Benq RL2755 vs Samsung S24E650DW

(123)
Benq RL2755
Samsung S24E650DW

Top Prices

Newegg UK
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Overstock

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 27"" PC monitor. That's 3" bigger than the Samsung S24E650DW (24""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

12.15mm bigger viewable height Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a viewable height of 336.15mmmm, but the Samsung S24E650DW is only a 324mmmm viewable height PC monitor (12.15mm smaller).
14% bigger viewable width Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 597.6mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 79.2mm bigger than the Samsung S24E650DW (518.4mmmm).
Brighter display brightness Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Samsung S24E650DW (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
Significantly faster response time Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a response time of 1msms, whereas the Samsung S24E650DW is a 4msms response time PC monitor (3ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Cheaper by $33
The Benq RL2755 costs $225.99, whereas the Samsung S24E650DW is $259.00.
4 Reasons For
Wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Samsung S24E650DW has a vertical viewing angle of 178°°, but the Benq RL2755 is only a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
Wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Samsung S24E650DW is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° wider than the Benq RL2755 (178°°).
1.4g lighter Edit
The Samsung S24E650DW has a weight of 4.1kgg, but the Benq RL2755 is a 5.5kgg weight PC monitor (1.4g heavier).
2 shops are selling it
The more sellers stock the product, the greater competition amongst sellers to keep prices low.

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
Narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a vertical viewing angle of 160°°, but the Samsung S24E650DW is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider).
5% narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° narrower than the Samsung S24E650DW (178°°).
A lot heavier Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a weight of 5.5kgg, but the Samsung S24E650DW is a 4.1kgg weight PC monitor (1.4g lighter).
Not as many stockists
The Benq RL2755 is only stocked by 9 stores, however the Samsung S24E650DW is stocked by 11 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by three months
The Benq RL2755 is three months older than the Samsung S24E650DW.
6 Reasons Against
Smaller screen size Edit
The Samsung S24E650DW is a 24"" PC monitor. That's 3" smaller than the Benq RL2755 (24""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Marginally smaller viewable height Edit
The Samsung S24E650DW has a viewable height of 324mmmm, but the Benq RL2755 is a 336.15mmmm viewable height PC monitor (12.15mm bigger).
16% smaller viewable width Edit
The Samsung S24E650DW is a 518.4mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 79.2mm smaller than the Benq RL2755 (518.4mmmm).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The Samsung S24E650DW is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Benq RL2755 (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
3ms slower response time Edit
The Samsung S24E650DW has a response time of 4msms, whereas the Benq RL2755 is a 1msms response time PC monitor (3ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

More expensive by $33
The Samsung S24E650DW is $33.01 more expensive than the Benq RL2755.

Awards

2 Awards
hardwareheaven.com: Recommended
kitguru.net: Worth Considering
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

24 months Ago 20 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 30.65
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.40
Total running cost $ 32.05
Purchase price $ 259.00
Total cost of ownership $ 291.05
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.21T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.21 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27"
BEST
24"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
BEST
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 12000000:1
BEST
 12000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
BEST
Video Mode
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
BEST
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
336.15mm
BEST
324mm
Viewable Width
597.6mm
BEST
518.4mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.27 x 0.27
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
160° 178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
170° 178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Technology
 TN
 TN
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms
BEST
4ms
Color Gamut
72% 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:10
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Brightness (min)
Unknown - Click to provide data 200
Maximum Refresh Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data 60Hz

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
HDMI Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
4W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -1 - 95
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 130mm
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 -3 - 25
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45
OSD Language
17 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.01W
Typical Power Consumption
24.21W
BEST
25W
Standby Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Input Voltage
 90 - 264
BEST
 90 - 264
AC Input Voltage
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
Power Consumption (DPMS)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 40

Certificates

Electromagnetic Compatibility
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 C-Tick
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 C-Tick

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 7.3kg
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 188mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 433mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 628mm
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 5.8kg
Height With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 387.3mm
Depth With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 224mm
Width With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 554.8mm
Weight
5.5kg 4.1kg
BEST
Height
478mm 359.4mm
Depth
213mm 55.1mm
Width
639mm 554.8mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 HDMI
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 USB
 VGA

Technical Details

Samsung Magic Function
Unknown - Click to provide data MagicBright, MagicUpscale
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 518.4 x 324
Feedback