Asus PG279Q vs NEC EA275WMi

(177)
Asus PG279Q
NEC EA275WMi

Top Prices

No prices found

Reasons For

8 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The Asus PG279Q is a 68.6cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.099999999999994cm bigger than the NEC EA275WMi (68.5cmcm).
A lot faster response time Edit
The Asus PG279Q has a response time of 4msms, however the NEC EA275WMi is a 6msms response time PC monitor (2ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Higher RMS rated audio power Edit
The Asus PG279Q is a 4WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor. That's 2W higher than the NEC EA275WMi (2WW). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

1.7g lighter Edit
The Asus PG279Q has a weight of 7kgg, whereas the NEC EA275WMi is an 8.7kgg weight PC monitor (1.7g heavier).
Shorter Edit
Asus PG279Q is 362.96mmmm tall. That's 54.94mm shorter than the NEC EA275WMi (417.9mmmm).
Narrower Edit
Asus PG279Q is 619.77mmmm wide. That's 19.43mm narrower than the NEC EA275WMi (639.2mmmm).
Fourteen more awards
The Asus PG279Q has 15 awards from expert review sites, but the NEC EA275WMi has 1 award.
Better expert reviews
The average expert review score of the Asus PG279Q is 87% based on 23 reviews, whereas the average rating of the NEC EA275WMi is 80% (based on 1 review).
3 Reasons For
Two DisplayPorts Edit
The NEC EA275WMi is a two DisplayPort PC monitor, whereas the Asus PG279Q only has one DisplayPort.
One more USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the NEC EA275WMi is three, but the Asus PG279Q only has two USB Type-A downstream ports.
Moderately lower power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The NEC EA275WMi has a power consumption when in PowerSave mode of 0.47WW, but the Asus PG279Q is a 0.5WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (0.03W higher).

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
Only one DisplayPort Edit
The Asus PG279Q is a one DisplayPort PC monitor, whereas the NEC EA275WMi only has two DisplayPorts.
One less USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Asus PG279Q is two, but the NEC EA275WMi only has three USB Type-A downstream ports.
Marginally higher power consumption when in PowerSave mode Edit
The Asus PG279Q has a power consumption when in PowerSave mode of 0.5WW, but the NEC EA275WMi is a 0.47WW power consumption when in PowerSave mode PC monitor (0.03W lower).
Older by two months
The Asus PG279Q is two months older than the NEC EA275WMi.
9 Reasons Against
Smaller display diagonal Edit
The NEC EA275WMi is a 68.5cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.099999999999994cm smaller than the Asus PG279Q (68.5cmcm).
A lot slower response time Edit
The NEC EA275WMi has a response time of 6msms, however the Asus PG279Q is a 4msms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Lower RMS rated audio power Edit
The NEC EA275WMi is a 2WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor. That's 2W lower than the Asus PG279Q (2WW). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

1.7g heavier Edit
The NEC EA275WMi has a weight of 8.7kgg, whereas the Asus PG279Q is a 7kgg weight PC monitor (1.7g lighter).
Taller Edit
NEC EA275WMi is 417.9mmmm tall. That's 54.94mm taller than the Asus PG279Q (417.9mmmm).
Wider Edit
NEC EA275WMi is 639.2mmmm wide. That's 19.43mm wider than the Asus PG279Q (639.2mmmm).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Fourteen less awards
The NEC EA275WMi has only received 1 award, but the Asus PG279Q has received 15 awards.
Expert review Rating is Worse
The average expert rating of the NEC EA275WMi is 80%, whereas the average expert rating of the Asus PG279Q is 87% (based on 23 reviews).

Awards

15 Awards
3dnews.ru: Recommended
Digital Versus: 5 Star
Digitaltrends.com: Recommended Product
gamestar.de: Platinum
hardware.info: Ulitmate
hardwareluxx.de: Excellent Hardware
hardwareluxx.ru: Excellent Hardware
HEXUS.net: Innovation
hothardware.com: Editor's Choice
itwriter.ru: Recommended
pclab.pl: Power Award
pcper.com: Gold
SweClockers.com: Recommended
tek.no: Recommended
tweaktown.com: Editor's Choice
1 Award
PC Mag: Editor's Choice

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

15 months Ago 13 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 57.62
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 57.62

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.37T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.37 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
10
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27" 27"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 20000:1
 20000:1
BEST
Display Type
 LED
 LED
BEST
Graphics Resolution
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 832 x 624
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 2560 x 1440
 1920 x 1440
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1152 x 864 (XGA+)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 832 x 624
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 31.5 - 83
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
30 - 165 56 - 75
Horizontal Scan Range
34 - 209 31.5 - 83
Pixel Pitch
0.233 x 0.233 0.233 x 0.233
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.6cm
BEST
68.5cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
350 cd/m² 350 cd/m²
Response Time
4ms
BEST
6ms
Color Gamut
100% Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 1
USB Version
 3.1
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 3.0
 2.0/3.0
 2.0/3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0
 3.1
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 3.0
 2.0/3.0
 2.0/3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 2.0
DisplayPort
1 2
BEST
USB 3.0 Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 1
DVI-I Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Type-A Downstream Port
2 3
BEST
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
4W
BEST
2W
Loudspeaker
2 2

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise
 Windows 7 Starter
 Windows 7 Home Basic
 Windows 7 Ultimate
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Starter x64
 Windows 7 Home Basic x64
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 7 Home Premium x64
 Windows 7 Professional
 Windows 7 Professional x64
 Windows 7 Ultimate x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise x64
 Windows 7 Enterprise

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
0 - 90 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
Unknown - Click to provide data 130mm
Tilt Angle
20 - -5 -5 - 30
Swivel Angle Range
60 - -60 -170 - 170
OSD Language
5 Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.5W 0.47W
BEST
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
90W 47W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 60kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 57W
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 220
 100-220
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 220
 100-220

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 MPR II
 TCO
 RoHS
 MPR II
 TCO

Weight & Dimensions

Packaging Height
456mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Depth
300mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Packaging Width
756mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Height With Stand
552.53mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Depth With Stand
237.9mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Width With Stand
619.77mm Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight
7kg
BEST
8.7kg
Height
362.96mm
BEST
417.9mm
Depth
65.98mm 230mm
BEST
Width
619.77mm
BEST
639.2mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 HDMI
 AC
 DisplayPort

Other Features

Power Consumption in Economy Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 35W

Technical Details

Number of Colours
Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77
Light Sensor
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Feedback