HP EliteDisplay S140 vs Samsung S22D300

(232)
HP EliteDisplay S140
Samsung S22D300

Top Prices

No prices found No prices found

Reasons For

No data 7 Reasons For
7.5" bigger screen size Edit
The Samsung S22D300 has a screen size of 21.5"", however the HP EliteDisplay S140 is only a 14" PC monitor (7.5" smaller). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Bigger viewable height Edit
The Samsung S22D300 is a 268.11mmmm viewable height PC monitor. That's 94.01mm bigger than the HP EliteDisplay S140 (268.11mmmm).
167.04mm bigger viewable width Edit
The Samsung S22D300 has a viewable width of 476.64mmmm, whereas the HP EliteDisplay S140 is only a 309.6mm viewable width PC monitor (167.04mm smaller).
99% more display colour count Edit
The Samsung S22D300 is a 16.77MM display colours PC monitor. That's 16.51M more than the HP EliteDisplay S140 (16.77MM).
24% wider vertical viewing angle Edit
The Samsung S22D300 is a 65°° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 15° wider than the HP EliteDisplay S140 (65°°).
A lot bigger display diagonal Edit
The Samsung S22D300 has a display diagonal of 54cmcm, however the HP EliteDisplay S140 is only a 35.56cm display diagonal PC monitor (18.44cm smaller).
60% faster response time Edit
The Samsung S22D300 is a 5msms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms faster than the HP EliteDisplay S140 (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

Reasons Against

7 Reasons Against
7.5" smaller screen size Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S140 has a screen size of 14", whereas the Samsung S22D300 is a 21.5"" PC monitor (7.5" bigger). Read more

The display diagonal is a measure of the size of the monitor. It is measured from one corner of the screen to the diagonally opposite corner of the screen.

A bigger display diagonal means that the screen will be larger and better for displaying lots of content or for seeing the detail in photos and videos.

Smaller viewable height Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S140 is a 174.1mm viewable height PC monitor. That's 94.01mm smaller than the Samsung S22D300 (268.11mmmm).
167.04mm smaller viewable width Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S140 has a viewable width of 309.6mm, but the Samsung S22D300 is a 476.64mmmm viewable width PC monitor (167.04mm bigger).
Sixty-four times less display colour count Edit
HP EliteDisplay S140 is only 0.26M display colours. That's 16.51M less than the Samsung S22D300 (16.77MM).
Narrower vertical viewing angle Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S140 is a 50° vertical viewing angle PC monitor. That's 15° narrower than the Samsung S22D300 (65°°).
Significantly smaller display diagonal Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S140 has a display diagonal of 35.56cm, whereas the Samsung S22D300 is a 54cmcm display diagonal PC monitor (18.44cm bigger).
38% slower response time Edit
The HP EliteDisplay S140 is an 8ms response time PC monitor. That's 3ms slower than the Samsung S22D300 (5msms). Read more

The response time on a PC monitor is a measure of how quickly the monitor reacts to image data sent by the computer's graphics card. Fast response times are particularly important for gamers, who should ideally look for a response time of 8 milliseconds or less.

A faster (shorter) response time is better because fast moving graphics will appear smoother and the gaming experience will feel more responsive.

1 Reason Against
Six months older
The Samsung S22D300 is older than the HP EliteDisplay S140 by six months.

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found

Average User Rating

No reviews found

Date Released

27 months Ago 34 months Ago

Running Costs Over 5 Years

Electricity cost - switched on $ 4.94
Electricity cost - standby $ 2.35
Total running cost $ 7.29
Purchase price $ 134.99
Total cost of ownership $ 142.28
Details
Electricity cost - switched on $ -
Electricity cost - standby $ -
Total running cost $ -

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

0.047T
Running this PC monitor over 5 years will generate 0.047 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
1
To offset that much CO2 you would need to plant and grow them for 10 years.
No data

Display

Screen Size
14" 21.5"
BEST
Display Resolution
 1920 x 1080
 1920 x 1080
BEST
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
Display Type
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
 1600 x 900
 1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
 1440 x 900
 1280 x 720 (HD 720)
 1024 x 768 (XGA)
 800 x 600 (SVGA)
 640 x 480 (VGA)
 720 x 400
 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
BEST
Display Surface
 Gloss
 Gloss
Video Mode
 1080p
 1080p
BEST
Product Type
 PC monitor
 PC monitor
HD Type
 Full HD
 Full HD
BEST
Viewable Height
174.1mm 268.11mm
BEST
Viewable Width
309.6mm 476.64mm
BEST
Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Pixel Pitch
0.193 x 0.193 0.24825 x 0.24825
Display Colour Count
0.26M 16.77M
BEST
Vertical Viewing Angle
50° 65°
BEST
Horizontal Viewing Angle
90° 90°
BEST
Typical Contrast Ratio
 600:1
 600:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
35.56cm 54cm
BEST
Display Technology
 TN
 TN
Display Brightness
200 cd/m²
BEST
200 cd/m²
Response Time
8ms 5ms
BEST
Native Aspect Ratio
 16:9
 16:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 262144 colours
 16.78 million colours
 262144 colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

USB 3.0 Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
HDMI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
VGA (D-Sub) Port
Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
Unknown - Click to provide data
USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Type-A Downstream Port
1 Unknown - Click to provide data
USB Hub Version
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
 USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1)
Built-In USB Hub
 Built-in USB hub
Unknown - Click to provide data

Multimedia

Built-In Speaker
 Built-in speaker
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Built-In Camera
 Built-in camera
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Integrated TV Tuner
 Integrated TV tuner
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Black
 Black

Thin Client

Thin Client Installed
 Thin client installed
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Tilt Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data -1 - 20
Wall Mountable
 Wall mountable
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data
Cable Lock Slot
 Cable lock slot
Unknown - Click to provide data
VESA Mounting
 VESA mounting
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Power Consumption When Off
Unknown - Click to provide data 0.3W
Typical Power Consumption
4W 22W
BEST
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 31kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
7W Unknown - Click to provide data
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 50
 60
 50/60
 50
 60
 50/60
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 24
 100
 100-240
 240

Operational Conditions

Relative Humidity Storage Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 95
Relative Humidity Operating Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 80
Storage Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -20 - 45
Operating Temperature Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 10 - 40

Certificates

Energy Star Certificate
 Energy Star certificate
Unknown - Click to provide data
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 4kg
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 377mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 115mm
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 573mm
Weight With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 2.9kg
Height With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 385.2mm
Depth With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 177mm
Width With Stand
Unknown - Click to provide data 511.6mm
Weight
1.3kg
BEST
2.7kg
Height
217.1mm 310.8mm
Depth
13.5mm 53.1mm
Width
345.8mm 511.6mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 VGA
 VGA
BEST
Feedback