Benq RL2755 vs Samsung S24E650PL

(123)
Benq RL2755
Samsung S24E650PL

Top Prices

Newegg UK
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Overstock
eBay
Factory Outlet Store
In stock
Antonline
Delivery unknown
In stock (217 available)

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
3.4" bigger screen size Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 27"" PC monitor. That's 3.4" bigger than the Samsung S24E650PL (23.6""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Samsung S24E650PL (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
3x faster response time Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a response time of 1msms, however the Samsung S24E650PL is a 4msms response time PC monitor (3ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more HDMI port Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a two HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the Samsung S24E650PL only has one HDMI port.
8 Reasons For
11% wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL has a vertical viewing angle of 178°°, however the Benq RL2755 is only a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
5% wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° wider than the Benq RL2755 (178°°).
A lot lighter Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL has a weight of 4kgg, however the Benq RL2755 is a 5.5kgg weight PC monitor (1.5g heavier).
45% shorter Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL is a 330.5mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 147.5mm shorter than the Benq RL2755 (330.5mmmm).
84.4mm narrower Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL is a 554.6mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 84.4mm narrower than the Benq RL2755 (554.6mmmm).
Cheaper by $80
The Samsung S24E650PL costs $80 less than the Benq RL2755.
4 shops are selling it
A greater number of shops increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Better user reviews
The average user review score of the Samsung S24E650PL is 100% based on 2 reviews, however the average rating of the Benq RL2755 is 94% (based on 107 reviews).

Reasons Against

9 Reasons Against
18° narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a vertical viewing angle of 160°°, whereas the Samsung S24E650PL is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° wider).
5% narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Benq RL2755 is a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° narrower than the Samsung S24E650PL (178°°).
A lot heavier Edit
The Benq RL2755 has a weight of 5.5kgg, whereas the Samsung S24E650PL is a 4kgg weight PC monitor (1.5g lighter).
31% taller Edit
Benq RL2755 is 478mmmm tall. That's 147.5mm taller than the Samsung S24E650PL (330.5mmmm).
Wider Edit
Benq RL2755 is 639mmmm wide. That's 84.4mm wider than the Samsung S24E650PL (554.6mmmm).
More expensive by $80
The Benq RL2755 is $80 more expensive than the Samsung S24E650PL.
Fewer sellers
The Benq RL2755 is only stocked by 8 shops, but the Samsung S24E650PL is stocked by 12 sellers. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Older by three months
The Benq RL2755 is three months older than the Samsung S24E650PL.
User review Rating is Worse
The average user rating of the Benq RL2755 is 94%, whereas the average user rating of the Samsung S24E650PL is 100% (based on 2 reviews).
5 Reasons Against
15% smaller screen size Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL is a 23.6"" PC monitor. That's 3.4" smaller than the Benq RL2755 (23.6""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Benq RL2755 (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
Hugely slower response time Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL has a response time of 4msms, but the Benq RL2755 is a 1msms response time PC monitor (3ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI port Edit
The Samsung S24E650PL has one HDMI port, however the Benq RL2755 only has two HDMI ports.
One less DVI port Edit
The number of DVI ports on the Samsung S24E650PL is , but the Benq RL2755 only has one DVI port.

Awards

2 Awards
hardwareheaven.com: Recommended
kitguru.net: Worth Considering
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

24 months Ago 20 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 30.65
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.40
Total running cost $ 32.05
Purchase price $ 145.99
Total cost of ownership $ 178.04
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.21T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.21 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27"
BEST
23.6"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 12000000:1
BEST
 12000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Video Mode
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
336.15mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
597.6mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.2715 x 0.2715
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
160° 178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
170° 178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 59.94cm
Display Technology
 TN
 TN
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms
BEST
4ms
Color Gamut
72% 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Brightness (min)
Unknown - Click to provide data 200
Maximum Refresh Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data 60Hz

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
HDMI Port
2
BEST
1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1
BEST

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
4W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Recyclable Material Percentage
Unknown - Click to provide data 30%
Case Colour
 Black
 Black
Heavy Metal Free Design
 Hg (mercury)
 Hg (mercury)

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -1 - 95
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 130mm
Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 -3 - 25
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45
OSD Language
17 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Typical Power Consumption
24.21W
BEST
25W
Standby Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 36kWh
Input Voltage
 90 - 264
BEST
 90 - 264
AC Input Voltage
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-264
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
Electromagnetic Compatibility
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 C-Tick
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 C-Tick

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 7.1kg
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 406mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 185mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 632mm
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 5.6kg
Height With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 487.3mm
Depth With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 224mm
Width With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 554.6mm
Weight
5.5kg 4kg
BEST
Height
478mm 330.5mm
BEST
Depth
213mm
BEST
55.4mm
Width
639mm 554.6mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 HDMI
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 USB
 VGA

Technical Details

Samsung Magic Function
Unknown - Click to provide data MagicBright, MagicUpscale
Sleep Timer
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data 521.28 x 293.22
Feedback