AOC I2757F vs DELL S2715H vs Samsung S27D590

(562)
(20)
(99)
AOC I2757F
Samsung S27D590

Top Prices

Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
Amazon US
Out of stock
No prices found
Amazon US
Delivery unknown

Reasons For

7 Reasons For
Faster response time Edit
The AOC I2757F has a response time of 5msms (as does the Samsung S27D590), but the DELL S2715H is a 6msms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more HDMI port Edit
The AOC I2757F has two HDMI ports (as does the Samsung S27D590), however the DELL S2715H only has one HDMI port.
Cheaper by $359
The AOC I2757F costs $359.01 less than the Samsung S27D590.
1 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Eleven more awards
The AOC I2757F has 15 awards from expert review sites, whereas the Samsung S27D590 has 4 awards.
Marginally better expert reviews
Based on 38 reviews, the average expert review score of the AOC I2757F is 83%, however the average rating of the Samsung S27D590 is 81% (based on 20 reviews).
Marginally better user reviews
Based on 524 reviews, the average user review score of the AOC I2757F is 92%, however the average rating of the DELL S2715H is 88% (based on 19 reviews) and the average rating of the Samsung S27D590 is 91% (based on 79 reviews).
6 Reasons For
Slightly bigger viewable height Edit
The DELL S2715H has a viewable height of 336.31mmmm, however the AOC I2757F is only a 336.15mmmm viewable height PC monitor (0.16000000000003mm smaller).
Bigger viewable width Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 597.89mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 0.28999999999996mm bigger than the AOC I2757F ().
1% bigger display diagonal Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 68.6cmcm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the Samsung S27D590. That's 0.039999999999992cm bigger than the AOC I2757F (68.6cmcm).
Two USB 2.0 ports Edit
The DELL S2715H has two USB 2.0 ports, however the AOC I2757F only has one USB 2.0 port. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 2.0 ports on the Samsung S27D590. It is possible that it does not have any USB 2.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Having a number of USB 2.0 ports on your monitor is particularly useful for laptops where you frequently disconnect the laptop from the monitor. Just one USB connection from your laptop to your monitor will immediately connect all your other USB devices that are attached to the monitor.

One more USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The DELL S2715H is a two USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the AOC I2757F only has one USB Type-A downstream port. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Samsung S27D590. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

45% higher RMS rated audio power Edit
The DELL S2715H is an 18WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor. That's 8W higher than the Samsung S27D590 (10WW). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

6 Reasons For
Bigger display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S27D590 is a 68.6cmcm display diagonal PC monitor, and so does the DELL S2715H. That's 0.039999999999992cm bigger than the AOC I2757F (68.6cmcm).
50 cd/m² brighter display brightness Edit
The Samsung S27D590 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the AOC I2757F and the DELL S2715H (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
20% faster response time Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has a response time of 5msms (as does the AOC I2757F), however the DELL S2715H is a 6msms response time PC monitor (1ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One more HDMI port Edit
The Samsung S27D590 is a two HDMI port PC monitor (as does the AOC I2757F), whereas the DELL S2715H only has one HDMI port.
Lower maximum power consumption Edit
The Samsung S27D590 is a 30WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 25W lower than the DELL S2715H (30WW).
A lot lighter Edit
The Samsung S27D590 has a weight of 4.4kgg, whereas the AOC I2757F is a 5.7kgg weight PC monitor (1.3g heavier) and the DELL S2715H is a 4.9kgg weight PC monitor (0.5g heavier).

Reasons Against

8 Reasons Against
A little smaller viewable height Edit
The AOC I2757F has a viewable height of 336.15mmmm, however the DELL S2715H is a 336.31mmmm viewable height PC monitor (0.16000000000003mm bigger).
Smaller viewable width Edit
The AOC I2757F is a 597.6mmmm viewable width PC monitor. That's 0.28999999999996mm smaller than the DELL S2715H ().
1% smaller display diagonal Edit
The AOC I2757F is a 68.56cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.039999999999992cm smaller than the DELL S2715H and the Samsung S27D590 (68.6cmcm).
20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The AOC I2757F is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the DELL S2715H. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Samsung S27D590 (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
Only one USB 2.0 port Edit
The AOC I2757F has one USB 2.0 port, however the DELL S2715H only has two USB 2.0 ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB 2.0 ports on the Samsung S27D590. It is possible that it does not have any USB 2.0 ports.

USB 2.0 ports are used to connect peripherals such as a kayboard, mouse, or external drive to your computer via your monitor. The USB 2.0 port can also be used for USB flash drives.

Having a number of USB 2.0 ports on your monitor is particularly useful for laptops where you frequently disconnect the laptop from the monitor. Just one USB connection from your laptop to your monitor will immediately connect all your other USB devices that are attached to the monitor.

One less USB Type-A downstream port Edit
The AOC I2757F is a one USB Type-A downstream port PC monitor, whereas the DELL S2715H only has two USB Type-A downstream ports. Read more

We do not know the number of USB Type-A downstream ports on the Samsung S27D590. It is possible that it does not have any USB Type-A downstream ports.

23% heavier Edit
The AOC I2757F has a weight of 5.7kgg, however the DELL S2715H is a 4.9kgg weight PC monitor (0.8g lighter) and the Samsung S27D590 is a 4.4kgg weight PC monitor (1.3g lighter).
Older by over two years
The AOC I2757F is two years older than the DELL S2715H and 16 months older than the Samsung S27D590.
7 Reasons Against
20% dimmer display brightness Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the AOC I2757F. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the Samsung S27D590 (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
Slower response time Edit
The DELL S2715H has a response time of 6msms, but the AOC I2757F and the Samsung S27D590 are both 5msms response time PC monitors (1ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

One less HDMI port Edit
The DELL S2715H has one HDMI port, however the Samsung S27D590 only has two HDMI ports.
46% higher maximum power consumption Edit
The DELL S2715H is a 55WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 25W higher than the Samsung S27D590 (30WW).
11% heavier Edit
The DELL S2715H has a weight of 4.9kgg, however the AOC I2757F is a 5.7kgg weight PC monitor (0.8g heavier) and the Samsung S27D590 is a 4.4kgg weight PC monitor (0.5g lighter).
Not currently available
We couldn't find any retailers that are currently selling the product. Read more
You can sign up to a price alert to be notified when this product becomes available.
User review Rating is moderately Worse
The DELL S2715H's average user score is 88%, however the AOC I2757F's is 92% (based on 524 reviews) and the Samsung S27D590's is 91% (based on 79 reviews).
7 Reasons Against
Lower RMS rated audio power Edit
The Samsung S27D590 is a 10WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor. That's 8W lower than the DELL S2715H (10WW). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

More expensive by $359
The Samsung S27D590 is $359.01 more expensive than the AOC I2757F.
Fewer sellers
The Samsung S27D590 is only stocked by 1 shop, but the AOC I2757F is stocked by 2 stores. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Older by eight months
The Samsung S27D590 is eight months older than the DELL S2715H.
Eleven less awards
The Samsung S27D590 has only received 4 awards, but the AOC I2757F has received 15 awards.
Expert review Rating is a little Worse
The average expert rating of the Samsung S27D590 is 81%, whereas the average expert rating of the AOC I2757F is 83% (based on 38 reviews).
User review Rating is a little Worse
The average user rating of the Samsung S27D590 is 91%, whereas the average user rating of the AOC I2757F is 92% (based on 524 reviews).

Awards

15 Awards
altomdata.dk: Recommended
elchapuzasinformatico.com: Silver
elektroniktest.dk: Silver
gamezoom.net: Gold Award
hispazone.com: Recommended Product
in4.pl: Recommended
ixbt.com: Original Design
kitguru.net: Worth Buying
macworld.co.uk: Editor's Choice
PC Mag: Editor's Choice
technopat.net: Patented Design
thg.ru: Smart Buy
tomshardware.co.uk: Smart Buy
tomshardware.com: Smart Buy
Tweak.dk: Great Product
No awards found 4 Awards
3dnews.ru: Innovative Design
gagadget.com: Recommended
ixbt.com: Original Design
vido.com.ua: Recommended

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

50 months Ago 27 months Ago 34 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data No data

Display

Screen Size
27" 27" 27"
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 20000000:1
BEST
 20000000:1
 20000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Display Surface
 Gloss
 Gloss
 Gloss
Video Mode
 1080p
 720p
 480p
 1080p
 720p
 480p
BEST
 1080p
 720p
 480p
BEST
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
 Full HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 81
Viewable Height
336.15mm 336.31mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Width
597.6mm 597.89mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Vertical Scan Range
50 - 76 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
30 - 83 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Pixel Pitch
0.311 x 0.311 0.3114 x 0.3114 0.3114 x 0.3114
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
68.56cm 68.6cm
BEST
68.6cm
BEST
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
5ms
BEST
6ms 5ms
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 1
DisplayPort
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
USB 2.0 Port
1 2
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
2
BEST
1 2
BEST
VGA (D-Sub) Port
1 1 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
1 2
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
Unknown - Click to provide data 18W
BEST
10W
Loudspeaker
Unknown - Click to provide data 2 2

Design

Case Colour
 Silver
 Silver
 Silver

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
-5 - 15 Unknown - Click to provide data -1 - 15
Automatic Shut Off
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 1
OSD Language
16 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Input Current
Unknown - Click to provide data 1.7A Unknown - Click to provide data
Energy Efficiency Class
 A+
 A+
 A+
Typical Power Consumption
40W 20W
BEST
23W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 44kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 55W 30W
BEST
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 5000 Unknown - Click to provide data
Non-Operating Altitude
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 12192 Unknown - Click to provide data
Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 90 5 - 95
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 60 -20 - 45
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 40 10 - 40

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
8kg 8.8kg 6.8kg
BEST
Packaging Height
490mm Unknown - Click to provide data 132mm
BEST
Packaging Depth
140mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 439mm
Packaging Width
714mm Unknown - Click to provide data 689mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 6.7kg 5kg
BEST
Height With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 445mm
BEST
465mm
Depth With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 196mm 169.2mm
BEST
Width With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 611.2mm
BEST
619.5mm
Weight
5.7kg 4.9kg 4.4kg
BEST
Height
499mm 361.5mm 388.6mm
Depth
130mm 46.1mm 58.5mm
Width
622mm 611.2mm 619.5mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
 VGA
 HDMI
 AC
 USB

Other Features

Video Dot Rate
170MHz Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Feedback