DELL U2415 vs DELL UltraSharp 24 vs Samsung S24E650DW

(169)
(169)
DELL U2415
DELL UltraSharp 24
Samsung S24E650DW

Top Prices

B&H Photo
In stock
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock
PC Rush
Delivery unknown
In stock (150 available)
Tech For Less
In stock
eBay
In stock, only 3 left!
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
B&H Photo
In stock
Overstock
eBay
In stock (127 available)

Reasons For

9 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 24.1"" PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 0.1" bigger than the Samsung S24E650DW (24""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

17% brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Samsung S24E650DW (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
21% larger color gamut Edit
The DELL U2415 has a color gamut of 91%%, however the Samsung S24E650DW is only a 72%% color gamut PC monitor (19% smaller).
Two DisplayPorts Edit
The DELL U2415 has two DisplayPorts, however the Samsung S24E650DW only has one DisplayPort.
One more USB 3.0 port Edit
The DELL U2415 is a six USB 3.0 port PC monitor, whereas the DELL UltraSharp 24 only has five USB 3.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 3.0 ports on the Samsung S24E650DW. It is possible that it does not have any USB 3.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Four more USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The DELL U2415 is a six USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the DELL UltraSharp 24 only has five USB Type-A downstream ports and the Samsung S24E650DW only has two USB Type-A downstream ports.
Shorter Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 350.6mmmm tall PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 8.8mm shorter than the Samsung S24E650DW (359.4mmmm).
21% shallower Edit
The DELL U2415 has a depth of 45.7mmmm (as does the DELL UltraSharp 24), however the Samsung S24E650DW is a 55.1mmmm deep PC monitor (9.4mm deeper).
5% narrower Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 532.2mmmm wide PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 22.6mm narrower than the Samsung S24E650DW (554.8mmmm).
8 Reasons For
1% bigger screen size Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 24.1"" PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 0.1" bigger than the Samsung S24E650DW (24""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Brighter display brightness Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Samsung S24E650DW (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
3% shorter Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a height of 350.6mmmm, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 8.8mm shorter than the Samsung S24E650DW (359.4mmmm).
Shallower Edit
DELL UltraSharp 24 is 45.7mmmm deep (as does the DELL U2415), but the Samsung S24E650DW is a 55.1mmmm deep PC monitor (9.4mm deeper).
Narrower Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a width of 532.2mmmm, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 22.6mm narrower than the Samsung S24E650DW (554.8mmmm).
Cheaper by $23
The DELL UltraSharp 24 costs $215.97, whereas the DELL U2415 is $239.00 and the Samsung S24E650DW is $259.00.
12 shops are selling it
The more shops stock the product, the greater competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
$1.52 cheaper to run
Over five years the DELL UltraSharp 24 is $1.52 cheaper to run than the Samsung S24E650DW. Read more
3 Reasons For
Faster response time Edit
The Samsung S24E650DW is a 4msms response time PC monitor. That's 2ms faster than the DELL U2415 (4msms) and 4ms faster than the DELL UltraSharp 24 (4msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The Samsung S24E650DW is a 130mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 15mm higher than the DELL U2415 (130mmmm).
Lighter Edit
The Samsung S24E650DW is a 4.1kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.2g lighter than the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 (4.1kgg).

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
2ms slower response time Edit
The DELL U2415 has a response time of 6msms, but the DELL UltraSharp 24 is an 8msms response time PC monitor (2ms slower) and the Samsung S24E650DW is a 4msms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less DVI port Edit
The number of DVI ports on the DELL U2415 is , but the Samsung S24E650DW only has one DVI port. Read more

We do not know the number of DVI ports on the DELL UltraSharp 24. It is possible that it does not have any DVI ports.

Lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The DELL U2415 has a maximum height adjustment of 115mmmm, but the Samsung S24E650DW is a 130mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (15mm higher).
0.2g heavier Edit
The DELL U2415 has a weight of 4.3kgg (as does the DELL UltraSharp 24), however the Samsung S24E650DW is a 4.1kgg weight PC monitor (0.2g lighter).
More expensive by $23
The DELL U2415 is $23.03 more expensive than the DELL UltraSharp 24.
Less retailers
The DELL U2415 is only stocked by 4 retailers, whereas the DELL UltraSharp 24 is stocked by 16 sellers and the Samsung S24E650DW is stocked by 15 shops. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Older by six months
The DELL U2415 is six months older than the Samsung S24E650DW. The DELL U2415 is the same age as the DELL UltraSharp 24.
6 Reasons Against
A lot slower response time Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a response time of 8msms, whereas the DELL U2415 is a 6msms response time PC monitor (2ms faster) and the Samsung S24E650DW is a 4msms response time PC monitor (4ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one DisplayPort Edit
The number of DisplayPorts on the DELL UltraSharp 24 is one, and so does the Samsung S24E650DW, but the DELL U2415 only has two DisplayPorts.
One less USB 3.0 port Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has five USB 3.0 ports, however the DELL U2415 only has six USB 3.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 3.0 ports on the Samsung S24E650DW. It is possible that it does not have any USB 3.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

One less USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has five USB Type-A downstream ports, however the DELL U2415 only has six USB Type-A downstream ports.
Moderately heavier Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a weight of 4.3kgg (as does the DELL U2415), but the Samsung S24E650DW is a 4.1kgg weight PC monitor (0.2g lighter).
Older by six months
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is six months older than the Samsung S24E650DW. The DELL UltraSharp 24 is the same age as the DELL U2415.
11 Reasons Against
Slightly smaller screen size Edit
The Samsung S24E650DW has a screen size of 24"", however the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 24.1"" PC monitors (0.1" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Samsung S24E650DW has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² cd/m², however the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (50 cd/m² brighter).
27% smaller color gamut Edit
The Samsung S24E650DW is a 72%% color gamut PC monitor. That's 19% smaller than the DELL U2415 (72%%).
One less DisplayPort Edit
The Samsung S24E650DW has one DisplayPort (as does the DELL UltraSharp 24), however the DELL U2415 only has two DisplayPorts.
Only two USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The Samsung S24E650DW is a two USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2415 only has six USB Type-A downstream ports and the DELL UltraSharp 24 only has five USB Type-A downstream ports.
Marginally taller Edit
The Samsung S24E650DW is a 359.4mmmm tall PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 350.6mmmm tall PC monitors (8.8mm shorter).
18% deeper Edit
The Samsung S24E650DW has a depth of 55.1mmmm. That's 9.4mm deeper than the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 (55.1mmmm).
22.6mm wider Edit
The Samsung S24E650DW is a 554.8mmmm wide PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 532.2mmmm wide PC monitors (22.6mm narrower).
$43 more expensive
The Samsung S24E650DW is more expensive than the DELL U2415 by $20 and more expensive than the DELL UltraSharp 24 by $43.03.
Less retailers
Only 15 sellers sells the Samsung S24E650DW, whereas 16 stores sell the DELL UltraSharp 24. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
5% higher running costs over five years
Over five years the Samsung S24E650DW costs $32.05 to run which is $1.52 more to run than the DELL UltraSharp 24. Show assumptions.

Awards

1 Award
pcmagazine.ru: 5 Star
1 Award
pcmagazine.ru: 5 Star
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

27 months Ago 27 months Ago 20 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 28.20
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 30.53
Purchase price $ 215.97
Total cost of ownership $ 246.50
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 30.65
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.40
Total running cost $ 32.05
Purchase price $ 259.00
Total cost of ownership $ 291.05
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.2T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.21T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.21 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
24.1"
BEST
24.1"
BEST
24"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1200
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 2000000:1
BEST
 2000000:1
BEST
 2000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
BEST
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
BEST
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
HD Type
 Full HD
BEST
 Full HD
BEST
 Full HD
Viewable Size Diagonal
611mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
324mm 324mm 324mm
Viewable Width
518.4mm 518.4mm 518.4mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 16:10
 16:10
Pixel Pitch
0.27 x 0.27 0.27 x 0.27 0.27 x 0.27
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
61.1cm 61.1cm Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m²
Response Time
6ms 8ms 4ms
BEST
Color Gamut
91%
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:10
 16:10
 16:10
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Brightness (min)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 200
Maximum Refresh Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 60Hz

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPort
2
BEST
1 1
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2
USB 3.0 Port
6
BEST
5 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
2 2 Unknown - Click to provide data
Mini DisplayPort
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
BEST
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
6
BEST
5 2
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
Upstream Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Coloured Feet
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver
Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -1 - 95
Maximum Height Adjustment
115mm Unknown - Click to provide data 130mm
BEST
Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -21 - 5 -3 - 25
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -45 - 45

Power

Input Current
1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.01W
Typical Power Consumption
23W
BEST
23W
BEST
25W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Maximum Power Consumption
75W 75W Unknown - Click to provide data
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
Power Consumption (DPMS)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 90 5 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 10 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 -20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
0 - 40 0 - 40 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
Electromagnetic Compatibility
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 C-Tick
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 C-Tick
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 C-Tick
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8.4kg 8.4kg 7.3kg
BEST
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 188mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 433mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 628mm
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5.8kg
Height With Stand
517.9mm 517.9mm 387.3mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
205mm
BEST
205mm
BEST
224mm
Width With Stand
532.2mm
BEST
532.2mm
BEST
554.8mm
Weight
4.3kg 4.3kg 4.1kg
BEST
Height
350.6mm
BEST
350.6mm
BEST
359.4mm
Depth
45.7mm
BEST
45.7mm
BEST
55.1mm
Width
532.2mm
BEST
532.2mm
BEST
554.8mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 USB
 AC
 DisplayPort
 VGA

Technical Details

Samsung Magic Function
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data MagicBright, MagicUpscale
Sleep Timer
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Active Display Area (W X H)
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 518.4 x 324
Feedback