HP Pavilion 23 vs LG 23MB35

(67)
(2)
HP Pavilion 23
LG 23MB35

Top Prices

Amazon US
Delivery unknown
Amazon US
Out of stock
Overstock
eBay
In stock, only 5 left!
Adorama
Out of stock

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
Marginally bigger viewable height Edit
The HP Pavilion 23 has a viewable height of 286.42mmmm, however the LG 23MB35 is only a 286.41mmmm viewable height PC monitor (0.0099999999999909mm smaller).
Bigger viewable width Edit
The HP Pavilion 23 is a 509.18mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 0.0099999999999909mm bigger than the LG 23MB35 (509.17mmmm).
Lower power consumption when off Edit
The HP Pavilion 23 is a 0.22WW power consumption when off PC monitor. That's 0.08W lower than the LG 23MB35 (0.3WW).
7% lower annual energy consumption Edit
The HP Pavilion 23 is a 32kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 2kWh lower than the LG 23MB35 (34kWhkWh).
23% lower average power consumption Edit
The HP Pavilion 23 is a 22WW average power consumption PC monitor. That's 5W lower than the LG 23MB35 (27WW).
21% lighter Edit
The HP Pavilion 23 has a weight of 3.5kgg, however the LG 23MB35 is a 4.2kgg weight PC monitor (0.7g heavier).
4% narrower Edit
The HP Pavilion 23 is a 532mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 16mm narrower than the LG 23MB35 (548mmmm).
6 Reasons For
Faster response time Edit
The LG 23MB35 is a 5msms response time PC monitor. That's 2ms faster than the HP Pavilion 23 (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Shorter Edit
LG 23MB35 is 335mmmm tall, but the HP Pavilion 23 is a 404mmmm tall PC monitor (69mm taller).
$81 cheaper
The LG 23MB35 is $81 cheaper than the HP Pavilion 23.
Available from 2 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Expert reviews are appreciably better
Based on 1 expert review, the LG 23MB35 has an average review score of 80%, whereas the HP Pavilion 23 has an average rating of 70% (based on 26 reviews).
User reviews are significantly better
Based on 1 user review, the LG 23MB35 has an average review score of 100%, whereas the HP Pavilion 23 has an average rating of 67% (based on 41 reviews).

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
2ms slower response time Edit
The HP Pavilion 23 has a response time of 7msms, but the LG 23MB35 is a 5msms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

69mm taller Edit
The HP Pavilion 23 is a 404mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 69mm taller than the LG 23MB35 (335mmmm).
More expensive by $81
The HP Pavilion 23 is $81 more expensive than the LG 23MB35.
Less retailers
The HP Pavilion 23 is only stocked by 1 seller, whereas the LG 23MB35 is stocked by 3 retailers. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Expert review Rating is much Worse
The HP Pavilion 23's average expert score is only 70%, however the LG 23MB35's is 80% (based on 1 review).
User review Rating is vastly Worse
The HP Pavilion 23's average user score is only 67%, however the LG 23MB35's is 100% (based on 1 review).
8 Reasons Against
1% smaller viewable height Edit
The LG 23MB35 is a 286.41mmmm viewable height PC monitor. That's 0.0099999999999909mm smaller than the HP Pavilion 23 (286.41mmmm).
Slightly smaller viewable width Edit
The LG 23MB35 has a viewable width of 509.17mmmm, but the HP Pavilion 23 is a 509.18mmmm viewable width PC monitor (0.0099999999999909mm bigger).
A lot higher power consumption when off Edit
The LG 23MB35 has a power consumption when off of 0.3WW, however the HP Pavilion 23 is a 0.22WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.08W lower).
2kWh higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 23MB35 has an annual energy consumption of 34kWhkWh, however the HP Pavilion 23 is a 32kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (2kWh lower).
5W higher average power consumption Edit
The LG 23MB35 has an average power consumption of 27WW, whereas the HP Pavilion 23 is a 22WW average power consumption PC monitor (5W lower).
0.7g heavier Edit
The LG 23MB35 is a 4.2kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.7g heavier than the HP Pavilion 23 (4.2kgg).
16mm wider Edit
LG 23MB35 is 548mmmm wide, but the HP Pavilion 23 is a 532mmmm wide PC monitor (16mm narrower).
Three months older
The LG 23MB35 is older than the HP Pavilion 23 by three months.

Awards

3 Awards
computershopper.com: Good For Families
toptenreviews.com: Bronze
zeden.net: Approved
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

33 months Ago 36 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 25.74
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.40
Total running cost $ 27.14
Purchase price $ 148.99
Total cost of ownership $ 176.13
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.18T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.18 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
23" 23"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 10000000:1
BEST
 10000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LCD
BEST
 LED
 LCD
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 83
Viewable Height
286.42mm
BEST
286.41mm
Viewable Width
509.18mm
BEST
509.17mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
0 - 76 56 - 75
Horizontal Scan Range
0 - 80 30 - 83
Pixel Pitch
0.265 x 0.265 0.265 x 0.265
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
58.4cm
BEST
58.42cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
7ms 5ms
BEST
Color Gamut
72% Unknown - Click to provide data
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
96 Unknown - Click to provide data

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
HDMI Port
1 1
DVI-D Port
1 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 1W
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2

Design

Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver

Performance

Mean Time Between Failures
Unknown - Click to provide data 50,000h

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 365
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 110mm
Tilt Angle
-5 - 25 20 - 5
On Screen Display Language
 CHI (SIMPL)
 GRE
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 KOR
 CHI (SIMPL)
 GRE
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 KOR
BEST

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Power Consumption When Off
0.22W
BEST
0.3W
Typical Power Consumption
30W 21W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
32kWh
BEST
34kWh
Average Power Consumption
22W
BEST
27W
Maximum Power Consumption
27W 27W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
 50
 60
 50/60
 47/63
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-240
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-240
 9
 90

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Storage Range
20 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
20 - 70 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
5 - 35 Unknown - Click to provide data

Certificates

Compliance Industry Standard
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 6.4kg
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 413mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 202mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 626mm
Weight With Stand
4kg 4.5kg
BEST
Height With Stand
403.2mm 367mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
150.8mm
BEST
246mm
Width With Stand
531.8mm
BEST
548mm
Weight
3.5kg
BEST
4.2kg
Height
404mm 335mm
BEST
Depth
171mm
BEST
61mm
Width
532mm
BEST
548mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 AC
 DVI
 VGA
 AC
 DVI

Technical Details

Country of Origin
 China
 China
Feedback