HP Pavilion 25xw vs LG 24MP48HQ-P

HP Pavilion 25xw
LG 24MP48HQ-P

Top Prices

Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock
Amazon US
Out of stock
MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock
B&H Photo
Delivery unknown
In stock
BuyDig
Delivery unknown
In stock, only 2 left!
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock (173 available)

Reasons For

2 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The HP Pavilion 25xw is a 25"" PC monitor. That's 1.2" bigger than the LG 24MP48HQ-P (23.8""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

One more HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the HP Pavilion 25xw is two, but the LG 24MP48HQ-P only has one HDMI port.
5 Reasons For
A lot faster response time Edit
The LG 24MP48HQ-P has a response time of 5msms, but the HP Pavilion 25xw is a 7msms response time PC monitor (2ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

A lot lighter Edit
The LG 24MP48HQ-P has a weight of 2.8kgg, however the HP Pavilion 25xw is a 3.8kgg weight PC monitor (1g heavier).
Cheaper by $51
The LG 24MP48HQ-P costs $50.99 less than the HP Pavilion 25xw.
1 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Vastly better user reviews
The average user review score of the LG 24MP48HQ-P is 100% based on 1 review, however the average rating of the HP Pavilion 25xw is 60% (based on 1 review).

Reasons Against

6 Reasons Against
2ms slower response time Edit
The HP Pavilion 25xw has a response time of 7msms, whereas the LG 24MP48HQ-P is a 5msms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

1g heavier Edit
The HP Pavilion 25xw has a weight of 3.8kgg, but the LG 24MP48HQ-P is a 2.8kgg weight PC monitor (1g lighter).
More expensive by $51
The HP Pavilion 25xw is $50.99 more expensive than the LG 24MP48HQ-P.
Not as many stockists
The HP Pavilion 25xw is only stocked by 3 shops, however the LG 24MP48HQ-P is stocked by 4 shops. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by six months
The HP Pavilion 25xw is six months older than the LG 24MP48HQ-P.
User review Rating is hugely Worse
The HP Pavilion 25xw only has an average user score of 60%, but the LG 24MP48HQ-P has an average user rating of 100% (based on 1 review).
2 Reasons Against
6% smaller screen size Edit
The LG 24MP48HQ-P is a 23.8"" PC monitor. That's 1.2" smaller than the HP Pavilion 25xw (23.8""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

One less HDMI port Edit
The LG 24MP48HQ-P has one HDMI port, however the HP Pavilion 25xw only has two HDMI ports.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

17 months Ago 11 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 34.33
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 36.66
Purchase price $ 179.99
Total cost of ownership $ 216.65
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.24T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.24 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
6
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Display

Screen Size
25"
BEST
23.8"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 10000000:1
BEST
 10000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Viewable Height
308.64mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
552.96mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.288 x 0.286 0.2745 x 0.2745
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
7ms 5ms
BEST
Color Gamut
72% 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
88.1 Unknown - Click to provide data
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

HDMI Port
2
BEST
1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-2 - 25 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Typical Power Consumption
28W 22W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 103kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
30W Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Storage Range
20 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
20 - 70 Unknown - Click to provide data
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
5 - 35 Unknown - Click to provide data

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 4.1kg
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 399mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 114.3mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 620mm
Weight With Stand
4.8kg 2.8kg
BEST
Height With Stand
424.9mm 188mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
164.1mm
BEST
409mm
Width With Stand
576.5mm 548.64mm
BEST
Weight
3.8kg 2.8kg
BEST
Height
434.9mm 63.5mm
Depth
50.6mm 330mm
Width
576.5mm 548.64mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 AC
 HDMI
 VGA
 AC
 HDMI
Feedback