HP ProDisplay P232 vs Lenovo X24

HP ProDisplay P232

Top Prices

No prices found

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
40% faster response time Edit
The HP ProDisplay P232 is a 5msms response time PC monitor. That's 2ms faster than the Lenovo X24 (7msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

9% lighter Edit
The HP ProDisplay P232 is a 3.6kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.3g lighter than the Lenovo X24 (3.9kgg).
194.6mm shorter Edit
HP ProDisplay P232 is 346.3mmmm tall, but the Lenovo X24 is a 540.9mmmm tall PC monitor (194.6mm taller).
$160 cheaper
The HP ProDisplay P232 is $160 cheaper than the Lenovo X24.
9 Reasons For
Bigger screen size Edit
The Lenovo X24 is a 23.8"" PC monitor. That's 0.8" bigger than the HP ProDisplay P232 (23.8""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Marginally bigger viewable height Edit
The Lenovo X24 has a viewable height of 296.5mmmm, whereas the HP ProDisplay P232 is only a 286.4mmmm viewable height PC monitor (10.1mm smaller).
Bigger viewable width Edit
The Lenovo X24 is a 527mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 17.8mm bigger than the HP ProDisplay P232 (527mmmm).
18° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Lenovo X24 has a vertical viewing angle of 178°°, whereas the HP ProDisplay P232 is only a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
Wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Lenovo X24 is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor. That's 8° wider than the HP ProDisplay P232 (178°°).
4% bigger display diagonal Edit
The Lenovo X24 is a 60.45cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 2.03cm bigger than the HP ProDisplay P232 (60.45cmcm).
Two DisplayPorts Edit
The Lenovo X24 is a two DisplayPort PC monitor, whereas the HP ProDisplay P232 only has one DisplayPort.
3W lower maximum power consumption Edit
The Lenovo X24 is a 27WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 3W lower than the HP ProDisplay P232 (27WW).
33% narrower Edit
Lenovo X24 is 412.8mmmm wide. That's 135.8mm narrower than the HP ProDisplay P232 (412.8mmmm).

Reasons Against

9 Reasons Against
0.8" smaller screen size Edit
The HP ProDisplay P232 has a screen size of 23"", whereas the Lenovo X24 is a 23.8"" PC monitor (0.8" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller viewable height Edit
The HP ProDisplay P232 is a 286.4mmmm viewable height PC monitor. That's 10.1mm smaller than the Lenovo X24 (296.5mmmm).
17.8mm smaller viewable width Edit
The HP ProDisplay P232 has a viewable width of 509.2mmmm, but the Lenovo X24 is a 527mmmm viewable width PC monitor (17.8mm bigger).
18° narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The HP ProDisplay P232 is a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° narrower than the Lenovo X24 (178°°).
8° narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The HP ProDisplay P232 has a horizontal viewing angle of 170°°, whereas the Lenovo X24 is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° wider).
Slightly smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP ProDisplay P232 has a display diagonal of 58.42cmcm, whereas the Lenovo X24 is a 60.45cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (2.03cm bigger).
One less DisplayPort Edit
The HP ProDisplay P232 is a one DisplayPort PC monitor, whereas the Lenovo X24 only has two DisplayPorts.
A bit higher maximum power consumption Edit
The HP ProDisplay P232 has a maximum power consumption of 30WW, whereas the Lenovo X24 is a 27WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (3W lower).
Wider Edit
HP ProDisplay P232 is 548.6mmmm wide, but the Lenovo X24 is a 412.8mmmm wide PC monitor (135.8mm narrower).
6 Reasons Against
2ms slower response time Edit
The Lenovo X24 has a response time of 7msms, however the HP ProDisplay P232 is a 5msms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

0.3g heavier Edit
The Lenovo X24 has a weight of 3.9kgg, whereas the HP ProDisplay P232 is a 3.6kgg weight PC monitor (0.3g lighter).
Taller Edit
Lenovo X24 is 540.9mmmm tall. That's 194.6mm taller than the HP ProDisplay P232 (540.9mmmm).
More expensive by $160
The Lenovo X24 is $160 more expensive than the HP ProDisplay P232.
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by one month
The Lenovo X24 is one month older than the HP ProDisplay P232.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

20 months Ago 20 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data

Display

Screen Size
23" 23.8"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 5000000:1
BEST
 5000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1366 х 768
 720 x 400
 640 x 350
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 768 (WXGA)
 1280 x 768
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1366 х 768
 720 x 400
 640 x 350
BEST
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
Response Time in 3D
Unknown - Click to provide data 7
Viewable Size Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 604.5mm
Viewable Height
286.4mm 296.5mm
BEST
Viewable Width
509.2mm 527mm
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
24 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.265 x 0.265 0.2745 x 0.2745
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
160° 178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
170° 178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
58.42cm 60.45cm
BEST
Display Technology
 TN
 TN
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
5ms
BEST
7ms
Color Gamut
72% 72%
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
96 Unknown - Click to provide data

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPort
1 2
BEST
HDMI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-5 - 22 -5 - 22
OSD Language
10 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
Typical Power Consumption
24W 24W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W
Maximum Power Consumption
30W 27W
BEST
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
20 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
20 - 70 8 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
5 - 35 0 - 45

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
EPEAT Compliance
 Silver
 Silver

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
5.8kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Height
422mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Depth
140mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
632mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Bezel Width On Side
Unknown - Click to provide data 2mm
Weight With Stand
5.7kg 3.9kg
BEST
Height With Stand
408.3mm
BEST
412.8mm
Depth With Stand
185mm
BEST
220mm
Width With Stand
548.6mm 540.9mm
BEST
Weight
3.6kg
BEST
3.9kg
Height
346.3mm
BEST
540.9mm
Depth
55mm 220mm
BEST
Width
548.6mm 412.8mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
 VGA
 AC
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
Feedback