Benq BL2711 vs Eizo ColorEdge CX271

(11)
(7)
Benq BL2711
Eizo ColorEdge CX271

Top Prices

Newegg UK
Best Buy
FREE Standard delivery
In stock
B&H Photo
In stock
Overstock
Adorama
Out of stock
MacMall
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

4 Reasons For
2ms faster response time Edit
The Benq BL2711 has a response time of 4msms, however the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 is a 6msms response time PC monitor (2ms slower). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Cheaper by $1,060
The Benq BL2711 is $1,059.61 cheaper than the Eizo ColorEdge CX271.
8 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the price competition amongst retailers for the product and also increases the chances of this PC monitor remaining in stock.
Cheaper to run by $462.41
Over five years the Benq BL2711 only costs $51.49 to run however the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 costs $513.90 to run (898% more). Read more
4 Reasons For
15.77M more display colour count Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX271 has a display colour count of 16.77MM, however the Benq BL2711 is only a 1,070MM display colours PC monitor (15.77M less).
11.5mm higher maximum height adjustment Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX271 has a maximum height adjustment of 151.5mmmm, whereas the Benq BL2711 is only a 140mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (11.5mm lower).
Better expert reviews
Based on 3 expert reviews, the average review score of the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 is 87%, but the average rating of the Benq BL2711 is 80% (based on 2 reviews).
Hugely better user reviews
Based on 4 user reviews, the average review score of the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 is 100%, but the average rating of the Benq BL2711 is 73% (based on 9 reviews).

Reasons Against

4 Reasons Against
Less display colour count Edit
Benq BL2711 is only 1,070MM display colours, but the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 is a 16.77MM display colours PC monitor (15.77M more).
11.5mm lower maximum height adjustment Edit
The Benq BL2711 has a maximum height adjustment of 140mmmm, however the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 is a 151.5mmmm maximum height adjustment PC monitor (11.5mm higher).
Expert review Rating is Worse
The average expert rating of the Benq BL2711 is 80%, whereas the average expert rating of the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 is 87% (based on 3 reviews).
User review Rating is significantly Worse
The average user rating of the Benq BL2711 is only 73%, whereas the average user rating of the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 is 100% (based on 4 reviews).
5 Reasons Against
2ms slower response time Edit
The Eizo ColorEdge CX271 has a response time of 6msms, whereas the Benq BL2711 is a 4msms response time PC monitor (2ms faster). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

More expensive by $1,060
The Eizo ColorEdge CX271 is $1,059.61 more expensive than the Benq BL2711.
Not as many stockists
The Eizo ColorEdge CX271 is only stocked by 3 retailers, however the Benq BL2711 is stocked by 11 sellers. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by one year
The Eizo ColorEdge CX271 is one year older than the Benq BL2711.
$462.41 more expensive to run over five years
The running costs of the Eizo ColorEdge CX271 are $513.90 which is $462.41 more than the Benq BL2711 over five years. Show assumptions.

Awards

No awards found 1 Award
Ephotozine: Highly Recommended

Average Expert Rating

Average User Rating

Date Released

22 months Ago 34 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 51.49
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ 51.49
Purchase price $ 437.99
Total cost of ownership $ 489.48
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ 52.71
Electricity cost - standby $ 461.19
Total running cost $ 513.90
Purchase price $ 1,497.60
Total cost of ownership $ 2,011.50
Details

Energy Efficiency Class

No data No data

Environmental Impact

0.33T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.33 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
9
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
3.3T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 3.3 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
85
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.

Display

Screen Size
27" 27"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 20000000:1
BEST
 20000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 2560 x 1440
 2560 x 1440
BEST
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1440p
 1440p
BEST
HD Type
 4K Ultra HD
BEST
 4K Ultra HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 23.75 - 61
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 15 - 78
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 335.6mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 596.7mm
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.155 x 0.155 0.2331 x 0.2331
Display Colour Count
1,070M 16.77M
BEST
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 68.4cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
300 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
Response Time
4ms
BEST
6ms
Color Gamut
100% 99%
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours
 1.073 billion colours
 16.78 million colours

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPort
1 1
USB 2.0 Port
2 2
USB 3.0 Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
1 1
DVI-D Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
1 1
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
2 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
2 2
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 2.0

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
6W Unknown - Click to provide data
Loudspeaker
2 Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
0 - 90 0 - 90
Maximum Height Adjustment
140mm 151.5mm
BEST
Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 0 - 25
Swivel Angle Range
-45 - 45 0 - 344
On Screen Display Language
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
 CHI (TR)
 CHI (SIMPL)
 ENG
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 ESP
 SWE
BEST
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data 9

Power

Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.7W
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
42W
BEST
43W
Standby Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 99W
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 99W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 20 - 80
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 35

Certificates

Certification
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
11kg Unknown - Click to provide data
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 12.8kg
Height With Stand
550.62mm
BEST
576.5mm
Depth With Stand
239.65mm
BEST
281.5mm
Width With Stand
639mm
BEST
646mm
Weight
8kg 12.8kg
BEST
Height
384.95mm 576.5mm
Depth
69.75mm 281.5mm
Width
639mm 646mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 USB
 DVI
 DisplayPort
 USB
 DVI
 DisplayPort
BEST
Feedback