HP Z22n vs Samsung S22E650D

HP Z22n
Samsung S22E650D

Top Prices

No prices found

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
Moderately bigger viewable width Edit
The HP Z22n has a viewable width of 476.06mmmm, however the Samsung S22E650D is only a 473.76mmmm viewable width PC monitor (2.3mm smaller).
Three USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The HP Z22n has three USB Type-A downstream ports, however the Samsung S22E650D only has two USB Type-A downstream ports.
20mm higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The HP Z22n is a 150mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 20mm higher than the Samsung S22E650D (130mmmm).
Lighter Edit
The HP Z22n is a 2.8kgg weight PC monitor. That's 2.1g lighter than the Samsung S22E650D (4.9kgg).
Marginally shorter Edit
The HP Z22n has a height of 293.6mmmm, however the Samsung S22E650D is a 301.9mmmm tall PC monitor (8.3mm taller).
Shallower Edit
HP Z22n is 52.2mmmm deep. That's 3.2mm shallower than the Samsung S22E650D (55.4mmmm).
16.2mm narrower Edit
The HP Z22n has a width of 488.1mmmm, however the Samsung S22E650D is a 504.3mmmm wide PC monitor (16.2mm wider).
3 Reasons For
Bigger viewable height Edit
The Samsung S22E650D is a 268.11mmmm viewable height PC monitor. That's 0.31999999999999mm bigger than the HP Z22n (268.11mmmm).
75% faster response time Edit
The Samsung S22E650D is a 4msms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms faster than the HP Z22n (4msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

$5 cheaper
The Samsung S22E650D costs $4.58 less than the HP Z22n.

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
1% smaller viewable height Edit
The HP Z22n is a 267.79mmmm viewable height PC monitor. That's 0.31999999999999mm smaller than the Samsung S22E650D (268.11mmmm).
Slower response time Edit
The HP Z22n is a 7msms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the Samsung S22E650D (4msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

$5 more expensive
The HP Z22n is more expensive than the Samsung S22E650D by $4.58.
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
8 Reasons Against
2.3mm smaller viewable width Edit
The Samsung S22E650D has a viewable width of 473.76mmmm, whereas the HP Z22n is a 476.06mmmm viewable width PC monitor (2.3mm bigger).
Only two USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The Samsung S22E650D is a two USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the HP Z22n only has three USB Type-A downstream ports.
Lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The Samsung S22E650D is a 130mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor. That's 20mm lower than the HP Z22n (130mmmm).
43% heavier Edit
The Samsung S22E650D is a 4.9kgg weight PC monitor. That's 2.1g heavier than the HP Z22n (4.9kgg).
8.3mm taller Edit
The Samsung S22E650D is a 301.9mmmm tall PC monitor, whereas the HP Z22n is a 293.6mmmm tall PC monitor (8.3mm shorter).
6% deeper Edit
The Samsung S22E650D has a depth of 55.4mmmm. That's 3.2mm deeper than the HP Z22n (55.4mmmm).
Slightly wider Edit
The Samsung S22E650D is a 504.3mmmm wide PC monitor, whereas the HP Z22n is a 488.1mmmm wide PC monitor (16.2mm narrower).
Seven months older
The Samsung S22E650D is older than the HP Z22n by seven months.

Date Released

13 months Ago 20 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -
Electricity cost - switched on $ 25.74
Electricity cost - standby $ 0.05
Total running cost $ 25.79
Purchase price $ 168.90
Total cost of ownership $ 194.69
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data
0.17T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.17 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
4
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
21.5" 21.5"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 5000000:1
BEST
 5000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
 1280 x 800
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
BEST
Viewable Height
267.79mm 268.11mm
BEST
Viewable Width
476.06mm
BEST
473.76mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.248 x 0.248 0.24825 x 0.24825
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
54.6cm
BEST
54.61cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m²
Response Time
7ms 4ms
BEST
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Brightness (min)
Unknown - Click to provide data 200
Maximum Refresh Rate
Unknown - Click to provide data 60Hz

Ports & Interfaces

DisplayPort
1 1
USB 2.0 Port
3 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB Type-A Downstream Port
3
BEST
2
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
Upstream Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 2

Design

Recyclable Material Percentage
Unknown - Click to provide data 30%
Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64
 Windows 10 Home
 Windows 10 Pro
 Windows 10 Enterprise
 Windows 10 Education
 Windows 10 Home x64
 Windows 10 Pro x64
 Windows 10 Enterprise x64
 Windows 10 Education x64

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
0 - 90 -1 - 95
Maximum Height Adjustment
150mm
BEST
130mm
Tilt Angle
-5 - 30 -3 - 25
Swivel Angle Range
-45 - 45 -45 - 45

Power

Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.01W
Typical Power Consumption
22.9W 21W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.01W
BEST
Maximum Power Consumption
34.7W Unknown - Click to provide data
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
Power Consumption (DPMS)
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Storage Range
5 - 95 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Operating Range
20 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
-20 - 60 Unknown - Click to provide data
Operating Temperature Range
5 - 35 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 TCO
BEST
Electromagnetic Compatibility
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 C-Tick
 CE
 FCC
 KCC
 CCC
 GB
 C-Tick

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 6.2kg
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 375mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 185mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 577mm
Weight With Stand
4.8kg
BEST
4.9kg
Height With Stand
477.4mm
BEST
489.4mm
Depth With Stand
189mm
BEST
210mm
Width With Stand
488.1mm
BEST
504.3mm
Weight
2.8kg
BEST
4.9kg
Height
293.6mm
BEST
301.9mm
Depth
52.2mm
BEST
55.4mm
Width
488.1mm
BEST
504.3mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 VGA
BEST

Technical Details

Samsung Eye Saver Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
Feedback