Acer XB241H vs HP Z2

(4)
Acer XB241H
HP Z2

Top Prices

Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
eBay
Standard delivery: $9.98
Amazon US
Out of stock
B&H Photo
In stock
Antonline
Delivery unknown
In stock, only 5 left!
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
20mm higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The Acer XB241H has a maximum height adjustment of 150mmmm, whereas the HP Z2 is only a 130mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (20mm lower).
3.8g lighter Edit
The Acer XB241H has a weight of 3.9kgg, but the HP Z2 is a 7.7kgg weight PC monitor (3.8g heavier).
Shorter Edit
The Acer XB241H has a height of 335.2mmmm. That's 28.9mm shorter than the HP Z2 (364.1mmmm).
9% narrower Edit
The Acer XB241H has a width of 566.4mmmm. That's 47.9mm narrower than the HP Z2 (614.3mmmm).
1 shops are selling it
The more sellers stock the product, the greater competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.
5 Reasons For
12% bigger screen size Edit
The HP Z2 is a 27"" PC monitor. That's 3" bigger than the Acer XB241H (27""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

11% bigger display diagonal Edit
The HP Z2 is a 68.47cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 7.47cm bigger than the Acer XB241H (68.47cmcm).
Two DisplayPorts Edit
The HP Z2 has two DisplayPorts, however the Acer XB241H only has one DisplayPort.
13% shallower Edit
The HP Z2 has a depth of 53.9mmmm, however the Acer XB241H is a 60.9mmmm deep PC monitor (7mm deeper).
Cheaper by $78
The HP Z2 costs $77.99 less than the Acer XB241H.

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
Smaller screen size Edit
The Acer XB241H is a 24"" PC monitor. That's 3" smaller than the HP Z2 (27""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller display diagonal Edit
The Acer XB241H is a 61cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 7.47cm smaller than the HP Z2 (68.47cmcm).
Only one DisplayPort Edit
The number of DisplayPorts on the Acer XB241H is one, but the HP Z2 only has two DisplayPorts.
Deeper Edit
Acer XB241H is 60.9mmmm deep, but the HP Z2 is a 53.9mmmm deep PC monitor (7mm shallower).
More expensive by $78
The Acer XB241H is $77.99 more expensive than the HP Z2.
6 Reasons Against
Lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The HP Z2 has a maximum height adjustment of 130mmmm, but the Acer XB241H is a 150mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (20mm higher).
3.8g heavier Edit
The HP Z2 has a weight of 7.7kgg, however the Acer XB241H is a 3.9kgg weight PC monitor (3.8g lighter).
Taller Edit
The HP Z2 is a 364.1mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 28.9mm taller than the Acer XB241H (364.1mmmm).
8% wider Edit
The HP Z2 is a 614.3mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 47.9mm wider than the Acer XB241H (614.3mmmm).
Less retailers
The HP Z2 is only stocked by 8 shops, whereas the Acer XB241H is stocked by 9 stores. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by ten months
The HP Z2 is ten months older than the Acer XB241H.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

9 months Ago 20 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data

Display

Screen Size
24" 27"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 5000000:1
 5000000:1
BEST
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1366 х 768
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1366 х 768
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1440p
 1440p
BEST
HD Type
 2K Ultra HD
 2K Ultra HD
BEST
Viewable Size Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 335.66mm
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 596.74mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 60
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 90
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.2331 x 0.2331
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
61cm 68.47cm
BEST
Display Technology
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
Display Brightness
350 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms 14ms
BEST
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 99%
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DisplayPort
1 2
BEST
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 4
HDMI Port
1 1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Mini DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 4
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
150mm
BEST
130mm
Tilt Angle
-5 - 35 -5 - 22
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption When Off
0.45W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
28W
BEST
37W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 55kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 83W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192
Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 MPR II
BEST
 MPR II
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Weight With Stand
6.3kg
BEST
7.7kg
Height With Stand
542mm 533.7mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
268mm 18.2mm
BEST
Width With Stand
566.9mm
BEST
614.3mm
Weight
3.9kg
BEST
7.7kg
Height
335.2mm
BEST
364.1mm
Depth
60.9mm 53.9mm
BEST
Width
566.4mm
BEST
614.3mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
Feedback