 Digital
 Digital
 Digital
 Digital
Product Included
1pc(s) Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Placement
 Horizontal
 Horizontal
 Horizontal
 Horizontal
Feedback