Acer XB270H vs HP Z2

(187)
(4)
Acer XB270H
HP Z2

Top Prices

eBay
B&H Photo
In stock
MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

5 Reasons For
0.13cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The Acer XB270H has a display diagonal of 68.6cmcm, but the HP Z2 is only a 68.47cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.13cm smaller).
20mm higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The Acer XB270H is a 150mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 20mm higher than the HP Z2 (130mmmm).
Lighter Edit
The Acer XB270H is a 5.4kgg weight PC monitor. That's 2.3g lighter than the HP Z2 (7.7kgg).
Higher energy efficiency rating
The energy efficiency rating of the Acer XB270H is "B", but the rating of the HP Z2 is "B".
Expert reviews are appreciably better
Based on 30 reviews, the Acer XB270H has an average expert review score of 88%, but the HP Z2 has an average rating of 73% (based on 4 reviews).
9 Reasons For
15% brighter display brightness Edit
The HP Z2 is a 350 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the Acer XB270H (350 cd/m² cd/m²).
A lot larger color gamut Edit
The HP Z2 has a color gamut of 99%%, however the Acer XB270H is only a 72%% color gamut PC monitor (27% smaller).
Two DisplayPorts Edit
The HP Z2 has two DisplayPorts, however the Acer XB270H only has one DisplayPort.
Shorter Edit
The HP Z2 is a 364.1mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 16.9mm shorter than the Acer XB270H (364.1mmmm).
16% shallower Edit
The HP Z2 has a depth of 53.9mmmm, however the Acer XB270H is a 62mmmm deep PC monitor (8.1mm deeper).
5% narrower Edit
The HP Z2 is a 614.3mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 25.4mm narrower than the Acer XB270H (614.3mmmm).
Cheaper by $157
The HP Z2 costs $156.99 less than the Acer XB270H.
5 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Energy efficiency rating is better
The HP Z2 has an energy efficiency rating of "B", however the Acer XB270H has a rating of "B".

Reasons Against

9 Reasons Against
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The Acer XB270H has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² cd/m², but the HP Z2 is a 350 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
38% smaller color gamut Edit
The Acer XB270H is a 72%% color gamut PC monitor. That's 27% smaller than the HP Z2 (99%%).
One less DisplayPort Edit
The number of DisplayPorts on the Acer XB270H is one, but the HP Z2 only has two DisplayPorts.
A little taller Edit
The Acer XB270H has a height of 381mmmm, however the HP Z2 is a 364.1mmmm tall PC monitor (16.9mm shorter).
Deeper Edit
Acer XB270H is 62mmmm deep. That's 8.1mm deeper than the HP Z2 (53.9mmmm).
25.4mm wider Edit
The Acer XB270H has a width of 639.7mmmm, however the HP Z2 is a 614.3mmmm wide PC monitor (25.4mm narrower).
$157 more expensive
The Acer XB270H is more expensive than the HP Z2 by $156.99.
Not as many stockists
Only 4 shops sells the Acer XB270H, however 9 stores sell the HP Z2. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
One month older
The Acer XB270H is older than the HP Z2 by one month.
4 Reasons Against
1% smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP Z2 is a 68.47cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.13cm smaller than the Acer XB270H (68.47cmcm).
Lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The HP Z2 has a maximum height adjustment of 130mmmm, but the Acer XB270H is a 150mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (20mm higher).
2.3g heavier Edit
The HP Z2 has a weight of 7.7kgg, however the Acer XB270H is a 5.4kgg weight PC monitor (2.3g lighter).
Expert review Rating is much Worse
The HP Z2's average expert score is only 73%, however the Acer XB270H's is 88% (based on 30 reviews).

Awards

16 Awards
3dnews.ru: Innovative Design
benchmark.pl: Great Product
Digital Versus: 5 Star
Expert Reviews: Recommended
gamestar.de: Platinum
hardware.info: Gold Award
hardwarecanucks.com: Dam Innovative
kitguru.net: Worth Buying
pclab.pl: Power Award
pcper.com: Editor's Choice
SweClockers.com: Top Class
tomshardware.co.uk: Editor Recommended
tomshardware.com: Editor Recommended
tomshw.it: Editor Recommended
tweaktown.com: Editor's Choice
uk.hardware.info: Gold
No awards found

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

21 months Ago 20 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

No data No data

Display

Screen Size
27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
BEST
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 10000000:1
BEST
 10000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1366 х 768
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1366 х 768
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 1440p
 1080p
 1440p
BEST
HD Type
 2K Ultra HD
 2K Ultra HD
BEST
Viewable Size Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 335.66mm
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 596.74mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 60
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 90
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.2331 x 0.2331
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.6cm
BEST
68.47cm
Display Technology
 TN+Film
 TN+Film
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
1ms 14ms
BEST
Color Gamut
72% 99%
BEST
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Pixel Density
82 Unknown - Click to provide data

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DisplayPort
1 2
BEST
USB 3.0 Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 4
HDMI Port
1 1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Mini DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DVI Port
1 1
USB Type-A Downstream Port
4 4
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
USB Upstream Port Type
 USB Type-B
 USB Type-B

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
4W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

Mean Time Between Failures
30,000h Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
0 - 90 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
150mm
BEST
130mm
Tilt Angle
-5 - 35 -5 - 22
Swivel Angle Range
0 - 60 -45 - 45

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
Power Consumption When Off
0.45W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
37W 37W
Standby Power Consumption
0.45W
BEST
0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
55kWh 55kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 83W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192
Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
BEST
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
10.6kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Height
515mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Depth
199mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
706mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
7.9kg 7.7kg
BEST
Height With Stand
558mm 533.7mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
245mm 18.2mm
BEST
Width With Stand
640mm 614.3mm
BEST
Weight
5.4kg
BEST
7.7kg
Height
381mm 364.1mm
BEST
Depth
62mm 53.9mm
BEST
Width
639.7mm 614.3mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 VGA
 DVI
 DisplayPort
 AC
 USB
 VGA
 DVI
 DisplayPort
 AC

Other Features

Quantity Per Pallet
40 Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback