LG 29UB55 vs LG 29UB67 vs LG 29UM57-P vs LG 29UM67-P

(28)
(6)
LG 29UB55
LG 29UB67

Top Prices

eBay
In stock, only 2 left!
B&H Photo
In stock
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock
eBay
elite-market
Delivery unknown
Newegg UK
eBay
Newegg US
Delivery unknown
In stock

Reasons For

3 Reasons For
One more HDMI port Edit
The LG 29UB55 is a two HDMI port PC monitor (as do the LG 29UB67 and the LG 29UM57-P), whereas the LG 29UM67-P only has one HDMI port.
A lot lighter Edit
The LG 29UB55 has a weight of 4.9kgg, whereas the LG 29UB67 is a 6.3kgg weight PC monitor (1.4g heavier) and the LG 29UM67-P is a 5.2kgg weight PC monitor (0.3g heavier).
Cheaper by $21
The LG 29UB55 is $101 cheaper than the LG 29UB67, $20.99 cheaper than the LG 29UM57-P and $40 cheaper than the LG 29UM67-P.
5 Reasons For
17% brighter display brightness Edit
The LG 29UB67 is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the LG 29UM67-P. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the LG 29UB55 and the LG 29UM57-P (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
One more HDMI port Edit
The LG 29UB67 has two HDMI ports (as do the LG 29UB55 and the LG 29UM57-P), however the LG 29UM67-P only has one HDMI port.
3% lower maximum power consumption Edit
The LG 29UB67 is a 46WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 1W lower than the LG 29UM67-P (47WW).
6 shops are selling it
A greater number of sellers increases the chances of the product remaining in stock and also increases the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Energy efficiency rating is better
The LG 29UB67 has an energy efficiency rating of "B", however the LG 29UM57-P has a rating of "B" and the LG 29UM67-P has a rating of "B".
4 Reasons For
One more HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the LG 29UM57-P is two (as do the LG 29UB55 and the LG 29UB67), but the LG 29UM67-P only has one HDMI port.
Lower annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 29UM57-P is a 50kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 4kWh lower than the LG 29UB67 (53kWhkWh) and 3kWh lower than the LG 29UM67-P (53kWhkWh).
Energy efficiency rating is higher
The LG 29UM57-P has an energy efficiency rating of "B", but the LG 29UB67 has a rating of "B" and the LG 29UM67-P has a rating of "B".
Considerably better user reviews
The average user review score of the LG 29UM57-P is 100% based on 1 review, but the average rating of the LG 29UB55 is 86% (based on 28 reviews), the average rating of the LG 29UB67 is 90% (based on 2 reviews) and the average rating of the LG 29UM67-P is 80% (based on 5 reviews).
3 Reasons For
Brighter display brightness Edit
The LG 29UM67-P is a 300 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the LG 29UB67. That's 50 cd/m² brighter than the LG 29UB55 and the LG 29UM57-P (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
29% higher RMS rated audio power Edit
The LG 29UM67-P is a 14WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor. That's 4W higher than the LG 29UB55 and the LG 29UB67 (14WW). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Energy efficiency rating is higher
The LG 29UM67-P has an energy efficiency rating of "B", but the LG 29UB67 has a rating of "B" and the LG 29UM57-P has a rating of "B".

Reasons Against

5 Reasons Against
50 cd/m² dimmer display brightness Edit
The LG 29UB55 is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the LG 29UM57-P. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the LG 29UB67 and the LG 29UM67-P (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
Lower RMS rated audio power Edit
The LG 29UB55 is a 10WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor, and so does the LG 29UB67. That's 4W lower than the LG 29UM67-P (14WW). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

Fewer sellers
The LG 29UB55 is only stocked by 6 retailers, but the LG 29UB67 is stocked by 8 retailers. Read more
The fewer the number of shops that stock the product, the lower the competition amongst shops to keep prices low.
Older by six months
The LG 29UB55 is six months older than the LG 29UB67, five months older than the LG 29UM57-P and five months older than the LG 29UM67-P.
User review Rating is considerably Worse
The average user rating of the LG 29UB55 is 86%, whereas the average user rating of the LG 29UB67 is 90% (based on 2 reviews) and the LG 29UM57-P is 100% (based on 1 review).
5 Reasons Against
40% lower RMS rated audio power Edit
The LG 29UB67 is a 10WW RMS rated audio power PC monitor, and so does the LG 29UB55. That's 4W lower than the LG 29UM67-P (14WW). Read more

RMS rated power is a true measure of the power of the audio system on a monitor. It also sometimes referred to as the Continuous Power. RMS stands for Root Mean Square and is measured in Watts (voltage x current). The RMS rated power is the highest amount of power that an amplifier can deliver continuously without failing.

A higher RMS rated power will provide audio that is louder and cleaner.

8% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 29UB67 is a 54kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 4kWh higher than the LG 29UM57-P (53kWhkWh) and 1kWh higher than the LG 29UM67-P (53kWhkWh).
23% heavier Edit
The LG 29UB67 has a weight of 6.3kgg, however the LG 29UB55 is a 4.9kgg weight PC monitor (1.4g lighter) and the LG 29UM67-P is a 5.2kgg weight PC monitor (1.1g lighter).
More expensive by $101
The LG 29UB67 is $101 more expensive than the LG 29UB55, $80.01 more expensive than the LG 29UM57-P and $61 more expensive than the LG 29UM67-P.
User review Rating is much Worse
The LG 29UB67's average user score is 90%, however the LG 29UM57-P's is 100% (based on 1 review).
5 Reasons Against
Dimmer display brightness Edit
The LG 29UM57-P is a 250 cd/m² cd/m² display brightness PC monitor, and so does the LG 29UB55. That's 50 cd/m² dimmer than the LG 29UB67 and the LG 29UM67-P (300 cd/m² cd/m²).
One less DVI port Edit
The LG 29UM57-P is a DVI port PC monitor, whereas the LG 29UM67-P only has one DVI port.
More expensive by $21
The LG 29UM57-P is $20.99 more expensive than the LG 29UB55.
Not as many stockists
The LG 29UM57-P is only stocked by 2 retailers, however the LG 29UB55 is stocked by 6 shops, the LG 29UB67 is stocked by 8 sellers and the LG 29UM67-P is stocked by 3 shops. Read more
Fewer numbers of shops reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by one month
The LG 29UM57-P is one month older than the LG 29UB67. The LG 29UM57-P is the same age as the LG 29UM67-P.
9 Reasons Against
1% smaller display diagonal Edit
The LG 29UM67-P is a 73.6cmcm display diagonal PC monitor. That's 0.060000000000002cm smaller than the LG 29UB67 (73.6cmcm) and 0.59999999999999cm bigger than the LG 29UM57-P (73.6cmcm).
One less HDMI port Edit
The number of HDMI ports on the LG 29UM67-P is one, but the LG 29UM57-P only has two HDMI ports.
6% higher annual energy consumption Edit
The LG 29UM67-P is a 53kWhkWh annual energy consumption PC monitor. That's 1kWh lower than the LG 29UB67 (53kWhkWh) and 3kWh higher than the LG 29UM57-P (53kWhkWh).
3% higher maximum power consumption Edit
The LG 29UM67-P is a 47WW maximum power consumption PC monitor. That's 1W higher than the LG 29UB67 (47WW).
0.3g heavier Edit
The LG 29UM67-P has a weight of 5.2kgg, but the LG 29UB55 is a 4.9kgg weight PC monitor (0.3g lighter) and the LG 29UB67 is a 6.3kgg weight PC monitor (1.1g heavier).
More expensive by $40
The LG 29UM67-P is $40 more expensive than the LG 29UB55 and $19.01 more expensive than the LG 29UM57-P.
Not as many stockists
The LG 29UM67-P is only stocked by 3 retailers, however the LG 29UB55 is stocked by 6 sellers and the LG 29UB67 is stocked by 8 stores. Read more
Fewer numbers of sellers reduces the chances of the product remaining in stock and also reduces the price competition amongst retailers for this PC monitor.
Older by one month
The LG 29UM67-P is one month older than the LG 29UB67. The LG 29UM67-P is the same age as the LG 29UM57-P.
User review Rating is hugely Worse
The LG 29UM67-P has an average user score of 80%, but the LG 29UB55 has an average user rating of 86% (based on 28 reviews), the LG 29UB67 has an average user rating of 90% (based on 2 reviews) and the LG 29UM57-P has an average user rating of 100% (based on 1 review).

Average Expert Rating

No reviews found No reviews found

Average User Rating

Date Released

28 months Ago 23 months Ago 23 months Ago 23 months Ago

Energy Efficiency Class

No data

Environmental Impact

No data No data No data No data

Display

Screen Size
29" 29" 29" 29"
Dynamic Contrast Ratio
 5000000:1
 5000000:1
 5000000:1
 5000000:1
Display Type
 LED
 LED
 LED
 LED
Graphics Resolution
 2560 x 1080
 2560 x 1080
 2560 x 1080
 2560 x 1080
Backlight Type
 W-LED
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
BEST
 W-LED
BEST
Display Surface
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
 Matt
Video Mode
 1080p
 720p
BEST
 1080p
 720p
 1080p
 720p
BEST
 1080p
 720p
BEST
HD Type
 Wide Quad HD
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
BEST
 Wide Quad HD
Digital Vertical Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 75 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Digital Horizontal Frequency
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Viewable Height
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 290.2mm
Viewable Width
Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data 677mm
Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
 21:9
 21:9
Vertical Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 56 - 61 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Horizontal Scan Range
Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data 30 - 90
Pixel Pitch
0.2628 x 0.2628 0.264 x 0.264 Unknown - Click to provide data 0.264 x 0.264
Display Colour Count
16.77M 16.77M Unknown - Click to provide data 16.77M
Vertical Viewing Angle
178° 178° Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
Horizontal Viewing Angle
178° 178° Unknown - Click to provide data 178°
Typical Contrast Ratio
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
 1000:1
 1000:1
BEST
Display Diagonal
Unknown - Click to provide data 73.66cm 73cm
BEST
73.6cm
Display Technology
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
 IPS
Display Brightness
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
250 cd/m² 300 cd/m²
BEST
Response Time
Unknown - Click to provide data 5ms 5ms 5ms
Color Gamut
100% Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Screen Shape
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
 Flat
Native Aspect Ratio
 21:9
 21:9
 21:9
 21:9
Supported Number of Colours Display
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
 16.78 million colours
Dynamic Contrast Ratio Marketing Name
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast
 Mega Contrast

Ports & Interfaces

Headphone Output
Unknown - Click to provide data 1 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
DisplayPort
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
HDMI Port
2
BEST
2
BEST
2
BEST
1
DVI-D Port
1 1 Unknown - Click to provide data 1
DVI Port
1
BEST
1
BEST
1
BEST

Multimedia

RMS Rated Audio Power
10W 10W Unknown - Click to provide data 14W
BEST
Loudspeaker
2 2 Unknown - Click to provide data 2

Design

Coloured Feet
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black
Case Colour
 Black
 Black
 Black
 Black

Performance

Mean Time Between Failures
Unknown - Click to provide data 50,000h Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Ergonomics

Pivot Angle
Unknown - Click to provide data 0 - 90 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Maximum Height Adjustment
130mm 130mm Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Tilt Angle
-5 - 20 -5 - 35 Unknown - Click to provide data 5 - 20
Swivel Angle Range
Unknown - Click to provide data -40 - 45 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
On Screen Display Language
 GRE
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 KOR
 GRE
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 KOR
 GRE
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 KOR
 GRE
 RUS
 ENG
 FIN
 FRE
 DEU
 ITA
 JPN
 POL
 POR
 ESP
 SWE
 KOR
OSD Language
Unknown - Click to provide data 15 Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data

Power

Energy Efficiency Class
 B
 B
BEST
 B
BEST
 B
BEST
Power Consumption When in PowerSave Mode
0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Power Consumption When Off
0.5W 0.5W Unknown - Click to provide data Unknown - Click to provide data
Typical Power Consumption
34W 31W
BEST
35W 36W
Standby Power Consumption
0.5W 0.5W 0.3W
BEST
0.3W
BEST
Annual Energy Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 54kWh 50kWh
BEST
53kWh
Maximum Power Consumption
Unknown - Click to provide data 46W
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 47W
Input Voltage
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
BEST
 100 - 240
 100 - 240
BEST
AC Input Frequency
 47/63
 47/63
 47/63
 47/63
AC Input Voltage
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-240
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-240
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-240
 9
 90
 24
 100
 100-240
 240
 90-240
 9
 90

Certificates

Certification
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
 RoHS
 TCO
 RoHS
 TCO
BEST
EPEAT Compliance
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold
 Gold

Weight & Dimensions

Package Weight
Unknown - Click to provide data 10kg
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 8.9kg
Packaging Height
Unknown - Click to provide data 405mm
BEST
Unknown - Click to provide data 814mm
Packaging Depth
Unknown - Click to provide data 156mm Unknown - Click to provide data 151mm
BEST
Packaging Width
Unknown - Click to provide data 814mm Unknown - Click to provide data 405mm
BEST
Weight With Stand
6.3kg 8.6kg Unknown - Click to provide data 6.2kg
BEST
Height With Stand
377mm
BEST
404mm Unknown - Click to provide data 418mm
Depth With Stand
259mm 252.3mm Unknown - Click to provide data 181mm
BEST
Width With Stand
703mm 703mm Unknown - Click to provide data 703mm
Weight
4.9kg
BEST
6.3kg Unknown - Click to provide data 5.2kg
Height
328mm 321.2mm Unknown - Click to provide data 328mm
Depth
43mm 62mm Unknown - Click to provide data 64mm
Width
703mm 703mm Unknown - Click to provide data 703mm

Packaging Content

Cable Included
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
BEST
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
BEST
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
 HDMI
 AC
 USB
 DisplayPort
BEST
Feedback