Acer B276H vs HP Z Display Z27

(5)
Acer B276H
HP Z Display Z27

Top Prices

eBay
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Newegg UK
Made Technology
Delivery unknown
No prices found

Reasons For

9 Reasons For
Hugely more display colour count Edit
Acer B276H is 16.77MM display colours, but the HP Z Display Z27 is only a 1,070MM display colours PC monitor (15.77M less).
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The Acer B276H is a 350 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the HP Z Display Z27 (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
A lot faster response time Edit
The Acer B276H has a response time of 6msms, however the HP Z Display Z27 is an 8msms response time PC monitor (2ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

14% higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The Acer B276H has a maximum height adjustment of 150mmmm, however the HP Z Display Z27 is only a 130mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (20mm lower).
Lower annual energy consumption Edit
The Acer B276H is a 75kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 2kWh lower than the HP Z Display Z27 (77kWhkWh).
1.4g lighter Edit
The Acer B276H has a weight of 6kgg, whereas the HP Z Display Z27 is a 7.4kgg weight PC monitor (1.4g heavier).
Cheaper by $82
The Acer B276H is $82.19 cheaper than the HP Z Display Z27.
Cheaper to run by $60.19
Over five years the Acer B276H is $60.19 cheaper to run than the HP Z Display Z27. Read more
Energy efficiency rating is superior
The Acer B276H has an energy efficiency rating of "C", whereas the HP Z Display Z27 has a rating of "C".
7 Reasons For
Two DisplayPorts Edit
The HP Z Display Z27 has two DisplayPorts, however the Acer B276H only has one DisplayPort.
Four more USB 3.0 ports Edit
The HP Z Display Z27 is a five USB 3.0 port PC monitor, whereas the Acer B276H only has one USB 3.0 port. Read more

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Four more USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The HP Z Display Z27 is a five USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the Acer B276H only has one USB Type-A downstream port.
Shorter Edit
The HP Z Display Z27 is a 380.3mmmm tall PC monitor. That's 0.69999999999999mm shorter than the Acer B276H (380.3mmmm).
1% narrower Edit
The HP Z Display Z27 is a 634.3mmmm wide PC monitor. That's 5.7mm narrower than the Acer B276H (634.3mmmm).
Energy efficiency rating is better
The HP Z Display Z27 has an energy efficiency rating of "C", however the Acer B276H has a rating of "C".
Vastly better user reviews
Based on 1 user review, the average review score of the HP Z Display Z27 is 100%, however the average rating of the Acer B276H is 76% (based on 5 reviews).

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
Only one DisplayPort Edit
The Acer B276H is a one DisplayPort PC monitor, whereas the HP Z Display Z27 only has two DisplayPorts.
Four less USB 3.0 ports Edit
The number of USB 3.0 ports on the Acer B276H is one, but the HP Z Display Z27 only has five USB 3.0 ports. Read more

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Four less USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Acer B276H is one, but the HP Z Display Z27 only has five USB Type-A downstream ports.
1% taller Edit
Acer B276H is 381mmmm tall. That's 0.69999999999999mm taller than the HP Z Display Z27 (380.3mmmm).
Wider Edit
Acer B276H is 640mmmm wide. That's 5.7mm wider than the HP Z Display Z27 (634.3mmmm).
Older by eleven months
The Acer B276H is eleven months older than the HP Z Display Z27.
User review Rating is significantly Worse
The average user rating of the Acer B276H is only 76%, whereas the average user rating of the HP Z Display Z27 is 100% (based on 1 review).
10 Reasons Against
Significantly less display colour count Edit
The HP Z Display Z27 is a 1,070MM display colours PC monitor, whereas the Acer B276H is a 16.77MM display colours PC monitor (15.77M more).
17% dimmer display brightness Edit
The HP Z Display Z27 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Acer B276H (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
Slower response time Edit
The HP Z Display Z27 has a response time of 8msms, but the Acer B276H is a 6msms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less DVI port Edit
The number of DVI ports on the HP Z Display Z27 is , but the Acer B276H only has one DVI port.
Lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The HP Z Display Z27 has a maximum height adjustment of 130mmmm, but the Acer B276H is a 150mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (20mm higher).
3% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The HP Z Display Z27 is a 77kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 2kWh higher than the Acer B276H (77kWhkWh).
19% heavier Edit
The HP Z Display Z27 has a weight of 7.4kgg, however the Acer B276H is a 6kgg weight PC monitor (1.4g lighter).
More expensive by $82
The HP Z Display Z27 is $82.19 more expensive than the Acer B276H.
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
$60.19 more expensive to run over five years
The running costs of the HP Z Display Z27 are $100.40 which is $60.19 more than the Acer B276H over five years. Show assumptions.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

33 months Ago 22 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 40.21
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 40.21
Purchase price $ 217.81
Total cost of ownership $ 258.02
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 98.07
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.33
Total running cost $ 100.40
Purchase price $ 300.00
Total cost of ownership $ 400.40
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

Environmental Impact

0.26T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.26 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
7
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
0.65T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.65 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
17
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27" 27"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 100000000:1
BEST
 100000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 2560 x 1440
 4096 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1600 (WQXGA)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1366 х 768
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 768
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 2560 x 1440
 4096 x 2160
 3840 x 2160
 2560 x 1600 (WQXGA)
 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 1200 (UXGA)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1366 х 768
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 768
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
BEST
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 2160p
 2160p
BEST
HD Type
 5K Ultra HD
 5K Ultra HD
BEST
Viewable Size Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 335.34mm
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 335.66mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 596.73mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 50 - 60
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 31 - 180
Pixel Pitch
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.11655 x 0.11655
Display Colour Count
16.77M
BEST
1,070M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
68.6cm 68.6cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
350 cd/m²
BEST
300 cd/m²
Response Time
6ms
BEST
8ms
Color Gamut
Unknown - Click to provide data 100%
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
Pixel Density
Unknown - Click to provide data 218

Ports & Interfaces

USB Version
 3.1
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 3.0
 3.1
 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 3.0
DisplayPort
1 2
BEST
USB 3.0 Port
1 5
BEST
HDMI Port
1 1
DVI-D Port
1 1
Mini DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
1
BEST
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 5
USB Type-A Downstream Port
1 5
BEST
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)

Design

Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
150mm
BEST
130mm
Tilt Angle
-5 - 35 -5 - 22
Swivel Angle Range
0 - 60 -180 - 180
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data 10

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 C
 C
Power Consumption When Off
0.35W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
32.8W
BEST
80W
Standby Power Consumption
0.45W
BEST
0.5W
Annual Energy Consumption
75kWh
BEST
77kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 125W
Input Voltage
 110 - 220
 110 - 220
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 110
 220
 110-220
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 110
 220
 110-220
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192
Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 95
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
BEST
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 9.7kg
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 474mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 285mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 730mm
Weight With Stand
8.5kg 7.4kg
BEST
Height With Stand
558mm 380.3mm
BEST
Depth With Stand
247mm 217.1mm
BEST
Width With Stand
640mm 634.3mm
BEST
Weight
6kg
BEST
7.4kg
Height
381mm 380.3mm
BEST
Depth
62mm 62mm
Width
640mm 634.3mm
BEST

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
 USB
 DVI
 AC
 DisplayPort
Feedback