AOC I2757F vs Asus MX279H vs DELL S2715H vs Samsung S27D590

(562)
(320)
(20)
(99)
AOC I2757F
Asus MX279H
Samsung S27D590

Top Prices

Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Factory Outlet Store
In stock
B&H Photo
Delivery unknown
In stock
No prices found
Amazon US
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

6 Reasons For
1ms faster response time Edit
The AOC I2757F is a 5msms response time PC monitor, and so do the Asus MX279H and the Samsung S27D590. That's 1ms faster than the DELL S2715H (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two HDMI ports Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the AOC I2757F is two, and so do the Asus MX279H and the Samsung S27D590, but the DELL S2715H only has one HDMI port.
$90 cheaper
The AOC I2757F costs $169.99, whereas the Asus MX279H is $259.99 and the Samsung S27D590 is $529.00.
Eleven more awards
The AOC I2757F has 15 awards, however the Asus MX279H has 10 awards and the Samsung S27D590 has 4 awards.
Expert reviews are slightly better
The AOC I2757F has an average expert review score of 83% based on 38 reviews, but the Asus MX279H has an average rating of 80% (based on 35 reviews) and the Samsung S27D590 has an average rating of 81% (based on 20 reviews).
User reviews are slightly better
The AOC I2757F has an average user review score of 92% based on 524 reviews, but the Asus MX279H has an average rating of 89% (based on 285 reviews), the DELL S2715H has an average rating of 88% (based on 19 reviews) and the Samsung S27D590 has an average rating of 91% (based on 79 reviews).
4 Reasons For
0.039999999999992cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The Asus MX279H has a display diagonal of 68.6cmcm (as do the DELL S2715H and the Samsung S27D590), however the AOC I2757F is only a 68.56cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.039999999999992cm smaller).
Faster response time Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 5msms response time PC monitor, and so do the AOC I2757F and the Samsung S27D590. That's 1ms faster than the DELL S2715H (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two HDMI ports Edit
The Asus MX279H has two HDMI ports, and so do the AOC I2757F and the Samsung S27D590, however the DELL S2715H only has one HDMI port.
Available from 8 shops
A greater number of retailers increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
5 Reasons For
Bigger viewable height Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 336.31mmmm viewable height PC monitor. That's 0.16000000000003mm bigger than the AOC I2757F ().
0.28999999999996mm bigger viewable width Edit
The DELL S2715H has a viewable width of 597.89mmmm, however the AOC I2757F is only a 597.6mmmm viewable width PC monitor (0.28999999999996mm smaller).
Slightly bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL S2715H has a display diagonal of 68.6cmcm (as do the Asus MX279H and the Samsung S27D590), but the AOC I2757F is only a 68.56cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.039999999999992cm smaller).
One more USB 2.0 port Edit
The number of USB 2.0 ports on the DELL S2715H is two, but the AOC I2757F only has one USB 2.0 port. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 2.0 ports on the Asus MX279H or the Samsung S27D590. It is possible that they do not have any USB 2.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Having a number of USB 2.0 ports on your monitor is particularly useful for laptops where you frequently disconnect the laptop from the monitor. Just one USB connection from your laptop to your monitor will immediately connect all your other USB devices that are attached to the monitor.

Two USB Type-A downstream ports Edit
The DELL S2715H has two USB Type-A downstream ports, however the AOC I2757F only has one USB Type-A downstream port. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Asus MX279H or the Samsung S27D590. It is possible that they do not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

6 Reasons For
0.039999999999992cm bigger display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has a display diagonal of 68.6cmcm (as do the Asus MX279H and the DELL S2715H), however the AOC I2757F is only a 68.56cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (0.039999999999992cm smaller).
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has a display brightness of 300 cd/m² cd/m², however the AOC I2757F, the Asus MX279H and the DELL S2715H are all only 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitors (50 cd/m² dimmer).
Faster response time Edit
The Samsung S27D590 is a 5msms response time PC monitor, and so do the AOC I2757F and the Asus MX279H. That's 1ms faster than the DELL S2715H (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Two HDMI ports Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has two HDMI ports, and so do the AOC I2757F and the Asus MX279H, however the DELL S2715H only has one HDMI port.
25W lower maximum power consumption Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has a maximum power consumption of 30WW, however the DELL S2715H is a 55WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (25W higher).
Lighter Edit
The Samsung S27D590 is a 4.4kgg weight PC monitor. That's 1.3g lighter than the AOC I2757F (4.4kgg), 0.8g lighter than the Asus MX279H (4.4kgg) and 0.5g lighter than the DELL S2715H (4.4kgg).

Reasons Against

9 Reasons Against
Smaller viewable height Edit
The AOC I2757F is a 336.15mmmm viewable height PC monitor. That's 0.16000000000003mm smaller than the DELL S2715H ().
0.28999999999996mm smaller viewable width Edit
The AOC I2757F has a viewable width of 597.6mmmm, however the DELL S2715H is a 597.89mmmm viewable width PC monitor (0.28999999999996mm bigger).
A little smaller display diagonal Edit
The AOC I2757F has a display diagonal of 68.56cmcm, but the Asus MX279H, the DELL S2715H and the Samsung S27D590 are all 68.6cmcm display diagonal PC monitors (0.039999999999992cm bigger).
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The AOC I2757F has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² cd/m² (as do the Asus MX279H and the DELL S2715H), but the Samsung S27D590 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
One less USB 2.0 port Edit
The number of USB 2.0 ports on the AOC I2757F is one, but the DELL S2715H only has two USB 2.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 2.0 ports on the Asus MX279H or the Samsung S27D590. It is possible that they do not have any USB 2.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Having a number of USB 2.0 ports on your monitor is particularly useful for laptops where you frequently disconnect the laptop from the monitor. Just one USB connection from your laptop to your monitor will immediately connect all your other USB devices that are attached to the monitor.

Only one USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The AOC I2757F has one USB Type-A downstream port, however the DELL S2715H only has two USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Asus MX279H or the Samsung S27D590. It is possible that they do not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

Heavier Edit
The AOC I2757F is a 5.7kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.5g heavier than the Asus MX279H (4.4kgg), 0.8g heavier than the DELL S2715H (4.4kgg) and 1.3g heavier than the Samsung S27D590 (4.4kgg).
Not as many stockists
Only 1 seller sell the AOC I2757F, however 9 stores sell the Asus MX279H. Read more
Smaller numbers of stores reduces the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for the product.
Over two years older
The AOC I2757F is older than the DELL S2715H by two years and older than the Samsung S27D590 by 16 months. The AOC I2757F is the same age as the Asus MX279H.
7 Reasons Against
20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The Asus MX279H has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² cd/m² (as do the AOC I2757F and the DELL S2715H), however the Samsung S27D590 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
16% heavier Edit
The Asus MX279H is a 5.2kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.5g lighter than the AOC I2757F (4.4kgg), 0.3g heavier than the DELL S2715H (4.4kgg) and 0.8g heavier than the Samsung S27D590 (4.4kgg).
$90 more expensive
The Asus MX279H is more expensive than the AOC I2757F by $90.
Over two years older
The Asus MX279H is older than the DELL S2715H by two years and older than the Samsung S27D590 by 16 months. The Asus MX279H is the same age as the AOC I2757F.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Asus MX279H has received 10 awards, the AOC I2757F has received 15 awards.
A little Lower expert review Score
The Asus MX279H's average expert rating is 80%, however the AOC I2757F's is 83% (based on 38 reviews) and the Samsung S27D590's is 81% (based on 20 reviews).
A little Lower user review Score
The Asus MX279H's average user rating is 89%, however the AOC I2757F's is 92% (based on 524 reviews) and the Samsung S27D590's is 91% (based on 79 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The DELL S2715H has a display brightness of 250 cd/m² cd/m² (as do the AOC I2757F and the Asus MX279H), but the Samsung S27D590 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor (50 cd/m² brighter).
1ms slower response time Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 6msms response time PC monitor. That's 1ms slower than the AOC I2757F, the Asus MX279H and the Samsung S27D590 (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Only one HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the DELL S2715H is one, but the Samsung S27D590 only has two HDMI ports.
A lot higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL S2715H has a maximum power consumption of 55WW, but the Samsung S27D590 is a 30WW maximum power consumption PC monitor (25W lower).
Heavier Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 4.9kgg weight PC monitor. That's 0.8g lighter than the AOC I2757F (4.4kgg), 0.3g lighter than the Asus MX279H (4.4kgg) and 0.5g heavier than the Samsung S27D590 (4.4kgg).
Not currently available
This PC monitor does not seem to be currently available. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
Marginally Lower user review Score
The DELL S2715H has an average user rating of 88%, but the AOC I2757F has an average user rating of 92% (based on 524 reviews), the Asus MX279H has an average user rating of 89% (based on 285 reviews) and the Samsung S27D590 has an average user rating of 91% (based on 79 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
8W lower RMS rated audio power Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has an RMS rated audio power of 10WW, whereas the Asus MX279H is a 6WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor (4W lower) and the DELL S2715H is an 18WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor (8W higher). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

$359 more expensive
The Samsung S27D590 is more expensive than the AOC I2757F by $359.01 and more expensive than the Asus MX279H by $269.01.
Less retailers
Only 1 shop sell the Samsung S27D590, whereas 9 retailers sell the Asus MX279H. Read more
Smaller numbers of retailers reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor and also reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock.
Eight months older
The Samsung S27D590 is older than the DELL S2715H by eight months.
Fewer awards
Whilst the Samsung S27D590 has received 4 awards, the AOC I2757F has received 15 awards and the Asus MX279H has received 10 awards.
A bit Lower expert review Score
The Samsung S27D590's average expert rating is 81%, however the AOC I2757F's is 83% (based on 38 reviews).
A bit Lower user review Score
The Samsung S27D590's average user rating is 91%, however the AOC I2757F's is 92% (based on 524 reviews).

Awards

15 Awards
altomdata.dk: Recommended
elchapuzasinformatico.com: Silver
elektroniktest.dk: Silver
gamezoom.net: Gold Award
hispazone.com: Recommended Product
in4.pl: Recommended
ixbt.com: Original Design
kitguru.net: Worth Buying
macworld.co.uk: Editor's Choice
PC Mag: Editor's Choice
technopat.net: Patented Design
thg.ru: Smart Buy
tomshardware.co.uk: Smart Buy
tomshardware.com: Smart Buy
Tweak.dk: Great Product
10 Awards
01net.com: 5 Star
altomdata.dk: Recommended
ferra.ru: Recommended
gamezoom.net: Gold Award
hardware.info: Silver Award
hardwaremx.com: Editor's Choice
techno-labs.com: Editor's Choice
technopat.net: Editor's Choice
uk.hardware.info: Silver
xfastest.com: Innovation Award
No awards found 4 Awards
3dnews.ru: Innovative Design
gagadget.com: Recommended
ixbt.com: Original Design
vido.com.ua: Recommended

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

50 months Ago 50 months Ago 27 months Ago 34 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data No data No data

Display

Screen Size
27" 27" 27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
BEST
 80000000:1
 80000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080i
 1080p
 720i
 720p
 576i
 576p
 480i
 480p
 1080i
 1080p
 720i
 720p
 576i
 576p
 480i
 480p
BEST
 1080i
 1080p
 720i
 720p
 576i
 576p
 480i
 480p
BEST
 1080i
 1080p
 720i
 720p
 576i
 576p
 480i
 480p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 80 Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 81
Viewable Height
336.15mm Unknown - Click to provide data 336.31mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
597.6mm Unknown - Click to provide data 597.89mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.311 x 0.311 0.3114 x 0.3114 0.3114 x 0.3114
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M 16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.56cm 68.6cm
BEST
68.6cm
BEST
68.6cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m² 250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
5ms
BEST
5ms
BEST
6ms 5ms
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 2.0 Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 2
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
2
BEST
2
BEST
1 2
BEST
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data 2
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

Audio System
Unknown - Click to provide data Bang & Olufsen ICEpower Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 6W
BEST
18W 10W
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 2 2

Design

Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Performance

Windows Operating System
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium
 Windows 8
 Windows 7 Home Premium

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 20 - -5 Unknown - Click to provide data -1 - 15
Automatic Shut Off
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
OSD Language
16 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Input Current
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1.7A Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
 A+
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
40W 37W 20W
BEST
23W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W 0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 44kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 55W 30W
BEST
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90 5 - 95
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 -20 - 45
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8kg 8kg 8.8kg 6.8kg
BEST
Packaging Height
490mm 537mm Unknown - Click to provide data 132mm
BEST
Packaging Depth
140mm 114mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 439mm
Packaging Width
714mm 700mm Unknown - Click to provide data 689mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 6.7kg 5kg
BEST
Height With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 445mm
BEST
465mm
Depth With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 196mm 169.2mm
BEST
Width With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 611.2mm
BEST
619.5mm
Weight
5.7kg 5.2kg 4.9kg 4.4kg
BEST
Height
499mm 441.3mm 361.5mm 388.6mm
Depth
130mm 225.2mm 46.1mm 58.5mm
Width
622mm 622.6mm 611.2mm 619.5mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
Interface Adapters Included
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
 DVI-I female - HDMI male
 DVI-I female - HDMI male

Other Features

Video Dot Rate
170MHz Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Volume Control
 Digital
 Digital
 Digital
 Digital
Feedback