Asus VG248QE vs DELL U2415 vs DELL UltraSharp 24 vs HP Pavilion 22xw

(357)
(169)
(169)
Asus VG248QE
DELL U2415
DELL UltraSharp 24
HP Pavilion 22xw

Top Prices

Newegg UK
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Factory Outlet Store
In stock
B&H Photo
In stock
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Amazon US
Out of stock
No prices found
eBay
Standard delivery: $29.99
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock
B&H Photo
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
A lot brighter display brightness Edit
The Asus VG248QE has a display brightness of 350 cd/m² cd/m², whereas the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both only 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (50 cd/m² dimmer) and the HP Pavilion 22xw is only a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (100 cd/m² dimmer).
7ms faster response time Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a 1msms response time PC monitor. That's 5ms faster than the DELL U2415 (7msms), 7ms faster than the DELL UltraSharp 24 (7msms) and 6ms faster than the HP Pavilion 22xw (7msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Available from 7 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also increases the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Twelve more awards
The Asus VG248QE has 13 awards, but the DELL U2415 has 1 award and the DELL UltraSharp 24 has 1 award.
User reviews are a bit better
Based on 319 user reviews, the Asus VG248QE has an average review score of 94%, whereas the DELL U2415 has an average rating of 91% (based on 166 reviews) and the DELL UltraSharp 24 has an average rating of 91% (based on 166 reviews).
13 Reasons For
2.6" bigger screen size Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 24.1"" PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 0.1" bigger than the Asus VG248QE (21.5"") and 2.6" bigger than the HP Pavilion 22xw (21.5""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

56.21mm bigger viewable height Edit
The DELL U2415 has a viewable height of 324mmmm (as does the DELL UltraSharp 24), whereas the HP Pavilion 22xw is only a 267.79mmmm viewable height PC monitor (56.21mm smaller).
9% bigger viewable width Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 518.4mmmm viewable width PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 42.34mm bigger than the HP Pavilion 22xw (476.06mmmm).
18° wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The DELL U2415 has a vertical viewing angle of 178°° (as do the DELL UltraSharp 24 and the HP Pavilion 22xw), whereas the Asus VG248QE is only a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
5% wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the DELL UltraSharp 24 and the HP Pavilion 22xw. That's 8° wider than the Asus VG248QE (178°°).
6.5cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 61.1cmcm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 6.5cm bigger than the HP Pavilion 22xw (54.6cmcm).
19% larger color gamut Edit
The DELL U2415 has a color gamut of 91%%, whereas the HP Pavilion 22xw is only a 72%% color gamut PC monitor (19% smaller).
Two DisplayPorts Edit
The DELL U2415 is a two DisplayPort PC monitor, whereas the DELL UltraSharp 24 only has one DisplayPort. Read more

We do not know the number of DisplayPorts on the HP Pavilion 22xw. It is possible that it does not have any DisplayPorts.

One more USB 3.0 port Edit
The number of USB 3.0 ports on the DELL U2415 is six, but the DELL UltraSharp 24 only has five USB 3.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 3.0 ports on the Asus VG248QE or the HP Pavilion 22xw. It is possible that they do not have any USB 3.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

One more HDMI port Edit
The DELL U2415 is a two HDMI port PC monitor (as does the DELL UltraSharp 24), whereas the HP Pavilion 22xw only has one HDMI port.
One more USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the DELL U2415 is six, but the DELL UltraSharp 24 only has five USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Asus VG248QE or the HP Pavilion 22xw. It is possible that they do not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

A lot shallower Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 45.7mmmm deep PC monitor (as does the DELL UltraSharp 24), whereas the Asus VG248QE is a 57.3mmmm deep PC monitor (11.6mm deeper) and the HP Pavilion 22xw is a 50.6mmmm deep PC monitor (4.9mm deeper).
Better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the DELL U2415 is 87% based on 3 reviews, whereas the average rating of the Asus VG248QE is 78% (based on 38 reviews).
9 Reasons For
11% bigger screen size Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 24.1"" PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 0.1" bigger than the Asus VG248QE (21.5"") and 2.6" bigger than the HP Pavilion 22xw (21.5""). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

18% bigger viewable height Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a viewable height of 324mmmm (as does the DELL U2415), however the HP Pavilion 22xw is only a 267.79mmmm viewable height PC monitor (56.21mm smaller).
Bigger viewable width Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 518.4mmmm viewable width PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 42.34mm bigger than the HP Pavilion 22xw (476.06mmmm).
11% wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a vertical viewing angle of 178°° (as do the DELL U2415 and the HP Pavilion 22xw), however the Asus VG248QE is only a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor (18° narrower).
Wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the DELL U2415 and the HP Pavilion 22xw. That's 8° wider than the Asus VG248QE (178°°).
11% bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 61.1cmcm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 6.5cm bigger than the HP Pavilion 22xw (54.6cmcm).
One more HDMI port Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has two HDMI ports (as does the DELL U2415), however the HP Pavilion 22xw only has one HDMI port.
11.6mm shallower Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a depth of 45.7mmmm (as does the DELL U2415), however the Asus VG248QE is a 57.3mmmm deep PC monitor (11.6mm deeper) and the HP Pavilion 22xw is a 50.6mmmm deep PC monitor (4.9mm deeper).
Better expert reviews
Based on 3 reviews, the average expert review score of the DELL UltraSharp 24 is 87%, however the average rating of the Asus VG248QE is 78% (based on 38 reviews).
8 Reasons For
Wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw is a 178°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor, and so do the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 18° wider than the Asus VG248QE (178°°).
8° wider horizontal viewing angle Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw has a horizontal viewing angle of 178°° (as do the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24), but the Asus VG248QE is only a 170°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitor (8° narrower).
Significantly lower power consumption when off Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw has a power consumption when off of 0.23WW, whereas the Asus VG248QE is a 0.5WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.27W higher).
Three times lower maximum power consumption Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw has a maximum power consumption of 24WW, but the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 75WW maximum power consumption PC monitors (51W higher).
97% lighter Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw is a 2.8kgg weight PC monitor. That's 2.7g lighter than the Asus VG248QE (2.8kgg) and 1.5g lighter than the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 (2.8kgg).
16% shorter Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw has a height of 303.4mmmm, however the Asus VG248QE is a 340.4mmmm tall PC monitor (37mm taller) and the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 350.6mmmm tall PC monitors (47.2mm taller).
15% narrower Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw has a width of 498.5mmmm, however the Asus VG248QE is a 569.4mmmm wide PC monitor (70.9mm wider) and the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 532.2mmmm wide PC monitors (33.7mm wider).
$95 cheaper
The HP Pavilion 22xw costs $109.99, whereas the Asus VG248QE is $204.99 and the DELL U2415 is $239.00.

Reasons Against

13 Reasons Against
A bit smaller screen size Edit
The Asus VG248QE has a screen size of 24"", whereas the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 24.1"" PC monitors (0.1" bigger) and the HP Pavilion 22xw is a 21.5"" PC monitor (2.5" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

18° narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a 160°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 18° narrower than the DELL U2415, the DELL UltraSharp 24 and the HP Pavilion 22xw (178°°).
Moderately narrower horizontal viewing angle Edit
The Asus VG248QE has a horizontal viewing angle of 170°°, whereas the DELL U2415, the DELL UltraSharp 24 and the HP Pavilion 22xw are all 178°° horizontal viewing angle PC monitors (8° wider).
One less DisplayPort Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a one DisplayPort PC monitor (as does the DELL UltraSharp 24), whereas the DELL U2415 only has two DisplayPorts. Read more

We do not know the number of DisplayPorts on the HP Pavilion 22xw. It is possible that it does not have any DisplayPorts.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a one HDMI port PC monitor, and so does the HP Pavilion 22xw, whereas the DELL UltraSharp 24 only has two HDMI ports.
Vastly higher power consumption when off Edit
The Asus VG248QE has a power consumption when off of 0.5WW, however the HP Pavilion 22xw is a 0.23WW power consumption when off PC monitor (0.27W lower).
Heavier Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a 5.5kgg weight PC monitor. That's 1.2g heavier than the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 (2.8kgg) and 2.7g heavier than the HP Pavilion 22xw (2.8kgg).
Taller Edit
Asus VG248QE is 340.4mmmm tall, but the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 350.6mmmm tall PC monitors (10.2mm taller) and the HP Pavilion 22xw is a 303.4mmmm tall PC monitor (37mm shorter).
11.6mm deeper Edit
The Asus VG248QE is a 57.3mmmm deep PC monitor. That's 11.6mm deeper than the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 (50.6mmmm) and 6.7mm deeper than the HP Pavilion 22xw (50.6mmmm).
Wider Edit
Asus VG248QE is 569.4mmmm wide, but the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 532.2mmmm wide PC monitors (37.2mm narrower) and the HP Pavilion 22xw is a 498.5mmmm wide PC monitor (70.9mm narrower).
$95 more expensive
The Asus VG248QE is more expensive than the HP Pavilion 22xw by $95.
Over two years older
The Asus VG248QE is older than the DELL U2415 by 22 months, older than the DELL UltraSharp 24 by 22 months and older than the HP Pavilion 22xw by three years.
Lower expert review Score
The average expert rating of the Asus VG248QE is only 78%, whereas the average expert rating of the DELL U2415 is 87% (based on 3 reviews) and the DELL UltraSharp 24 is 87% (based on 3 reviews).
12 Reasons Against
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus VG248QE (250 cd/m² cd/m²) and 50 cd/m² brighter than the HP Pavilion 22xw (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
Vastly slower response time Edit
The DELL U2415 has a response time of 6msms, however the Asus VG248QE is a 1msms response time PC monitor (5ms faster), the DELL UltraSharp 24 is an 8msms response time PC monitor (2ms slower) and the HP Pavilion 22xw is a 7msms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less DVI port Edit
The DELL U2415 has DVI ports, however the Asus VG248QE only has one DVI port. Read more

We do not know the number of DVI ports on the DELL UltraSharp 24 or the HP Pavilion 22xw. It is possible that they do not have any DVI ports.

Higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL U2415 is a 75WW maximum power consumption PC monitor, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 51W higher than the HP Pavilion 22xw (24WW).
A lot heavier Edit
The DELL U2415 has a weight of 4.3kgg (as does the DELL UltraSharp 24), whereas the Asus VG248QE is a 5.5kgg weight PC monitor (1.2g heavier) and the HP Pavilion 22xw is a 2.8kgg weight PC monitor (1.5g lighter).
Taller Edit
DELL U2415 is 350.6mmmm tall, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 10.2mm taller than the Asus VG248QE (303.4mmmm) and 47.2mm taller than the HP Pavilion 22xw (303.4mmmm).
Wider Edit
DELL U2415 is 532.2mmmm wide, and so does the DELL UltraSharp 24. That's 37.2mm narrower than the Asus VG248QE (498.5mmmm) and 33.7mm wider than the HP Pavilion 22xw (498.5mmmm).
More expensive by $129
The DELL U2415 is $34.01 more expensive than the Asus VG248QE and $129.01 more expensive than the HP Pavilion 22xw.
Fewer sellers
The DELL U2415 is only stocked by 6 shops, but the Asus VG248QE is stocked by 12 stores. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Older by nine months
The DELL U2415 is nine months older than the HP Pavilion 22xw. The DELL U2415 is the same age as the DELL UltraSharp 24.
Twelve less awards
The DELL U2415 has only received 1 award, but the Asus VG248QE has received 13 awards.
User review Rating is moderately Worse
The average user rating of the DELL U2415 is 91%, whereas the average user rating of the Asus VG248QE is 94% (based on 319 reviews).
13 Reasons Against
17% dimmer display brightness Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Asus VG248QE (250 cd/m² cd/m²) and 50 cd/m² brighter than the HP Pavilion 22xw (250 cd/m² cd/m²).
7ms slower response time Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a response time of 8msms, but the Asus VG248QE is a 1msms response time PC monitor (7ms faster), the DELL U2415 is a 6msms response time PC monitor (2ms faster) and the HP Pavilion 22xw is a 7msms response time PC monitor (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one DisplayPort Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has one DisplayPort, and so does the Asus VG248QE, however the DELL U2415 only has two DisplayPorts. Read more

We do not know the number of DisplayPorts on the HP Pavilion 22xw. It is possible that it does not have any DisplayPorts.

One less USB 3.0 port Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a five USB 3.0 port PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2415 only has six USB 3.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 3.0 ports on the Asus VG248QE or the HP Pavilion 22xw. It is possible that they do not have any USB 3.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

One less USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a five USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the DELL U2415 only has six USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Asus VG248QE or the HP Pavilion 22xw. It is possible that they do not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

68% higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 75WW maximum power consumption PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 51W higher than the HP Pavilion 22xw (24WW).
1.5g heavier Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has a weight of 4.3kgg (as does the DELL U2415), however the Asus VG248QE is a 5.5kgg weight PC monitor (1.2g heavier) and the HP Pavilion 22xw is a 2.8kgg weight PC monitor (1.5g lighter).
47.2mm taller Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 350.6mmmm tall PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 10.2mm taller than the Asus VG248QE (303.4mmmm) and 47.2mm taller than the HP Pavilion 22xw (303.4mmmm).
7% wider Edit
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is a 532.2mmmm wide PC monitor, and so does the DELL U2415. That's 37.2mm narrower than the Asus VG248QE (498.5mmmm) and 33.7mm wider than the HP Pavilion 22xw (498.5mmmm).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Older by nine months
The DELL UltraSharp 24 is nine months older than the HP Pavilion 22xw. The DELL UltraSharp 24 is the same age as the DELL U2415.
Twelve less awards
The DELL UltraSharp 24 has only received 1 award, whereas the Asus VG248QE has received 13 awards.
User review Rating is a little Worse
The DELL UltraSharp 24's average user score is 91%, however the Asus VG248QE's is 94% (based on 319 reviews).
11 Reasons Against
Smaller screen size Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw has a screen size of 21.5"", but the Asus VG248QE is a 24"" PC monitor (2.5" bigger) and the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 24.1"" PC monitors (2.6" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller viewable height Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw is a 267.79mmmm viewable height PC monitor. That's 56.21mm smaller than the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 (267.79mmmm).
42.34mm smaller viewable width Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw has a viewable width of 476.06mmmm, however the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 518.4mmmm viewable width PC monitors (42.34mm bigger).
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw has a display diagonal of 54.6cmcm, but the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 61.1cmcm display diagonal PC monitors (6.5cm bigger).
100 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² cd/m², but the Asus VG248QE is a 350 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (100 cd/m² brighter) and the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 are both 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (50 cd/m² brighter).
86% slower response time Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw is a 7msms response time PC monitor. That's 6ms slower than the Asus VG248QE (7msms), 1ms slower than the DELL U2415 (7msms) and 1ms faster than the DELL UltraSharp 24 (7msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Smaller color gamut Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw is a 72%% color gamut PC monitor. That's 19% smaller than the DELL U2415 (72%%).
Only one HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the HP Pavilion 22xw is one, and so does the Asus VG248QE, but the DELL UltraSharp 24 only has two HDMI ports.
Only DVI ports Edit
The HP Pavilion 22xw is a DVI port PC monitor, whereas the Asus VG248QE only has one DVI port. Read more

We do not know the number of DVI ports on the DELL U2415 or the DELL UltraSharp 24. It is possible that they do not have any DVI ports.

10% deeper Edit
HP Pavilion 22xw is 50.6mmmm deep. That's 6.7mm shallower than the Asus VG248QE (50.6mmmm) and 4.9mm deeper than the DELL U2415 and the DELL UltraSharp 24 (50.6mmmm).
Not as many stockists
Only 5 retailers sells the HP Pavilion 22xw, however 12 retailers sell the Asus VG248QE and 6 shops sell the DELL U2415. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.

Awards

13 Awards
01net.com: 5 Star
altomdata.dk: Recommended
elektroniktest.dk: Silver
hardware.info: Silver Award
hwa.com.tr: Player's Dream
kitguru.net: Worth Considering
moddingmx.com: Gold
ozeros.com: Recommended
profesionalreview.com: Gold
Techsweden.org: Value for Money
tomshardware.co.uk: Smart Buy
tomshardware.com: Smart Buy
xfastest.com: Innovation Award
1 Award
pcmagazine.ru: 5 Star
1 Award
pcmagazine.ru: 5 Star
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

49 months Ago 26 months Ago 27 months Ago 17 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 28.20
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 30.53
Electricity cost - switched on $ 28.20
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 30.53
Purchase price $ 109.99
Total cost of ownership $ 140.52
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data
0.2T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.2T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.2 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
24" 24.1"
BEST
24.1"
BEST
21.5"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
BEST
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
BEST
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1200
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
BEST
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
Backlight Type
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
 W-LED
 W-LED
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
BEST
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 360p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
50 - 144 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
30 - 140 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Size Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 611mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 324mm
BEST
324mm
BEST
267.79mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 518.4mm
BEST
518.4mm
BEST
476.06mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.2768 x 0.2768 0.27 x 0.27 0.27 x 0.27 0.248 x 0.248
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M 16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
160° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
170° 178°
BEST
178°
BEST
178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 61.1cm
BEST
61.1cm
BEST
54.6cm
Display Technology
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
Display Brightness
350 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
1ms
BEST
6ms 8ms 7ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 91%
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 72%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:10
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
 16:9
 16:10
BEST
 16:9
 16:10
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 102

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPort
1 2
BEST
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 6
BEST
5 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 2
BEST
2
BEST
1
DVI-D Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Mini DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
1
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 6
BEST
5 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
4W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Coloured Feet
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver
Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 115mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
15 - 5 Unknown - Click to provide data -21 - 5 -2 - 25

Power

Input Current
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.5A Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0.23W
BEST
Typical Power Consumption
45W 23W
BEST
23W
BEST
23W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W 0.5W 0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 75W 75W 24W
BEST
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90 5 - 90 20 - 90
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80 10 - 80 20 - 70
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 -20 - 60 -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40 0 - 40 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8.1kg
BEST
8.4kg 8.4kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Height
413mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Depth
221mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
674mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 3.5kg
Height With Stand
499.9mm 517.9mm 517.9mm 384.4mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
231mm 205mm 205mm 150.8mm
BEST
Width With Stand
569.4mm 532.2mm 532.2mm 498.5mm
BEST
Weight
5.5kg 4.3kg 4.3kg 2.8kg
BEST
Height
340.4mm 350.6mm 350.6mm 303.4mm
BEST
Depth
57.3mm 45.7mm
BEST
45.7mm
BEST
50.6mm
Width
569.4mm 532.2mm 532.2mm 498.5mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
 VGA
 DVI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
 VGA
Feedback