Samsung S27E390H vs Samsung S27E391H vs Samsung T27D390

(105)
(104)
(6)
Samsung S27E390H
Samsung S27E391H
Samsung T27D390

Top Prices

Amazon US
Out of stock
PC Rush
Delivery unknown
In stock
No prices found No prices found

Reasons For

2 Reasons For
4.6kg lighter Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has a weight of 4.6kgg, however the Samsung S27E391H is a 4.6kg weight PC monitor (4.6kg heavier) and the Samsung T27D390 is a 4.7kgg weight PC monitor (0.1g heavier).
Marginally better user reviews
Based on 104 user reviews, the average review score of the Samsung S27E390H is 86%, however the average rating of the Samsung T27D390 is 83% (based on 6 reviews).
4 Reasons For
25% faster response time Edit
The Samsung S27E391H is a 4ms response time PC monitor. That's 0ms faster than the Samsung S27E390H (5msms) and 1ms faster than the Samsung T27D390 (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

11% lower annual energy consumption Edit
The Samsung S27E391H has an annual energy consumption of 37kWh, however the Samsung S27E390H is a 37kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (0kWh higher) and the Samsung T27D390 is a 41kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (4kWh higher).
16W lower maximum power consumption Edit
The Samsung S27E391H has a maximum power consumption of 29W, whereas the Samsung S27E390H is a 29WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (0W higher) and the Samsung T27D390 is a 45WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (16W higher).
User reviews are moderately better
Based on 104 reviews, the Samsung S27E391H has an average user review score of 86%, whereas the Samsung T27D390 has an average rating of 83% (based on 6 reviews).
1 Reason For
Two HDMI ports Edit
The Samsung T27D390 is a two HDMI port PC monitor, whereas the Samsung S27E390H only has one HDMI port and the Samsung S27E391H only has one HDMI port.

Reasons Against

2 Reasons Against
One less HDMI port Edit
The Samsung S27E390H has one HDMI port (as does the Samsung S27E391H), however the Samsung T27D390 only has two HDMI ports.
Older by one month
The Samsung S27E390H is one month older than the Samsung S27E391H.
3 Reasons Against
Only one HDMI port Edit
The Samsung S27E391H is a one HDMI port PC monitor, and so does the Samsung S27E390H, whereas the Samsung T27D390 only has two HDMI ports.
4.6kg heavier Edit
The Samsung S27E391H is a 4.6kg weight PC monitor. That's 4.6kg heavier than the Samsung S27E390H (4.7kgg) and 4.6kg heavier than the Samsung T27D390 (4.7kgg).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
7 Reasons Against
20% slower response time Edit
The Samsung T27D390 is a 5msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms slower than the Samsung S27E390H (5msms) and 1ms slower than the Samsung S27E391H (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

4kWh higher annual energy consumption Edit
The Samsung T27D390 has an annual energy consumption of 41kWhkWh, however the Samsung S27E390H is a 37kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (4kWh lower) and the Samsung S27E391H is a 37kWh annual energy consumption PC monitor (4kWh lower).
16W higher maximum power consumption Edit
The Samsung T27D390 has a maximum power consumption of 45WW, whereas the Samsung S27E390H is a 29WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (16W lower) and the Samsung S27E391H is a 29W maximum power consumption PC monitor (16W lower).
Heavier Edit
The Samsung T27D390 is a 4.7kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.1g heavier than the Samsung S27E390H (4.7kgg) and 4.6kg lighter than the Samsung S27E391H (4.7kgg).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Seven months older
The Samsung T27D390 is older than the Samsung S27E390H by six months and older than the Samsung S27E391H by seven months.
Moderately Lower user review Score
The average user rating of the Samsung T27D390 is 83%, whereas the average user rating of the Samsung S27E390H is 86% (based on 104 reviews) and the Samsung S27E391H is 86% (based on 104 reviews).

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

22 months Ago 22 months Ago 29 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 30.59
Electricity cost - standby $ 1.40
Total running cost $ 31.99
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.21T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.21 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
5
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Display

Screen Size
27" 27"
BEST
27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
BEST
 1080p
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Viewable Height
336.3mm
BEST
336.3mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
597.9mm
BEST
597.9mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.3114 x 0.3114 0.3114 x 0.3114 Unknown - Click to provide data
Display Colour Count
16.77M
BEST
16.77M 16.77M
BEST
Vertical Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
178° 178°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178°
BEST
178° 178°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.5cm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 68.58cm
Display Technology
 PLS
 PLS
 PLS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
Response Time
4ms 4ms
BEST
5ms
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Brightness (min)
240 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
RF Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
SCART Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Composite Video in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Component Video in Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 2.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
HDMI Port
1 1 2
BEST
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1
Component Video (YPbPr/YCbCr) Out Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
USB Type-A Downstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

Digital Signal Format
 DVB
 DVB-T
 DVB-C
 DVB
 DVB-T
 DVB-C
 DVB
 DVB-T
 DVB-C
RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 10W
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 2

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
Heavy Metal Free Design
 Hg (mercury)
 Hg (mercury)
 Hg (mercury)

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64
 Windows 8
 Windows 8.1
 Windows 8.1 x64
 Windows 8.1 Pro
 Windows 8.1 Pro x64
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise
 Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-2 - 15 -2 - 15 -2 - 18
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 27

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
17.8W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
25W 25W
BEST
28W
Standby Power Consumption
0.3W 0.3W
BEST
0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
37kWh 37kWh
BEST
41kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
29W 29W
BEST
45W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 220
 220-240
 20-24
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 220
 220-240
 20-24
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 220
 220-240
 20-24
Power Consumption (DPMS)
0.3 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
10 - 80 10 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
10 - 40 10 - 40 Unknown - Click to provide data

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
6.6kg
BEST
6.7kg 7.4kg
Packaging Height
140mm 120mm
BEST
439mm
Packaging Depth
442mm 442mm 151mm
BEST
Packaging Width
703mm 703mm 689mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
5.1kg
BEST
5.1kg 5.3kg
Height With Stand
452.9mm 452.9mm
BEST
466mm
Depth With Stand
181.9mm 181.9mm 169.2mm
BEST
Width With Stand
626mm 626mm 619.2mm
BEST
Weight
4.6kg
BEST
4.6kg 4.7kg
Height
377.2mm 377.2mm 366.9mm
Depth
70.8mm 70.8mm 34.1mm
Width
626mm 626mm 619.2mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC

Technical Details

Samsung Magic Function
MagicBright, MagicUpscale Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Active Display Area (W X H)
597.9 x 336.3 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback